Comparing Clinical Outcome of 2 Different Total Knee Prostheses: Nexgen LPS-Flex Versus AGC
NCT ID: NCT00294528
Last Updated: 2006-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-01-31
2010-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We want to:
* determine whether an increased ROM is achieved with a high-flex knee compared to a standard knee
* and if so, does it matter
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients operated on with bilateral simultaneous TKR receive one of each prostheses but are blinded to which prosthesis is on which side. They have gait analyses performed preop and at intervals up to one year.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nexgen LPS-flex and AGC
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* preop ROM at least 120 degress flexion
* BMI below 30
* intact ligaments
Exclusion Criteria
* unable to understand language or purpose
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hvidovre University Hospital
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Henrik Husted, consultant
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
head of arthroplasty section
Kristian Stahl Otte, consultant
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
arthroplasty section
Gitte Holm, RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Head nurse of arthroplasty section
Helle Krogshøj Hansen, RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
nurse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
orthopedic department, section of arthroplasty, Hvidovre University Hospital
Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Kristian Stahl-Otte, consultant
Role: CONTACT
Phone: +45 36326037
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Henrik Husted, consultant
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Thomsen MG, Husted H, Otte KS, Holm G, Troelsen A. Do patients care about higher flexion in total knee arthroplasty? A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 8;14:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-127.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id