Geriatric Assessment & Genetic Profiling to Personalize Therapy in Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT03226418

Last Updated: 2025-11-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-07

Study Completion Date

2024-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is among the most common hematologic malignancies in adults and accounts for approximately 10,000 deaths in the United States every year. AML is commonly diagnosed in sixth or seventh decades of life. The management of AML is complex in older patients because of associated comorbidities, intolerance to high-dose chemotherapy and high-risk tumor biology. In real world practice, over one-third of patients aged 60 years and older do not receive initial chemotherapy for AML, consequently, only 10-20% of patients are alive at 3-5 years. Longer-term survival has not improved significantly in last few decades. Poor survival of older patients with AML may be improved with refined risk-stratification and therapy selection strategies, integration of principles of geriatric medicine, and use of effective but low intensity and novel therapies.

This study will examine the impact of clinicogenetic risk-stratified management on outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia in older participants (≥ 60 years) with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who receive clinicogenetic risk-stratified therapy allocation. Participants will receive standard of care intensive or low-intensity induction based on cytogenetic and geriatric assessment-based risk stratification. Participants will be evaluated for disease status, survival, quality of life and neurocognitive status for 90 days and then followed for a total of 2 years for survival data.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is among the most common hematologic malignancies in adults and accounts for approximately 10,000 deaths in the United States every year. AML is commonly diagnosed in sixth or seventh decades of life. The management of AML is complex in older patients because of associated comorbidities, intolerance to high-dose chemotherapy and high-risk tumor biology. The current approach for therapy selection is largely subjective based on chronological age, performance status and/or comorbidities, and does not clearly identify patients who should undergo or forego intensive chemotherapy. The outcomes of older patients with high-risk AML can improve with enhanced risk-stratification and therapy selection strategies, and with the use of low intensity combination chemotherapy in patients who are not fit to receive intensive chemotherapy.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment offers a thorough assessment of multiple health domains including comorbidities, polypharmacy, cognitive, nutritional, psychological, functional and social status. Such multidimensional assessment based on geriatric principles is an important tool that can improve risk-stratification and therapy selection in older patients. This approach provides a deeper understanding of the biological age and physical fitness of patients, and anticipated tolerance to chemotherapy. In older patients with AML, previous studies have demonstrated that comprehensive geriatric assessment uncovers significant functional impairments and predicts toxicities and overall survival. Hence, geriatric assessment is considered superior to therapy allocation based on assessment of age and performance status.

Up to 75 participants newly diagnosed with AML or AML equivalents, such as myeloid sarcoma, myelodysplastic syndrome in transition to AML or high-grade treatment-related myeloid neoplasm will be enrolled and assigned to one of two groups based on cytogenetic and geriatric assessment-based risk stratification. Group I will receive intensive induction and consolidation therapy. Participants will receive cytarabine and idarubicin or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine to which gemtuzumab or midostaurin will be added for one course of treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants who go into remission will then receive either cytarabine or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine, depending on induction therapy, for up to 4 or 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Group II will receive low-intensity induction and consolidation therapy. Participants will receive oral venetoclax and azacitidine, decitabine or alternate standard of care low-intensity therapies up to four courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants who achieve complete remission will then receive the above treatments for three or more courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant. All participants are followed up for up to 2 years after completion of treatment.

Study objectives include determining the rate of complete remission and mortality at 90 days in participants who receive clinicogenetic risk-stratified therapy allocation, determining the rate of complete remission and mortality in participants who receive intensive versus low-intensity chemotherapy, determining proportion of participants with impairments detected by geriatric assessment, determining the percentage of older participants receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant during the study, and to assessing the overall survival at 1-year for the entire cohort of participants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I Intensive Induction and Consolidation Therapies

Intensive Induction Therapy: Participants receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) on days 1-7 and idarubicin over 10-15 minutes on days 1-3 (7+3), or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3 and 5. Gemtuzumab or midostaurin is added to 7+3 as per the standard of care. Treatment continues for 1 course in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Intensive Consolidation Therapy: Participants who go into remission, receive cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours twice daily (BID) on days 1, 3, and 5. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 2-4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants treated with liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Treatment repeats every 5-8 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Idarubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Group II Low-intensity Induction and Consolidation Therapies

Low-intensity: Participants receive venetoclax in combination with azacitidine or decitabine or other standard of care low-intensity therapy such as azacitidine or decitabine alone or in combination with fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor such as midostaurin, low-dose cytarabine in combination with glasdegib. Venetoclax dose varies depending on drug interaction with anti-fungal agents. Given daily continuous for 3 or more months orally. Glasdegib dose is 100 mg oral daily.

Decitabine intravenously (IV) over 1 - 3 hours daily for 5 - 10 days. Treatment repeats every 4 - 5 weeks for 3 or more courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant. Azacitidine IV infusion over 10 to 40 minutes days 1 - 7. Treatment repeats every 4 - 5 weeks for 3 or more courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Azacitidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by infusion

Venetoclax

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablet

glasdegib

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablet

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cytarabine

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Decitabine

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Idarubicin

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Azacitidine

Given by infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Venetoclax

oral tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

glasdegib

oral tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

.beta.-Cytosine arabinoside 1-.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosyl-4-amino-2(1H)pyrimidinone 1-.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine 1-Beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-4-amino-2(1H)pyrimidinone 1-Beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine 1.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine 2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-Amino-1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl- 2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-amino-1.beta.-D-arabinofuranosyl- Alexan Ara-C ARA-cell Arabinofuranosylcytosine Arabinosylcytosine Aracytidine Aracytin Aracytine Beta-cytosine Arabinoside CHX-3311 Cytosine Arabinoside Cytosine-.beta.-arabinoside Arabine Cytarabinum Cytarbel Cytosar Cytosine-beta-arabinoside Erpalfa Starasid Tarabine PFS U 19920 U-19920 Udicil WR-28453 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine Aza-TdC Dacogen Decitabine for Injection Deoxyazacytidine Dezocitidine 4-Demethoxydaunomycin 4-demethoxydaunorubicin 4-DMDR CPX-351 Cytarabine-Daunorubicin Liposome for Injection Liposomal AraC-Daunorubicin CPX-351 Liposomal Cytarabine-Daunorubicin Liposome-encapsulated Combination of Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Vyxeos Quality of Life Assessment VIDAZA Venclexta, Venclyxto Daurismo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* New diagnosis of de novo, secondary or treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML), other AML equivalent such as myeloid sarcoma, myelodysplastic syndrome in transformation to AML, or high-grade treatment-related myeloid neoplasm
* 60 years of age or older
* Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60%
* Able and willingly give signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Participants with brief exposure to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), arsenic trioxide (ATO) or similar product for suspected APL, who later turn out not to have APL, are eligible.
* Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) requiring salvage therapy
* Prior exposure to decitabine or azacitidine (exclusion criterion for use of decitabine or azacitidine)
* Participants requiring urgent initiation of chemotherapy for leukemia-related emergencies such as leukostasis or disseminated intravascular coagulopathy Participants will not be excluded solely based on current or prior use of debulking agent (e.g., hydroxyurea or cyclophosphamide). Prior or current use of leukapheresis will be allowed.
* Uncontrolled serious infection at enrollment. Infections are considered controlled if appropriate therapy has been instituted and, at enrollment, participants do not have signs of infection progression (e.g., hemodynamic instability attributable to sepsis, new symptoms, worsening physical signs or radiographic findings attributable to infection). Persistent fever without other signs or symptoms will not be interpreted as progressing infection.
* Uncontrolled clinically significant arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia or congestive heart failure within the past 2 weeks, that is considered a contraindication for initiation of chemotherapy by the treating physician
* Ejection fraction \< 45% will be an exclusion criterion for intensive chemotherapy. These participants may receive low intensity therapy.
* Clinically significant kidney (e.g., glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤ 45ml/minute or creatinine of ≥2 mg/dl) or liver dysfunction \[e.g., aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or bilirubin ≥2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)\] at enrollment that may prevent safe use of chemotherapy. These participants may be allowed to receive low-intensity chemotherapy. Participants with elevated bilirubin secondary to Gilbert syndrome will not be excluded.
* Any other condition that may not allow safe use of chemotherapy based on clinical judgment of treating oncologist
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Nebraska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vijaya R Bhatt, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Nebraska

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bhatt VR, Wichman C, Koll TT, Fisher AL, Wildes TM, Berger A, Armitage JO, Holstein SA, Maness LJ, Gundabolu K. Longitudinal changes in cognitive and physical function and health-related quality of life in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia. J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jan;15(1):101676. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101676. Epub 2023 Nov 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38000343 (View on PubMed)

Bhatt VR, Wichman C, Al-Kadhimi ZS, Koll TT, Fisher AL, Mahato RI, Hyde RK, Berger A, Armitage JO, Holstein SA, Maness LJ, Gundabolu K. Integrating geriatric assessment and genetic profiling to personalize therapy selection in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jul;13(6):871-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35450817 (View on PubMed)

Bhatt VR, Wichman CS, Koll TT, Fisher AL, Wildes TM, Haddadin M, Berger AM, Armitage JO, Holstein SA, Maness LJ, Gundabolu K. A Phase II Trial of Geriatric Assessment-Guided Selection of Treatment Intensity in Older Adults With AML. Am J Hematol. 2025 Jul;100(7):1163-1172. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27694. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40298352 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2017-01285

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P30CA036727

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

0179-17-FB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.