Neonatal Acid-Base Status After C Section With Maternal Tilt vs. Supine

NCT ID: NCT02243423

Last Updated: 2016-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to compare the neonatal acid-base status of women who remain supine horizontal, with women who are tilted to the left side by 15° during elective cesarean delivery at term under spinal anesthesia, with systolic BP maintained at baseline with a phenylephrine (PE) infusion. The null hypothesis is that the position of the patient (supine horizontal or tilted) during cesarean section will make no difference to neonatal wellbeing. The primary outcome will be the neonatal umbilical arterial base deficit (BD) at birth. The investigators will also examine the effects of maternal position during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia on maternal cardiac output (CO) and whether these changes have a correlation with the neonatal umbilical cord blood acid-base status. The secondary outcome will be the total phenylephrine dose requirement at 15 minutes after spinal injection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methods: This will be a randomized trial structured as an equivalence trial. Subjects will be American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II women aged ≥18 years, non-laboring, at term (\>37 weeks gestation) with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation, scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Patients will receive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the sitting position, after which they will lay either supine horizontal or the surgical table will be tilted to the left by 15°, depending on the group to which they were randomized (SUPINE or TILT). An IV phenylephrine infusion will be administered to maintain systolic BP at baseline until delivery. A noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring system (NICOM, Cheetah Medical Inc., Vancouver, WA, USA) will continuously monitor CO and stroke volume. Neonatal umbilical vein and arterial blood gas results will be recorded.The null hypothesis is that the position of the patient (supine horizontal or tilted) during cesarean section will make no difference to neonatal wellbeing.

Statistical Design: The estimated sample size is the minimum number of study subjects required for rejecting the alternative hypothesis (i.e., accepting the null hypothesis). A significant difference between groups in the primary outcome, umbilical artery BD (which is a measure of fetal well being at the time of delivery and an indirect indicator of the adequacy of uteroplacental perfusion) would be of the order of magnitude of 2 mmol/L. Standard deviation of BD tends to be of this magnitude also. It would therefore require 22 subjects per group for 90% power to detect this magnitude of difference with alpha 0.05. Because BD is often not normally distributed, it is appropriate to increase sample size by 10-20%, and because the investigators have important secondary outcomes (PE usage, UA and UV pH, UV BD) the investigators intend to recruit 50 subjects per group to allow sufficient power for analysis of these secondary outcomes with appropriate correction for multiple comparisons, and allowing for 10% dropout. PE usage in the investigators previous study tends to have a standard deviation of about 30% of the mean, also roughly the magnitude of a clinically significant difference.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortocaval Compression Fetal Acidosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SUPINE group

The surgical table will remain horizontal after intrathecal (spinal) anesthesia injection for cesarean section. Choosing to position the patient supine is the intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SUPINE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in the SUPINE group will receive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the sitting position, after which they will lay supine horizontal on the surgical table.

A phenylephrine intravenous infusion will be titrated according to a set protocol, to maintain the systolic blood pressure at baseline.

TILT group

The surgical table will be turned to 15° of left lateral tilt after patients are laid supine after spinal anesthesia injection. The tilted group is the control group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TILT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the sitting position, after which they will lay on the surgical table, which will be tilted to the left by 15°.

A phenylephrine intravenous infusion will be titrated according to a set protocol to maintain the systolic blood pressure at baseline.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SUPINE

Patients in the SUPINE group will receive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the sitting position, after which they will lay supine horizontal on the surgical table.

A phenylephrine intravenous infusion will be titrated according to a set protocol, to maintain the systolic blood pressure at baseline.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TILT

Patients will receive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the sitting position, after which they will lay on the surgical table, which will be tilted to the left by 15°.

A phenylephrine intravenous infusion will be titrated according to a set protocol to maintain the systolic blood pressure at baseline.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I and II women aged ≥18 years
* Non-laboring
* At term (\>37 weeks gestation) with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation
* Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
* Maternal height will be between 150 - 180 cm and the body mass index (BMI)≤ 40 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria

* Ruptured membranes
* Severe polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios
* Nonreassuring fetal heart rate
* Intrauterine growth restriction
* Abnormal lie - e.g. breech, transverse lie
* Multiple gestation
* Maternal comorbidities: hypertension, preeclampsia, other cardiovascular disease, renal failure, diabetes mellitus\> 10 years, severe scoliosis or kyphosis, uterine abnormalities (e.g. large fibroids, bicornuate uterus)
* Medications - anti-hypertensive agents
* Current smoking or illicit drug use
* Failed spinal (sensory level \< T6 after 15 minutes), need to convert to general anesthesia before delivery (exclusion from data analysis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Richard M. Smiley

Virginia Apgar Professor of Anesthesiology at Columbia University Medical Center

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Smiley, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York Presbyterian, Allen Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lee SW, Khaw KS, Ngan Kee WD, Leung TY, Critchley LA. Haemodynamic effects from aortocaval compression at different angles of lateral tilt in non-labouring term pregnant women. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;109(6):950-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes349. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23059960 (View on PubMed)

Crawford JS, Burton M, Davies P. Time and lateral tilt at Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1972 May;44(5):477-84. doi: 10.1093/bja/44.5.477. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 5044078 (View on PubMed)

Cluver C, Novikova N, Hofmeyr GJ, Hall DR. Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD007623. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007623.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23543552 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAO1851

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.