Classic Cesarean Section Versus Minimally Invasive Cesarean Section: Pain Assessment
NCT ID: NCT02257255
Last Updated: 2015-05-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The most used technique of cesarean section is the known as Pfannenstiel or Classical technique. In 1996, a new technique was described, called Misgav Ladach or minimally invasive technique.
Several studies have show that the minimally invasive technique is faster and promotes lower costs and less intraoperative bleeding. There is no current evidence that this technique is less painful.
This study aims to compare the postoperative pain in both techniques,by means of two pain scales: a one-dimensional scale, the Visual Analogue Scale, and a multidimensional scale, the McGill Scale.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Novel Analgesic Method for Postoperative Pain Relief After Cesarean Section: Intraoperative Superior Hypogastric Block
NCT03897764
Best Incision in Cesarean Section of Obese Women
NCT06032637
Transverse Supraumbilical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision For Cesarean Section In Morbidly Obese Women
NCT05385276
The Effect of Abdominal Binder Use on Postpartum Pain, Bleeding, and Breastfeeding Success in Cesarean Delivery Women
NCT04965779
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block After Cesarean Delivery
NCT03811067
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary, clinical, prospective, randomized, double blind with, controlled, two parallel groups interventional and analytical.
2. MATERIAL
A-CALCULATION OF SAMPLE SIZE
Were used to calculate the size of the sample study data Antalon et al. (2001), who also compared the two techniques of caesarean section, and the Student's t-test was used bi flow. Considering a standard deviation of 1.5 points in the Visual Analog Pain Scale, and significant a difference of two points, the calculated number of patients per group was 15, with a significance level of 5% and power of 95 test %.
C RANDOMIZATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY OF ALLOCATION
The allocation will be determined by random sequence generated by computer (BioStat 5.0 software, Mamiraua Institute, Brazil). The sequence had been held by the researcher who will make allocation of patients to groups in caesarean Pfannenstiel or Misgav-Ladach, 15 in each group.
D-PROCEDURES
ANESTHESIA:
In both groups will be performed spinal anesthesia at L2-L4 with heavy bupivacaine 13 mg and morphine 0.1 mg% standardized by the Anesthesiology Service of HCSL.
SURGICAL PROCEDURE:
Surgical procedure (classical technique)
Once displayed, according to the behavior of the service, this will be performed according to the following surgical technique:
* Traditional Preparation: pubic shaving, prior bladder emptying.
* Asepsis with degerminate clorhexidine and alcoholic
* The transverse abdominal incision approximately 10 cm, 3-4 cm above the pubic symphysis.
* Cross Opening subcutaneous tissue.
* Opening Aponeurosis transversely, hemostasis of bleeding vessels.
* Separation by dissection of the anterior rectus sheath muscles of the abdomen to the umbilicus.
* Separation of the muscles of the median raphe manually, exposure, clamping and opening the parietal peritoneum with scissors longitudinally.
* Opening of the visceral peritoneum transversely with scissors, taking off the bladder from the uterus.
* Hysterotomy segment transverse, arcuate, superior concavity, made a small incision with a scalpel and that is complete with Kelly forceps to reach the uterine cavity and then enlarging it with fingers without taking off the bladder from the uterus.
* Disposal of amniotic fluid. fetal extraction, using the leverage if necessary.
* Clamping of the umbilical cord and immediate care to the newborn.
* Administration of cefazolin 2g IV and 10 IU oxytocin.
* Afterbirth and revision of the uterine cavity.
* Hysterorrhaphy with Catgut chrome one in a continuous suture not anchored.
* Visceral peritonization simple catgut and 2-0 suture in simple running suture.
* Revision of the abdominal cavity.
* Closure of the parietal peritoneum and with simple catgut 2-0 suture in simple running suture.
* Closing the muscular plane is separated into "U", with simple catgut fioa 2-0 points.
* Closing the aponeurosis chrome catgut sutures in one not anchored.
* Approximation of the subcutaneous tissue with 2-0 catgut simple in separate points.
* Skin closure is made with nylon suture with 4-0 points Donati modified.
* Dressing kept simple in the early hours.
Surgery (minimally invasive technique)
Once displayed, according to the behavior of the service, this will be performed according to the following surgical technique:
* Traditional Preparation: pubic shaving, prior bladder emptying.
* Asepsis and degermante with alcoholic chlorhexidine.
* The transverse abdominal incision approximately 10 cm, 3-4 cm above the pubic symphysis.
* Cross Opening subcutaneous tissue with electrocautery used in clotting.
* Opening Aponeurosis transversely, hemostasis of bleeding vessels.
* Separation of the Muscles of the median raphe manually, exposure, clamping the parietal peritoneum, small opening with scissors. Through digital dilatation peritoneum is opened across the entire length of the incision.
* Hysterotomies Segment transverse, arcuate, superior concavity, made a small incision with a scalpel and that is complete with Kelly forceps to reach the uterine cavity and then enlarging it with fingers without taking off the bladder from the uterus.
* Disposal of amniotic fluid. Fetal extraction, using the leverage if necessary.
* Clamping of the umbilical cord and immediate care to the newborn.
* Administration of cefazolin 1 g IV and 10 IU oxytocin.
* And revision of the uterine cavity.
* Hysterorrhaphy with Catgut chrome one in a continuous suture not anchored.
* Revision of the abdominal cavity.
* Closing the aponeurosis chrome catgut sutures in one not anchored.
* Approximation of the subcutaneous tissue with 2-0 catgut simple in separate points.
* Skin closure is made with nylon suture with 4-0 points Donati modified.
* Dressing kept simple in the early hours\]. Postoperative medication
* Intravenous hydration with 1000 ml of glucose 5% and 500 ml of 0.9% saline solution in drip 60 drops / minute.
* Use (dimethicone) every 8 hours the first dose at 12 hours postoperatively.
* Use of analgesic and anti-spasmodic every 6 hours if needed (Buscopan composts® (scopolamine butylbromide 20mg and dipyrone 2.5 mg).
F-STATISTICAL METHOD The data will be tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis. The level of rejection of the null hypothesis will be set at 5% (α \<0.05).
For numeric variables will be used descriptive statistics, with calculations of median, mean and deviation padrão.O Mann-Whitney test is used to compare two independent groups with nonparametric behavior and the chi-square test for categorical variables.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pfannenstiel cesarean section
Women in 36 to 40 weeks of pregnancy undergoing first cesarean section by Pfannenstiel technique. Pain assessment on postoperative hours 6, 12 and 24.
Pfannenstiel cesarean section
Pain scales ( VAS and McGill ) 6, 12 and 24 hours after cesarean to pain assessment
Misgav-Ladach cesarean section
Women in 36 to 40 weeks of pregnancy undergoing first cesarean section by minimally invasive technique. Pain assessment on postoperative hours 6, 12 and 24.
Misgav-Ladach cesarean section
Pain scales (VAS and McGill) 6, 12 and 24 hours ater cesarean to pain assessment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pfannenstiel cesarean section
Pain scales ( VAS and McGill ) 6, 12 and 24 hours after cesarean to pain assessment
Misgav-Ladach cesarean section
Pain scales (VAS and McGill) 6, 12 and 24 hours ater cesarean to pain assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergency cesarean section, due to placenta previa, fetal distress, cord prolapse or other obstetric emergencies;
* Pregnancies below 36 weeks.
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade do Vale do Sapucai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ivanildo Archangelo Junior
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
IVANILDO ARCHANGELO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNIVERSIDADE DO VALE DO SAPUCAÍ
Daniela F Veiga, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ivanildo Archangelo Jr
Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
cesarean
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.