Effective Pain Management of Interscalene Blocks During Shoulder Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02267044

Last Updated: 2018-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Shoulder replacement surgery is recognized as having the potential to cause a considerable amount of postoperative pain. Adequate management of pain after surgery is necessary not only to improve the patient's wellbeing but also to facilitate recovery. Several regional anesthesia techniques are available to combat postoperative pain in the shoulder replacement surgery patient, however, which method provides superior pain relief remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a continuous interscalene block versus a single shot interscalene block for postoperative pain relief in the shoulder replacement patient.

Patients undergoing shoulder replacement surgery will experience more effective pain relief with a continuous interscalene block versus and single shot interscalene block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. 76 patients receiving either primary total shoulder replacement, hemiarthroplasty, or reverse total shoulder replacement will be randomized to a regional anesthesia technique as part of their surgical procedure. 38 patients will receive a single shot interscalene block containing ropivicaine and 38 patients will receive a continuous interscalene block containing ropivicaine.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Primary Osteoarthritis, Unspecified Shoulder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ropivacaine Single Shot Block

Single Shot Interscalene block patients will receive a single shot of 30ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine prior to surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

The drug used for the interscalene blocks

Ropivacaine Continuous block

Continuous Interscalene block patients will receive a shot of up to 30ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine and then a catheter is placed. The catheter is secured with Dermabond and Tegaderm. Once surgery is complete, the catheter is connected to a pain ball system which holds 400ml of 0.2% Ropivacaine local anesthetic. The rate is locked in at 8ml/hr. Catheter is pulled once the pain ball is empty.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

The drug used for the interscalene blocks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

The drug used for the interscalene blocks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Naropin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Surgical candidate for primary total shoulder replacement, hemiarthroplasty, or reverse total shoulder replacement
* patient must be 18 years or older and willing to sign and date an Institutional Review Board informed consent form, and
* must be able to understand and agree to follow study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

* severe bronchopulmonary disease,
* oxygen dependent,
* existing nerve injury,
* BMI \> 40,
* coagulation disorders,
* allergy to ropivicaine,
* history of drug or alcohol abuse,
* American Academy of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification \> lll,
* pregnant women.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TriHealth Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Samer Hasan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cincinnati Sportsmedicine and Orthopaedic Center

Robert Rolf, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beacon Orthopaedic Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Good Samaritan Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Borgeat A, Tewes E, Biasca N, Gerber C. Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine after major shoulder surgery: PCIA vs PCA. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Oct;81(4):603-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.4.603.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9924240 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14061

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.