Combine TACE and RFA Versus TACE Alone for HCC With PVTT

NCT ID: NCT02301091

Last Updated: 2016-04-14

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: PHASE3
• Total Enrollment: 240 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2014-10-31
• Study Completion Date: 2019-10-31

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether combined radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) result in better survival outcomes than TACE alone in patients with HCC and portal vein tumor thrombus.

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the second most common cause of death from cancer globally. Although the development of imaging techniques has improved early HCC diagnosis, portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is still identified in 12.5-39.7% of HCC patients at their initial visits. Patients suffering from extremely aggressive HCC with PVTT have a median survival time of only 2.7-4.0 months if left untreated. The current standard of practice recommends sorafenib, which has been shown to prolong overall survival (OS) by nearly 3 months in advanced HCC patients and by 1.5-3.2 months in those with PVTT.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the main treatment modality for unresectable HCC patients. Some recent prospective studies have demonstrated that TACE can serve as a safe and effective procedure in selected HCC patients with PVTT. TACE is recommend for a part of patients with HCC and PVTT by the treatment guidelines in China and Japan. However,due to the poor blood supplement of PVTT,the local control rate of PVTT after TACE treatment is low. Besides,as to some hypovascular intrahepatic tumors, TACE also could not controlled effectively. As regard to the high local control rate of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for intrahepatic lesions and PVTT reported in some studies, we thus suggested that the combination of TACE and RFA might have higher tumor control rate and survival benefit than TACE alone.

We design this study to compare survival outcomes of TACE plus RFA and TACE alone in patients with HCC and PVTT.A total of 240 patients are needed according to statistician's calculation.They will be divided into two groups randomly by computer after sign the informed consent form.One group of patients received TACE plus RFA and the other group of patients received TACE alone.After treatment,patients will be followed-up on their survival, tumor response and adverse events.

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

TACE-RFA

2 times TACE first, RFA for residual viable tumors and PVTT within 1 month.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

TACE

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

TACE will be done according to the current method in our center. We use intra-injection of lipiodol mixed with pirarubicin,mitomycin and lobaplatin when the catheter was placed in the superselective location very close to the tumor. Gelfoam sponge was then injected to temporarily occlude the arterial blood flow.

RFA

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

For RFA, we used two commercially available system (Cool-Tip, Valleylab，USA) and (Octopus RF Systema，Starmed,Korea）with needle electrode with a 17-gauge internally cooled electrode.

pirarubicin,mitomycin and lobaplatin

Intervention Type: DRUG

They were cytotoxic drugs used in the TACE procedure.

TACE alone

repeated TACE and 1 to 2 months interval between two sessions of TACE.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TACE

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

TACE will be done according to the current method in our center. We use intra-injection of lipiodol mixed with pirarubicin,mitomycin and lobaplatin when the catheter was placed in the superselective location very close to the tumor. Gelfoam sponge was then injected to temporarily occlude the arterial blood flow.

pirarubicin,mitomycin and lobaplatin

Intervention Type: DRUG

They were cytotoxic drugs used in the TACE procedure.

Interventions

TACE

TACE will be done according to the current method in our center. We use intra-injection of lipiodol mixed with pirarubicin,mitomycin and lobaplatin when the catheter was placed in the superselective location very close to the tumor. Gelfoam sponge was then injected to temporarily occlude the arterial blood flow.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

RFA

For RFA, we used two commercially available system (Cool-Tip, Valleylab，USA) and (Octopus RF Systema，Starmed,Korea）with needle electrode with a 17-gauge internally cooled electrode.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

pirarubicin,mitomycin and lobaplatin

They were cytotoxic drugs used in the TACE procedure.

Intervention Type: DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization; Chemoembolization; Radiofrenquency ablation; RF ablation; cytotoxic drugs

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus in the first or second branch
• Refused sorafenib or could not tolerate the adverse effect of sorafenib
• A solitary HCC ≤ 5.0 cm in diameter, or multiple HCC ≤ 3 lesions, each ≤ 5.0 cm in diameter
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1
• Child-Pugh Score ≤ 8
• A platelet counts of > 60,000/mm3, hemoglobin>8.5 g/dL, prothrombin time prolong <6s
• Albumin >2.8 g/dL, total bilirubin <51.3 umol/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase（AST）<5 times of upper limit
• Sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

• Presence of extrahepatic metastasis except lymph node metastasis
• The blood supply of tumor lesions is absolutely poor or arterial-venous shunt that TACE can not be performed
• Uncontrolled or refractory ascites, ongoing variceal bleeding or encephalopathy;
• Severe heart, brain or kidney diseases
• Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from HCC
• Pregnant women or lactating women.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 75 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Ming Zhao

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Ming Zhao

Chief physician in Minimally Invasive Interventional Division,Medical Imaging Center,Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Ming Zhao, doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sun Yat-sen University

Locations

Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

China

Central Contacts

Ming Zhao, doctor

Role: CONTACT

zhaoming@sysucc.org.cn

+86 020 87343272

Facility Contacts

Ming Zhao, doctor

Role: primary

zhaoming@sysucc.org.cn

+86 020 87343272

Other Identifiers

2014-FXY-036

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id