ATI Evidence-based Guide Investigating Clinical Services
NCT ID: NCT02285868
Last Updated: 2019-07-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-11-30
2024-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Data are collected via the investigators proprietary electronic medical record system and are synthetic to the clinical process-that is, the data are collected in real-time with patients and the scores are immediately provided to the treating therapist as well as archived for later Registry and scientific use. Subsequent reporting can be risk adjusted to any variable collected which yields robust insights as to idiopathic patient conditions. However, no PHI information will be available.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Modified Rehabilitation Intervention for Working Persons With Arthritis
NCT01387100
Improving Motivation for Physical Activity in Arthritis Clinical Trial
NCT00248105
Physiotherapy-led Outpatient Clinic for Patients With Spondyloarthritis
NCT02098694
Home Based Computer Gaming Hand Exercise Regimen for People With Arthritis Affecting the Hands
NCT01635582
Effect of Exercise on the Disease Activity of Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT00792675
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In addition to the standard visit/data collection, patients in the AEGIS™ Registry will also be asked to complete a Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-12) and a standardized functional outcome instrument. Generally, the following will be available:
Patient Initial Assessment for Physical Therapy:
* De-identified Protected Health Information in accordance to 45 CFR 164.514
* Diagnosis and history Baseline functional outcome measure(s)
* DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand)
* Modified Oswestry (lumbar spine)
* Knee Outcome Survey
* Foot \& Ankle Ability Measure
* Lower Extremity Functional Scale
* Neck Disability Index Questionnaire
* Pain rating
* Global Rating of Change Scale
* Baseline Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-12)
Patient Start of Care:
* Patient information (age, BMI, sex, de-identified Protected Health Information in accordance to 45 CFR 164.514)
* Medical/surgical history
* Therapy review (diagnosis, therapy)
* Treatment plan
Ongoing Patient Assessment:
* De-identified Protected Health Information in accordance to 45 CFR 164.514
* Treatment plan update(s)
* Concurrent (every 10th visit) administration of functional outcome measure(s)
* Concurrent (every 10th visit) administration of Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-12)
* Patient Satisfaction
* Mailed to discharged patient within a week of discharge from physical therapy with a self-addressed, stamped return envelope Insurance Information
* Insurance carriers
* Insurance coverage
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm, Shoulder and Hand injuries
Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) via physical therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Lumbar spine injuries
Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Modified Oswestry (lumbar spine) via physical therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Knee injuries
Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Knee Outcome Survey via physical therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Foot and ankle injuries
Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Foot \& Ankle Ability Measure via physical therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Hip and lower extremity injuries
Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale via physical therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Neck injuries
Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire via physical therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Has no more than 2 visits/treatment experiences
* Is seen only for an evaluation
16 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ATI Holdings, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chris Stout, PsyD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ATI and College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ATI
Bolingbrook, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy; 2001.
Straus SE, Glasziou P, Richardson WS, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2011.
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032. No abstract available.
Bithell C. Evidence-based physiotherapy: Some thoughts on "best evidence". Physiotherapy. 2000; 86: 58-60.
Stillwell SB, Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Williamson KM. Evidence-based practice, step by step: asking the clinical question: a key step in evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs. 2010 Mar;110(3):58-61. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000368959.11129.79.
Bernhardsson S, Larsson ME. Measuring evidence-based practice in physical therapy: translation, adaptation, further development, validation, and reliability test of a questionnaire. Phys Ther. 2013 Jun;93(6):819-32. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120270. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
Wilt TJ. Uncertainty in prostate cancer care: the physician's role in clearing the confusion. JAMA. 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3258-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.24.3258. No abstract available.
Woolf SH. The need for perspective in evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 1999 Dec 22-29;282(24):2358-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.24.2358.
Croft P, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M. The pros and cons of evidence-based medicine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 1;36(17):E1121-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318223ae4c. No abstract available.
Sterne JA, Davey Smith G. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? BMJ. 2001 Jan 27;322(7280):226-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.226. No abstract available.
Risch NJ. Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature. 2000 Jun 15;405(6788):847-56. doi: 10.1038/35015718.
Jasny BR, Chin G, Chong L, Vignieri S. Data replication & reproducibility. Again, and again, and again .... Introduction. Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1225. doi: 10.1126/science.334.6060.1225. No abstract available.
Seligman MEP, Levant R. Managed care policies rely on inadequate science. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1998; 29: 211-212.
Lutz AD, Brooks JM, Chapman CG, Shanley E, Stout CE, Thigpen CA. Risk Adjustment of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index to Benchmark Physical Therapist Performance: Analysis From an Outcomes Registry. Phys Ther. 2020 Apr 17;100(4):609-620. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ATI EGIS01012015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.