Lintuzumab-Ac225 in Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients
NCT ID: NCT02575963
Last Updated: 2023-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-10-31
2020-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Establish the MTD of fractionated doses of Lintuzumab-Ac225 in combination with low dose cytosine arabinoside (Low Dose Ara-C, LDAC) (Phase 1 portion)
2. Determine the response rate (CR + CRp + CRi) to fractionated doses of Lintuzumab-Ac225 alone (Phase 2 portion)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Venetoclax, Azacitidine, and Lintuzumab-Ac225 in AML Patients
NCT03932318
5-Azacytidine With Lenalidomide in Patients With High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
NCT01038635
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Azacitidine Subcutaneous in Combination With Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Previously Untreated Adults With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT02775903
Safety and Efficacy Study of Pracinostat With Azacitadine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT01912274
A Trial to Evaluate Two Schedules of MS275 in Combination With 5AC in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT01305499
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase II, efficacy component. The study was designed as a 2- stage minimax design. Patients will be given two infusions of Lintuzumab-Ac225, 4-8 days apart (Day 5-Day 9), initially at the dose level determined to be the MTD in the Phase I portion. The second dose of Lintuzumab-Ac225 may be delayed up to 14 days after the first dose for clinical or scheduling reasons. Response will be initially assessed on or around days 28-42 after the final study drug administration. The primary endpoint (CR+CRp + CRi) will be determined on day 42. Best response will be evaluated from Day 1, Dose 1 until the end of the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Phase 1 (Completed)
Cytarabine + Lintuzumab-Ac225 Cytarabine days 1 to 10 of each cycle. Doses were divided into 2 equal fractions with the first fraction given approx. 4-7 days after 1 cycle of low dose cytarabine and the second fraction given 4-7 days after the first fraction, followed by up to 11 more cycles. Furosemide (Phase 1 only) and Spironolactone were administered after Lintuzumab-Ac225.
Experimental: Phase 2
Experimental: Lintuzumab-Ac225 The Phase II dose determined during the Phase I dose escalation was 4.0 μCi/Kg Lintuzumab-Ac225 and 25 μg/Kg unlabeled HuM195 divided into 2 equal fractions with the first fraction given on Day 1 and the second fraction given on Day 5-8. Spironolactone is administered after Lintuzumab-Ac225.
Cytarabine (Phase 1 only)
Low dose cytarabine administered at 20 mg subcutaneously every 12 hours for the first 10 days (Days 1 to 10) of every cycle. Cycle 1 can last up to 52 days (depending on the schedule of study drug dosing) in order to allow for recovery from Lintuzumab-Ac225. Cycles 2-12 will last 28 days each.
Lintuzumab-Ac225
In Phase 1 the starting dose level was 1.0 μCi/Kg of Lintuzumab-Ac225 and 15 μg/Kg unlabeled HuM195 divided into 2 equal fractionated doses (0.5 μCi/Kg and 7.5 μg /Kg + 0.5 μCi/Kg and 7.5 μg /Kg) with the first fraction administered approximately 4-7 days after 1 cycle of low dose cytarabine and the second fraction administered 4-7 days after the first fraction, followed by up to 11 more cycles. In Phase 2 the dose will be 4.0 μCi/Kg Lintuzumab-Ac225 and 25 μg/Kg unlabeled HuM195 divided into 2 equal fractions with the first fraction given on Day 1 and the second fraction given on Day 5-8.
Furosemide (Phase 1 only)
40 mg by mouth daily one day prior to treatment with Lintuzumab-Ac225 and continuing for 10 days following administration of the 2nd divided dose.
Spironolactone
25 mg by mouth daily, administered 10 days after second dose of 225Ac-HuM195 and continued for 12 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cytarabine (Phase 1 only)
Low dose cytarabine administered at 20 mg subcutaneously every 12 hours for the first 10 days (Days 1 to 10) of every cycle. Cycle 1 can last up to 52 days (depending on the schedule of study drug dosing) in order to allow for recovery from Lintuzumab-Ac225. Cycles 2-12 will last 28 days each.
Lintuzumab-Ac225
In Phase 1 the starting dose level was 1.0 μCi/Kg of Lintuzumab-Ac225 and 15 μg/Kg unlabeled HuM195 divided into 2 equal fractionated doses (0.5 μCi/Kg and 7.5 μg /Kg + 0.5 μCi/Kg and 7.5 μg /Kg) with the first fraction administered approximately 4-7 days after 1 cycle of low dose cytarabine and the second fraction administered 4-7 days after the first fraction, followed by up to 11 more cycles. In Phase 2 the dose will be 4.0 μCi/Kg Lintuzumab-Ac225 and 25 μg/Kg unlabeled HuM195 divided into 2 equal fractions with the first fraction given on Day 1 and the second fraction given on Day 5-8.
Furosemide (Phase 1 only)
40 mg by mouth daily one day prior to treatment with Lintuzumab-Ac225 and continuing for 10 days following administration of the 2nd divided dose.
Spironolactone
25 mg by mouth daily, administered 10 days after second dose of 225Ac-HuM195 and continued for 12 months.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients age ≥60 years who:
1. Are unwilling to receive intensive (e.g. 7+3) chemotherapy, or
2. Have poor-risk prognostic factors defined as antecedent hematologic disorder, prior chemotherapy or XRT, abnormal karyotype other than t(8;21), inv16, or t(16;16), any karyotype with FLT3-ITD, or presenting WBC\>100K, or
3. Have significant comorbidities, that in the judgment of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for standard dose induction chemotherapy (e.g. anthracycline and infusional cytarabine given as 7+3), or;
4. Any patient age ≥ 70 years.
3. Blast count ≥20%
4. Greater than 25% of blasts must be CD33 positive.
5. Adequate renal and hepatic function
6. ECOG ≤ 3
1. Untreated AML, including patients with an antecedent hematologic disorder or secondary disease. Patients with prior MDS may have received therapy with immunomodulatory agents for this diagnosis.
2. Patients age ≥60 years who:
1. Patients ≥60 years unfit to receive intensive (e.g., 7+3) chemotherapy who have:
* Congestive heart failure or documented cardiomyopathy with an EF ≤50%, provided that EF ≥35% or,
* Documented pulmonary disease with DLCO ≤65% or FEV1 ≤65%, provided that patients do not require more than 2 L of oxygen per minute or,
* Documented liver disease with marked elevation of transaminases \>3 x ULN or,
* Serum creatinine \>1.2 mg/dL
2. Have significant comorbidities, that in the judgment of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for standard dose induction chemotherapy (e.g., anthracycline and infusional cytarabine given as 7+3); or
3. Any patient age ≥ 75 years.
3. Blast count ≥ 20% (WHO criteria)
4. Greater than 25% of blasts must be CD33 positive.
5. Have a circulating blast count of less than 200/mm3 (control with hydroxyurea or similar agent is allowed);
6. Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dl
7. Estimated creatinine clearance ≥ 50ml/min
8. Bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dl; AST and ALT \< 5.0 times the ULN
9. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 2
Exclusion Criteria
2. Treatment with chemotherapy or biologic therapy within 3 weeks, except for hydroxyurea, which must be discontinued prior to treatment on study
3. Treatment with radiation within 6 weeks
4. Active serious infections uncontrolled by antibiotics
5. Active malignancy within 2 years of entry, except previously treated non-melanoma skin cancer, carcinoma in situ or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and organ confined prostate cancer with no evidence of progressive disease based on PSA levels and are not on active therapy.
6. Clinically significant cardiac or pulmonary disease
7. Patients with liver cirrhosis
8. Active CNS leukemia. Patients with symptoms of CNS involvement, particularly those with M4 or M5 subtypes, should undergo lumbar puncture prior to treatment on study to exclude CNS disease. Symptoms include cranial neuropathies, other neurologic deficits, and headache.
9. Psychiatric disorder that would preclude study participation
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Actinium Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Avinash Desai, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Actinium Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCLA Medical Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
University of Louisville, James Graham Brown Cancer Center
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Ochsner Medical Center, The Gayle and Tom Benson Cancer Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York, New York, United States
Columbia University Medical, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Duke Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
St. Francis Cancer Center
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Swedish Cancer Institute, Center for Blood Disorders and Stem Cell Transplantation
Seattle, Washington, United States
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
West Virginia University, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
VA Caribbean Healthcare System
San Juan, , Puerto Rico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Larson SM, Carrasquillo JA, Cheung NK, Press OW. Radioimmunotherapy of human tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jun;15(6):347-60. doi: 10.1038/nrc3925.
Jurcic JG, Rosenblat TL. Targeted alpha-particle immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e126-31. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e126.
Scheinberg DA, McDevitt MR. Actinium-225 in targeted alpha-particle therapeutic applications. Curr Radiopharm. 2011 Oct;4(4):306-20. doi: 10.2174/1874471011104040306.
Nikitaki Z, Velalopoulou A, Zanni V, Tremi I, Havaki S, Kokkoris M, Gorgoulis VG, Koumenis C, Georgakilas AG. Key biological mechanisms involved in high-LET radiation therapies with a focus on DNA damage and repair. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2022 Mar 31;24:e15. doi: 10.1017/erm.2022.6.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Phase I trial of alpha-particle immunotherapy with 225Ac-lintuzumab and low-dose cytarabine in patients age 60 or older with untreated acute myeloid leukemia.
Phase I Trial of Targeted Alpha-Particle Immunotherapy with Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33) and Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) in Older Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
API-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCT01756677
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: nct_alias
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.