Azacytidine (Vidaza®) Versus Fludarabine and Cytarabine (Fluga Scheme) in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT ID: NCT02319135
Last Updated: 2020-04-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
289 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2019-10-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Vidaza Versus Conventional Care Regimens for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT01074047
Azacitidine in Combination With Low Dose Intensity Venetoclax in Patients With AML Incl. Explorative AML Profiling
NCT05431257
A Study Evaluating Intensive Chemotherapy With or Without Glasdegib or Azacitidine With or Without Glasdegib In Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT03416179
Azacytidine and Lymphocytes in Relapse of AML or MDS After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.
NCT02017457
Study of MLN4924 Plus Azacitidine in Treatment-naive Participants With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Who Are 60 Years or Older
NCT01814826
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will be conducted in 3 phases of different duration:
1. Selection phase (up to 14 days from the signature of informed consent): informed consent and review of the inclusion and exclusion criteria performing the relevant assessments.
2. Treatment Phase (from the start of treatment until the end of cycle 9): Induction phase (3 cycles) and consolidation phase (cycles 4-9). Study visits during treatment will be weekly during the induction phase (first 3 cycles) and every 2 weeks until the end of the consolidation phase.
3. Follow-up phase: monthly monitoring will be performed on all patients until they have completed a minimum of 2 years from the start of treatment, whether or not they continue receiving azacitidine cycles or Mini-Fluga according to the protocol. Following these 24 months, follow-up will be carried out at least quarterly. Patients suffering disease progression or relapse of the disease, or being early withdrawn due to any of the reasons specified in the protocol will be followed-up for survival until the end of the study or until the death of all patients, whichever comes first.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
fludarabine cytarabine
Priming with daily administration of subcutaneous G-CSF (lenograstim or filgrastim 5 mcg /kg / day, days -1, 1 and 2) (not given if hyperleukocytosis\> 25 x 109/l), followed by:
* Oral fludarabine (40 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) and subcutaneous cytarabine (75mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) (FLUGA scheme) (fludarabine and cytarabine only days 1 to 4 if age ≥75 years), OR
* Fludarabine (25 mg/m2/day) and cytarabine (75 mg/m2/day infusion of 6 hours) on their intravenous formulations if the patient is hospitalized (patients with hyperleukocytosis or other unfavourable conditions).
Treatment cycles every 28 days
Fludarabine
Cytarabine
Lenograstim
Filgastrim
Azacitidine
Subcutaneous Azacitidine 75 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 7. Treatment cycles every 28 days.
Azacitadine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Azacitadine
Fludarabine
Cytarabine
Lenograstim
Filgastrim
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
routine care of patients.
2. \- Age greater than or equal to 65.
3. \- Morphological diagnosis of non-promyelocytic AML according to the WHO criteria.
4. \- Newly diagnosed AML.
5. \- ECOG performance status \<4.
6. \- Ability and willingness to comply with the schedule of study visits.
Exclusion Criteria
2. \- Patients with AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myeloproloferative syndrome who have been previously treated with antileukemic agents
(hypomethylating or standard chemotherapy). Treatment with hydroxyurea prior to randomization is allowed.
3. \- Serum creatinine ≥ 250 mmol / l (≥ 2.5 mg/dL) (unless attributed to AML).
4. \- Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase or ALT \> 5 times the value of the upper limit of normal (unless attributed to AML) .
5. \- Presence of an active and/or non controlled pathology different to AML which is severe and life-threatening, that in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
6. \- Other active concomitant malignancy or whose remission is less than one year from the screening day (except carcinoma in situ).
7. \- Presence of any psychiatric illness or medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
8. \- Life expectancy less than X months.
9. \- Inability of the patient or his legal representative to understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dynamic Solutions
INDUSTRY
PETHEMA Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pau Montesinos, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PETHEMA Foundation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ayala R, Rapado I, Onecha E, Martinez-Cuadron D, Carreno-Tarragona G, Bergua JM, Vives S, Algarra JL, Tormo M, Martinez P, Serrano J, Herrera P, Ramos F, Salamero O, Lavilla E, Gil C, Lopez Lorenzo JL, Vidriales MB, Labrador J, Falantes JF, Sayas MJ, Paiva B, Barragan E, Prosper F, Sanz MA, Martinez-Lopez J, Montesinos P, On Behalf Of The Programa Para El Estudio de la Terapeutica En Hemopatias Malignas Pethema Cooperative Study Group. The Mutational Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Predicts Responses and Outcomes in Elderly Patients from the PETHEMA-FLUGAZA Phase 3 Clinical Trial. Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 18;13(10):2458. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102458.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FLUGAZA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.