Effectiveness of a Computerised Prompt for Primary and Secondary Care Physicians to Refer or Refer Back Type 2 Diabetes Patients
NCT ID: NCT02229110
Last Updated: 2015-06-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2779 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Our hypotheses is that when we improve triage we can cause a major shift from treatment in secondary care to primary care and from primary care to self-care by using the patient web portal. Furthermore, patients who needs extra attention due to problems with their diabetes or complications can receive this extra attention due to increased e-consultation between primary care and secondary care and if necessary actually can, during a short time, be treated by an internist. We hope to achieve this by introducing a signal in the electronic medical record. This signal allocates patients according to the guidelines and warns a physician if their patients is not treated according to that guideline. The health care provider can then discuss this situation with his patient. We believe that this leads to shift in allocation of care, in which optimal care is provided and patients are made more aware of their situation which hopefully leads to better self-management and satisfaction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Utilizing Off-the-shelf Technology to Improve Diabetes Management in a Rural Population
NCT03105011
Electronic Feedback on Diabetic Care to General Practitioners
NCT01009528
Internet Intervention to Improve Rural Diabetes Care
NCT00403091
Lifestyle Monitoring and Coaching Using the Mobile DIAMETER Application in Secondary Care
NCT05307120
Provider-Initiated Regular Remote Interventions for Optimal Type 2 Diabetes Care
NCT01920256
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Signal
In addition to usual care, there will be an automatic signal in the electronic medical record (EMR) upon opening that will show the reader that the patient is currently not treated in the correct treatment setting and it simultaneously will give advice to which treatment allocation this patient should be transferred to.
Signal
Automatic signal in the electronic medical record
No signal
Patients receive usual care, consisting of 4 office visits yearly
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Signal
Automatic signal in the electronic medical record
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* health care provider work within Diamuraal setting
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. G.E.H.M. Rutten
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guy EH Rutten, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Lioe-Ting Dijkhorst-Oei, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
UMC Utrecht
Maaike CM Ronda, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Diamuraal-associated GP practices
Amersfoort, , Netherlands
Meander Medical Center
Amersfoort, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ronda MC, Dijkhorst-Oei LT, Gorter KJ, Beulens JW, Rutten GE. Differences between diabetes patients who are interested or not in the use of a patient Web portal. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Jul;15(7):556-63. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0023. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-039/C
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.