Trunk Motor Control Performance Before and After Spinal Manipulation Treatment

NCT ID: NCT02261246

Last Updated: 2019-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-01

Study Completion Date

2018-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall goal of this project is to develop sensitive and objective clinical research tools for the assessment of trunk motor control. In order to accomplish this goal, the investigators aim to quantify changes in trunk motor control before and after spinal manipulation treatment. The investigators hypothesize that trunk motor control will improve in the low back pain participants after 4-weeks of spinal manipulation treatment. Additionally, the investigators will compare position and force trunk motor control between healthy controls and low back pain patients. The investigators hypothesize that baseline tests of position and force trunk motor control will be better in healthy individuals than low back pain patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immediate treatment

This arm receives spinal manipulation treatment shortly after enrollment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal manipulation treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Up to 4 sessions of spinal manipulation treatment (once per week).

Delayed treatment

This arm receives spinal manipulation treatment approximately 4 weeks after enrollment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal manipulation treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Up to 4 sessions of spinal manipulation treatment (once per week).

Healthy control (no low back pain)

In this arm, healthy controls are tested at baseline.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal manipulation treatment

Up to 4 sessions of spinal manipulation treatment (once per week).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 21-65 years
* Independently ambulatory
* Able to speak and read English
* Able to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study.


* Willing to be randomized to either immediate or delayed treatment group.
* Musculoskeletal pain - primarily in the lumbar region
* Pain rating greater or equal to 3 out of 10 as indicated on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain
* Back Disability greater or equal to 26% as indicated on the Oswestry Disability Index

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability or unwillingness of individual to give written informed consent.
* Physical therapy or any other form of manual medicine (e.g., Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, Chiropractic Manipulation, etc.), acupuncture or spinal injections within one month prior to study enrollment
* Workers' compensation benefits in the past 3 months or ongoing medical legal issues
* Possibly pregnant
* Extreme obesity (BMI\>36)
* Currently using electrical implants (e.g., cardiac pacemakers, drug delivery pumps, etc.)

History of:

* Spinal surgery
* Spinal fracture
* Spinal infection (e.g., osteomyelitis)
* Cancer

Unresolved symptoms from:

* Head trauma
* Inner ear infection with associated balance and coordination problems
* Orthostatic hypotension
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Vestibular disorder (e.g. vertigo)

Current diagnosis of:

* Significant spinal deformity (e.g., scoliosis \> 20 degrees, torticollis)
* Ankylosing spondylitis
* Spondylolisthesis grades III or IV
* Cauda equine syndrome
* Rheumatoid arthritis
* Osteoporosis
* Angina or congestive heart failure symptoms
* Active bleeding or infection in the back
* Blindness
* Seizures
* Neurologic disease (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke or transient ischemic attack in the past year, cervical dystonia)

Conditions recognized by a physician any time during the study:

* Significant or worsening signs of neurologic deficit
* Symptoms are not consistent with mechanical findings
* Other conditions impeding protocol implementation

Below is an additional exclusion criterion for healthy control participants:

• Based on the minimal clinically important difference of 2 points (Childs et al., 2005), "healthy controls" with 2 points or greater pain on NRS will not be eligible to participate.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Michigan State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jacek Cholewicki

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Norman P Reeves, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sumaq Life LLC

Jacek Cholewicki, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Michigan State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MSU Osteopathic Manual Medicine

East Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

MSU Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan State University Center for Orthopedic Research

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Reeves NP, Popovich JM Jr, Priess MC, Cholewicki J, Choi J, Radcliffe CJ. Reliability of assessing trunk motor control using position and force tracking and stabilization tasks. J Biomech. 2014 Jan 3;47(1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24262851 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://orthopedicresearch.msu.edu/

Website for Michigan State University Center for Orthopedic Research

http://nccam.nih.gov/

Website for the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Sponsor)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5U19AT006057-02

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

NCCAM U19 AT006057 Project 2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.