Analysis of Joint Sounds in the Diagnosis of Knee Disorders

NCT ID: NCT02294045

Last Updated: 2021-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-20

Study Completion Date

2018-05-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical-noninvasive recording of sounds from the knees through a brief loaded range of motion. Description in phase 1 analytic but descriptive as well in phase 2. No samples other than a sound recording. The device is known microphone attached to the skin of the knee with elastic material. Sound recorded and analyzed on a lap top computer with Adobe software.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is a need for a less expensive and more universally available screening device for the knee, and other joint pathology. The equipment used for ultrasound is much less expensive and cumbersome than that of an x-ray or magnetic resonance imaging. The equipment we will use for the analysis of sound produced by the body itself is an order of magnitude less expensive than ultrasound; such as a laptop computer with currently available software and an inexpensive transducer. Analysis of sound has proved useful in Pulmonology and Cardiology. We believe sound analysis will provide a useful yet inexpensive tool for primary care physicians as well as musculoskeletal specialists.

Phase 1: Establish the normal sound patterns emanating from the uninjured knee; we will look for the influence of age, height and weight.

Phase 2: To record and analyze the preoperative sound patterns from the knees with pathology, known by MRI and arthroscopy, then compare them with the normal sounds from Phase 1.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthritis of Knee Normal Knee Knee Arthroscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Phase I

* Healthy Individuals.
* No neurological problems.
* No knee complaints.
* No previous Surgery or Knee injuries.

Phase II Patients undergoing knee arthroscopy who have pre-op MRI. The inclusion will be based on age group, 20 years of age, 40 and 60.

Exclusion Criteria

* Neurologic Disease
* Previous serious injury (Fracture or dislocation).
* Previous Ligament reconstruction.
* Major non-subtitle problems with their knees. (This would create overwhelming noises).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ludloff D. ie Auskultation der Wirbelsäule, des Kreuzbeins und des Reckens. Münchener medizinische wochenschrift, LIII, 1197, 1906. Walters CF. The Value of Joint Auscultation. In: The Lancet, 1:920-921. 1929. Rangayyan RM, Wu YF. Screening of Knee-Joint Vibroarthrographic Signals Using Statistical Parameters and Radial Basis Functions. In: Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 46 (3) 2008: pp. 223-232. Chu ML, Gradisar IA, Zavodney LD. Possible Clinical Application of a Noninvasive Monitoring Technique of Cartilage Damage in Pathological Knee Joints. In: Journal of Clinical Engineering 3 (1), 1978: pp. 19-27. McCoy GF, McCrea JD, Beverland DE, Kernohan WG, Mollan RAB. Vibration Arthrography as a Diagnostic Aid in Diseases of the Knee. In: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 69-B (2), 1987: pp. 288-293. Reddy NP, Rothschild BM, Mandal, M, Gupta V, Suryanarayanan S. Noninvasive Acceleration Measurements to Characterize Knee Arthritis and Chondromalacia. In: Annals of Biomedical Engineering, v. 23, pp. 78-84, 1995. Krishnan S, Rangayyan RM, Bell GD, Frank CB, and Ladly KO. Adaptive Filtering, Modeling, and Classification of Knee Joint Vibroarthrographic Signals for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Articular Cartilage Pathology. In: Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 35(6):677-684, 1997.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5120242

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non-Invasive Distractor During Knee Arthroscopy
NCT06458816 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Mymobility Knee ROM
NCT06863428 RECRUITING
LEGION™ Primary Safety and Efficacy
NCT04040985 TERMINATED NA