Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
205 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2010-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Remotely Delivered Mindfulness-Based Diabetes Education
NCT06312553
Southeastern Diabetes Initiative Clinical Intervention
NCT01965639
Clinic to Community Navigation to Improve Diabetes Outcomes
NCT03474731
Tablet-Aided BehavioraL Intervention EffecT on Self-management Skills
NCT02128854
Effectiveness of a Computerised Prompt for Primary and Secondary Care Physicians to Refer or Refer Back Type 2 Diabetes Patients
NCT02229110
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives. (1) Assess barriers to implementation of diabetes guidelines and identify solutions through focus groups and case-based vignette surveys; (2) Develop and implement an interactive Internet intervention including individualized physician performance feedback; (3) Evaluate the intervention in a randomized controlled trial; and (4) Examine the sustainability of improved guideline adherence once feedback ceases.
Methods. In partnership with the University of Alabama rural medicine program, we will randomize 200 rural physician offices to an intervention or comparison arm. Our 18-month intervention, customized to the individual physician in real-time, consists of Internet learning modules with case-based education, performance feedback, and benchmarks. The comparison group will receive a text-based, non-interactive Internet posting of publicly available resources. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants from the offices of study physicians may also participate in the Internet modules. Outcomes will be based on previously developed and validated quality measures for diabetes. The intervention will cover screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Performance feedback will include 10-15 charts per intervention physician. The main analysis, conducted at the physician level, will compare differential improvement in guideline adherence between the study arms. Ancillary analyses will examine the effects of physician characteristics, other providers in the office, and patient characteristics (e.g., comorbidities, ethnicity, gender, age, and socioeconomic status). Multivariable techniques will adjust for repeated measures, clustering of patients within physicians, and multiple providers within a single office.
Study Population. RDOC will enroll 200 physicians from rural Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Arkansas, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Missouri, and West Virginia. Participating physicians will be randomized to receive the intervention or to a comparison group, which will receive traditional, text-based continuing medical education (CME). Each participating physician will allow two rounds of medical record abstraction to be conducted in his/her office. Results from the medical record review: (1) be used in the intervention to provide physicians with personal performance feedback and (2) used to examine change in performance for the intervention and comparison physicians as an evaluation of the entire study.
Significance. This study offers a technologically advanced, theory-grounded intervention for improving care of a high-risk, underserved population. With expertise in translating research into practice, rural medicine, behavioral medicine, health informatics, and clinical diabetes, our multidisciplinary team has a proven record of collaboration. This project will produce an evidence-based and replicable intervention that can be sustained in the "real world," and easily modified for other diseases. This project is substantially improved after making important changes recommended in the second review.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Internet Intervention
Internet-based intervention aims to improve guideline adherence by rural physicians caring for adult patients with type 2 diabetes.
Control
Control
The comparison group will receive a text-based, non-interactive Internet posting of publicly available resources.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Internet Intervention
Internet-based intervention aims to improve guideline adherence by rural physicians caring for adult patients with type 2 diabetes.
Control
The comparison group will receive a text-based, non-interactive Internet posting of publicly available resources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
UAB
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeroan J Allison, MD, MS Epi
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Safford MM, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI. Patient complexity: more than comorbidity. the vector model of complexity. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):382-90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0307-0.
Safford MM, Shewchuk R, Qu H, Williams JH, Estrada CA, Ovalle F, Allison JJ. Reasons for not intensifying medications: differentiating "clinical inertia" from appropriate care. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22(12):1648-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0433-8. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
Foster PP, Williams JH, Estrada CA, Higginbotham JC, Voltz ML, Safford MM, Allison J. Recruitment of rural physicians in a diabetes internet intervention study: overcoming challenges and barriers. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Feb;102(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30497-1.
Billue KL, Safford MM, Salanitro AH, Houston TK, Curry W, Kim Y, Allison JJ, Estrada CA. Medication intensification in diabetes in rural primary care: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial. BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 17;2(5):e000959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000959. Print 2012.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Rural Diabetes Online Care Project Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
X050111012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.