Stratification of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT02288949

Last Updated: 2018-10-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) and the Berlin definitions of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, but it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. Despite recent reports on the effects of standardized ventilator settings on PaO2/FIO2 and fulfillment of AECC and Berlin definitions of ARDS, it is still a matter of debate whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours is the most appropriate tool for stratifying lung severity in patients with ARDS. The investigators will perform an observational, multicenter, prospective audit in a network of intensive care units in Spain and China for validating and confirming that the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours after ARDS onset is the most valuable tool for stratifying and predicting outcome in patients with ARDS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In 1994, the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) defined ARDS as follows: 1) acute and sudden onset of severe respiratory distress, 2) bilateral infiltrates on frontal chest radiograph, 3) absence of left atrial hypertension or no clinical signs of left heart failure, and 4) severe hypoxemia, as PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<200 mmHg, regardless of FIO2 or PEEP levels. Although this definition could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. In 2012, a proposal for updating the ARDS definition (the Berlin criteria) was published and an empirical classification was proposed according to three PaO2/FiO2 cut-off values at ARDS onset: severe (≤100 mmHg), moderate (\>100-≤200), and mild (\>200-≤300) on PEEP≥5 cmH2O. However, despite that there is sufficient evidence about the interactions between PEEP and FiO2, the Berlin criteria did not mandate the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours under standarized guidelines.

The PaO2/FIO2 can be easily manipulated. Alterations in PEEP and FIO2 can dramatically change the PaO2/FIO2. Despite recent reports on the effects of standardized ventilator settings on PaO2/FIO2 and fulfillment of AECC definitions of ARDS, it is still a matter of debate whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours is the most appropriate tool for stratifying lung severity in patients with ARDS.

The investigators will examine whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 h after ARDS diagnosis under standard guidelines for ventilatory management have an impact on the stratification of lung severity and on predicting mortality of ARDS patients in the intensive care unit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prospective cohort

Stratification of patients admitted into a network of Spanish ICUs.

stratification

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will be stratified based on the values of relevant demographics, pulmonary and systemic variables in relation to mortality in the intensive care unit.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

stratification

Patients will be stratified based on the values of relevant demographics, pulmonary and systemic variables in relation to mortality in the intensive care unit.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients meeting the AECC definition for ARDS on PEEP greater or equal than 5 cmH2O (or the Berlin criteria for moderate and severe ARDS).

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Asociación Científica Pulmón y Ventilación Mecánica

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr. Negrin University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jesus Villar

Director, Multidisciplinary Organ Dysfunction Evaluation Research Network

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jesús Villar, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Virgen de la Luz

Cuenca, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Villar J, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Ambros A, Mosteiro F, Martinez D, Fernandez L, Soler JA, Parra L, Solano R, Soro M, Del Campo R, Gonzalez-Luengo RI, Civantos B, Montiel R, Pita-Garcia L, Vidal A, Anon JM, Ferrando C, Diaz-Dominguez FJ, Mora-Ordonez JM, Fernandez MM, Fernandez C, Fernandez RL, Rodriguez-Suarez P, Steyerberg EW, Kacmarek RM; Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies of ARDS (SIESTA) Network. Stratification for Identification of Prognostic Categories In the Acute RESpiratory Distress Syndrome (SPIRES) Score. Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 1;49(10):e920-e930. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005142.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34259448 (View on PubMed)

Villar J, Ambros A, Mosteiro F, Martinez D, Fernandez L, Ferrando C, Carriedo D, Soler JA, Parrilla D, Hernandez M, Andaluz-Ojeda D, Anon JM, Vidal A, Gonzalez-Higueras E, Martin-Rodriguez C, Diaz-Lamas AM, Blanco J, Belda J, Diaz-Dominguez FJ, Rico-Feijoo J, Martin-Delgado C, Romera MA, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Fernandez RL, Kacmarek RM; Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies of ARDS (SIESTA) Network. A Prognostic Enrichment Strategy for Selection of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Clinical Trials. Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):377-385. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003624.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30624279 (View on PubMed)

Villar J, Martinez D, Mosteiro F, Ambros A, Anon JM, Ferrando C, Soler JA, Montiel R, Vidal A, Conesa-Cayuela LA, Blanco J, Arrojo R, Solano R, Capilla L, Del Campo R, Civantos B, Fernandez MM, Aldecoa C, Parra L, Gutierrez A, Martinez-Jimenez C, Gonzalez-Martin JM, Fernandez RL, Kacmarek RM; Stratification and Outcome of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (STANDARDS) Network. Is Overall Mortality the Right Composite Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome? Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):892-899. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003022.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29420341 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ACPVM-2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.