Randomized Comparison of ExoSeal® and Angio-Seal Vascular Closure Devices: The CLOSE-UP II Trial

NCT ID: NCT02234830

Last Updated: 2017-06-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

818 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-21

Study Completion Date

2017-05-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Is the ExoSeal VSD non-inferior to Angio-Seal vascular closure device (VSD) in the incidence of adverse access site related events at 30 days.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled, single blind, single center study in 2000 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients comparing the ExoSeal VCD (test device) to the AngioSeal VCD (standard comparator). In-hospital and 30 days safety and efficacy endpoints and 6 months safety endpoints will be reported.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exoseal closure device

Closure device for femoral artery access closure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exoseal closure device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Closure device for femoral artery access closure

Angio-Seal closure device

Closure device for femoral artery access closure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Angioseal closure device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Closure device for femoral artery access closure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exoseal closure device

Closure device for femoral artery access closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Angioseal closure device

Closure device for femoral artery access closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Should be able to provide valid informed signed consent
* PCI procedure including treatment by balloon and/or stent
* PCI indicated by silent ischemia, stable angina pectoris, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Exclusion Criteria

* Only coronary angiography
* Multiple punctures
* Active infection
* Groin haematoma before the closure procedure
* Sheath size \> 7 French
* Known pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous (AV)-fistula in the ipsilateral groin
* Prior arterial surgery in abdomen and/or lower extremities
* Cardiogenic shock
* Life expectancy less than one year
* The patient is a female of childbearing potential with possible pregnancy or a positive pregnancy test within 7 days before the index procedure or is lactating
* Simultaneous or planned subsequent femoral vein access
* Allergy to any of the components in the closure material left in the groin
* Puncture on same site \< 30 days
* Peripheral artery disease patients can be included at operator´s discretion except if heavy calcification is present at the access site which at the operator's discretion precludes insertion of the VCD
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cordis Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Evald Hoej Christiansen

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Evald H Christiansen, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Arhus University Hospital Skejby

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus N, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1-10-72-68-12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Zenith® Dissection Clinical Trial
NCT01568320 COMPLETED NA