Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Ensure Medical Vascular Closure Device
NCT ID: NCT00345631
Last Updated: 2012-06-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
488 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-02-28
2007-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ECLIPSE Feasibility Trial (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial) EU
NCT00574691
The Merit WRAPSODY™ Endovascular Stent Graft
NCT03644017
A Study of the Temporary Spur Stent for the Treatment of Narrowing and Blockages in the Arteries Below the Knee
NCT03807531
Ellipsys Vascular Access System Registry
NCT03454113
The ENTERPRISE Study - Study of the Enterprise Self-Expanding Stent System
NCT00288405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Ensure Medical Vascular Closure device (VCD) is intended for femoral artery puncture site closure in patients who have undergone coronary or peripheral diagnostic or interventional procedure using a standard 6F introducer sheath. The device is comprised of a bio-absorbable plug and a plug delivery system. The plug delivery system is designed to position the bio-absorbable plug to the extravascular surface of the femoral artery access site, facilitating a hemostasis response. The Ensure Medical VCD has been studied in a prior feasibility trial of 149 patients, which demonstrated that: (1) the device could be used to successfully obtain rapid hemostasis and early ambulation in patients undergoing catheterization procedures; and (2) the low incidence and relatively minor nature of the observed closure related complications suggests that the device is safe for its intended purpose.
The ECLIPSE Trial is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Ensure Medical VCD in comparison to standard manual compression. Patients will be randomly assigned to have their arterial access site closed using either manual compression or the VCD. The principal comparisons of the two closure techniques will include:
* Time required to obtain hemostasis of the vascular access site
* Time required for the patient to ambulate after their catheterization
* Frequency of occurrence of serious closure-related complications
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Manual Compression
Manual compression (MC)
Manual Compression
Manual compression
Vascular Closure Device
Vascular Closure Device (VCD)
Vascular Closure Device
Investigational vascular closure device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Manual Compression
Manual compression
Vascular Closure Device
Investigational vascular closure device
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to undergo emergent vascular surgery if a complication requires it
* 6F arterial puncture located in the common femoral artery
* Femoral artery has a lumen diameter of at least 5 mm
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior target artery closure with any vascular closure device, or closure with manual compression within 30 days prior to catheterization
* Patients who bruise or bleed easily or with a history of significant bleeding or platelet disorders
* Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 48 hours prior to catheterization
* Uncontrolled hypertension at time of vessel closure
* Elevated Activated Clotting Time at time of vessel closure
* Ineligible for in-catheterization lab introducer sheath removal
* Concurrent participation in another investigational device or drug trial
* Thrombolytic therapy, bivalirudin, other thrombin-specific anticoagulants, or low molecular weight heparin within 24 hours prior to catheterization
* Preexisting hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, or pseudoaneurysm at the vessel access site prior to femoral artery closure
* Prior femoral vascular surgery or vascular graft in region of access site
* Femoral artery is tortuous or requires an introducer sheath longer than 11 cm
* Fluoroscopically visible calcium, atherosclerotic disease, or stent within 1 cm of the puncture site that would interfere with the operation of the experimental device
* Difficulty in obtaining vascular access resulting in multiple arterial punctures and/or posterior arterial puncture
* Antegrade vascular puncture
* Body Mass Index over 40 kg/m\^2
* Symptomatic leg ischemia in the target limb including severe claudication or weak/absent pulse
* Femoral artery diameter stenosis exceeding 50%
* Pre-existing severe non-cardiac systemic disease or terminal illness
* Planned arterial access at the same access site within 30 days of catheterization
* Extended hospitalization (e.g. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery)
* Pre-existing systemic or cutaneous infection
* Prior use of an intra-aortic balloon pump through the arterial access site
* Cardiogenic shock during or immediately following the catheterization
* Patient is unable to ambulate at baseline
* Patient is known or suspected to be pregnant or is lactating
* Patient is unavailable for follow-up
* Any angiographic or clinical evidence that the physician feels would place the patient at increased risk with the use of the experimental device
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cordis Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ensure Medical
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
S. Chiu Wong, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Sutter Memorial Hospital
Sacramento, California, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Morton Plant Hosptial
Clearwater, Florida, United States
The Care Group
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Washington University School of Medicine at Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Cooper Health Systems
Camden, New Jersey, United States
SJH Cardiology Associates
Liverpool, New York, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital - Cornell Medical College of Cornell University
New York, New York, United States
Wake Heart Research
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Hahnemann Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Moffitt Heart & Vascular Group
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, United States
LDS Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wong SC, Bachinsky W, Cambier P, Stoler R, Aji J, Rogers JH, Hermiller J, Nair R, Hutman H, Wang H; ECLIPSE Trial Investigators. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):785-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.06.006.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EM0501
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.