First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme and Resolute Integrity in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT02236975
Last Updated: 2020-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
168 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 9 and 12 months post-stent implantation. All patients will undergo repeat angiography at 9 months follow-up. QCA assessment will be performed at baseline (pre- and post-procedure) and at 9 months follow-up.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PIONEER III Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the BuMA Supreme™ Drug Coated Coronary Stent in Patients With Coronary Disease
NCT03168776
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BuMA Supreme Drug Eluting Stent(DES)
NCT02698839
Safety and Efficacy Study of the Svelte Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent Delivery System
NCT01788150
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BuMA Supreme Drug Eluting Stent(DES)
NCT02698852
Test Efficacy of Biodegradable and Permanent Limus-Eluting Stents
NCT01068106
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system
Implant BuMA Supreme stent only
BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system
Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
Implant Resolute stent
Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system
Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive territorial functional study.
3. Documented stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification 1, 2, 3 or 4) or unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald Class IB-C, IIB-C, or IIIB-C), or documented silent ischemia
4. The patient has a planned intervention of a single de-novo lesion in one or two separate major epicardial territories (LAD, LCX or RCA).
5. Diameter Stenosis≥50 and\<100%.
6. The visually estimated target lesion must be able to be covered by a single BuMA Supreme stent or a single Resolute Integrity stent (for available sizes refer to tables 1 and 2, page 20 and 21).
7. The target lesion reference diameter must be visually estimated to be ≥2.5 mm and ≤4.5 mm in diameter.
8. Written informed consent.
9. The patient agrees to the follow-up visits including a 9 month angiographic follow-up.
10. Patient must have completed the follow-up phase of any previous study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of ongoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ECG and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (according to local standard hospital practice) have not returned within normal limits at the time of procedure
3. Patient suffered from stroke/TIA during the last 6 months.
4. LVEF \<30%
5. Platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or \>400,000 cells/mm3, a WBC of \<3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis)
6. Known renal insufficiency (e.g. serum creatinine \>2.5mg/dL, or creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min), or subject on dialysis, or acute kidney failure (as per physician judgment).
7. Patient undergoing planned surgery within 6 months with the necessity to stop DAPT.
8. Patient requiring oral anticoagulation (Coumadin, Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC))
9. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
10. The patient is a recipient of a heart transplant
11. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, antiplatelet medication specified for use in the study, sirolimus, zotarolimus, or cobalt-chromium.
12. Other medical illness (e.g. cancer, stroke with neurological deficiency) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin etc.) as per physician judgment that may cause non-compliance with the protocol or confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy
13. The patient is simultaneously participating in another investigational device or drug study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clemens von.Birgelen, MD,Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST), Enschede, the Netherlands
Manel Sabate, MD,Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinic university hospital Barcelona, Spain
Patrick W.Serruys, MD,Phd
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Interventional Cardiology, Thorax center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Imelda Hospital
Bonheiden, , Belgium
CHU Chaleroi
Chaleroi, , Belgium
Oost-limburg Hospital
Genk, , Belgium
AMC
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
OLVG
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
UMCG
Groningen, , Netherlands
Maasstad Hospital
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Hospita; Garcia de Orta
Almada, , Portugal
Santa Maria University Hospital
Lisbon, , Portugal
Gaia/Espinho Hospital Centers
Porto, , Portugal
University Hospital Madrid
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
Vigo, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wang R, Kawashima H, Hara H, Gao C, Ono M, Takahashi K, Tu S, Soliman O, Garg S, van Geuns RJ, Tao L, Wijns W, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Comparison of Clinically Adjudicated Versus Flow-Based Adjudication of Revascularization Events in Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Nov;14(11):e008055. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008055. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PIONEER
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.