A Trial to Evaluate Two Schedules of MS275 in Combination With 5AC in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT ID: NCT01305499
Last Updated: 2024-05-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-07-01
2024-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A recent study at Johns Hopkins University administered 5AC and entinostat in an overlapping schedule to patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMoL), and AML. The impressive results from this study have led to another phase II trial to further examine this drug combination versus 5AC alone in these patients. In this study, we want to see how the timing of when 5AC and entinostat are given affects the magnitude of the disease response.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Azacitidine Plus Phenylbutyrate in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
NCT00004871
5-Azacytidine With Lenalidomide in Patients With High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
NCT01038635
Azacitidine With or Without Entinostat in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00313586
Phase II Study of Azacitidine and Sargramostim as Maintenance Treatment for Poor-Risk AML or MDS
NCT01700673
Lintuzumab-Ac225 in Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients
NCT02575963
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. To estimate the overall response rate (complete, partial, and hematologic improvement- major by IWG criteria) following treatment with two different dose schedules of 5-Azacytidine and entinostat in patients with AML \>= 60 years old who are unable to tolerate or decline cytotoxic chemotherapy or those who have relapsed despite one prior regimen.
The secondary objectives of the study are:
1. To identify changes in gene promoter methylation and gene expression in response to combination therapy with 5AC and entinostat and compare the dynamics and kinetics of these alterations in promoter methylation and gene re-expression in the two different dosing schedules.
2. To evaluate the effect of entinostat on the induction of hyperacetylation of histones from peripheral blood and/or bone marrow samples.
3. To evaluate changes in DNA damage in response to combination therapy using gammaH2AX determination by western blotting.
4. To evaluate immune parameters after exposure to 5AC and entinostat when given at either dosing schedule and to evaluate these in relation to clinical outcomes.
5. To evaluate duration of response.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A: 5AC days 1-10 / entinostat days 3, 10
Arm A will be given an overlapping schedule of drugs with 5AC given at 50mg/m2 subcutaneously daily for 10 days on days 1 - 10 of a 28 day cycle and entinostat given at a flat dose of 8 mg orally on days 3 and 10.
Entinostat days 3, 10
Given orally on days 3, 10
5AC
B: 5AC days 1-10 / entinostat days 10,17
In Arm B the agents will be administered sequentially with 5AC given at 50mg/m2 subcutaneously daily for 10 days on days 1 - 10 of a 28 day cycle followed by entinostat at a 8 mg flat dose on days 10 and 17.
5AC
Entinostat days 10,17
Given orally on days 10, 17
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Entinostat days 3, 10
Given orally on days 3, 10
5AC
Entinostat days 10,17
Given orally on days 10, 17
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Untreated AML in (de novo or treatment related) patients in the following categories:
* Medical conditions that compromise the ability to give cytotoxic chemotherapy as the primary modality.
* Patients who decline cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Patients with AML who have relapsed despite one prior regimen
2. ECOG performance status 0, 1, or 2
3. Patients must not have untreated active infections at the time of study entry.
4. Normal organ function as defined below:
* Creatinine \< 2 mg/dl.
* Total serum bilirubin within institutional limits unless due to hemolysis, Gilbert's syndrome, or ineffective erythropoiesis.
* AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) ≤2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal.
5. Life expectancy of at least three months.
6. Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of the treatment, results that might be expected, and potential toxicities. They must be able to understand and give informed written consent according to federal and institutional guidelines.
7. Declined or ineligible for potentially curative options such as allogeneic stem cell transplant.
8. No chemotherapy or study drugs for \>3 weeks prior to starting study.
9. Women of childbearing potential should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant and men should be advised to not father a child while receiving treatment. All men and women of childbearing potential must use acceptable methods of birth control throughout the study as described below:
* Females of childbearing potential: Recommendation is for 2 effective contraceptive methods during the study. Adequate forms of contraception are double-barrier methods (condoms with spermicidal jelly or foam and diaphragm with spermicidal jelly or foam), oral, depo provera, or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine devices, and tubal ligation.
* Male patients with female partners who are of childbearing potential: Recommendation is for male and partner to use at least 2 effective contraceptive methods, as described above, during the study or to abstain.
Exclusion Criteria
* Treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including hematopoietic growth factors, \< 3 weeks prior to study registration. Exception: Hydroxyurea may be administered to patients with WBC \> 30,000/µL
* Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)
* Radiotherapy \< 4 weeks prior to study registration
* Failure to recover (to \< grade 1) from all adverse events associated with prior therapy.
* Valproic acid \< 2 weeks prior to study registration.
* Hypersensitivity to azacytidine, deoxyazacytidine, mannitol, entinostat or components of the entinostat tablet
* Any advanced malignant hepatic tumor(s)
2. Prior therapy with demethylating agents for leukemia treatment within the last four months.
3. Clinical evidence of CNS or pulmonary leukostasis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or central nervous system leukemia.
4. Serious or uncontrolled medical conditions.
5. Concurrent use of any other investigational agents.
6. Known HIV-positive patients.
7. Pregnancy or breast feeding
8. Male and female patients who are fertile who do not agree to use an effective barrier methods of birth control (i.e. abstinence) to avoid pregnancy during the study and for a minimum of 30 days after study treatment.
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hetty Carraway
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hetty Carraway
MD, MBA
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hetty Carraway, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-851
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CASE2914
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.