Prospective Trial of Alerting to Extended Hypotensive Exposures on Long-Term Outcome After Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02217969

Last Updated: 2018-03-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-31

Study Completion Date

2023-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients undergoing anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery will be randomized to either having their anesthesia team alerted or kept blinded to extended periods of less than normal blood pressure with the goal of studying if providing these alerts leads to improved outcome after surgery (lower risk of death or complication in the days and weeks following surgery).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

We recently identified a significant association of postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality with the concept of "hypotensive exposures" during anaesthesia. Specifically, we found in approximately 160,000 patients from 3 institutions (Cleveland Clinic, Vanderbilt University and Saint Louis University) that roughly every third adult patient undergoing a non-cardiac procedure under anaesthesia experienced twice the 30-day all-cause mortality portended by extended cumulative periods of less than normal intraoperative blood pressure. This association was independent of co-morbidity (Charlson Co-morbidity index), causing the same relative increase in mortality in "healthy" as in "sick" patients. A new method was introduced to quantify hypotensive exposures in form of a novel risk score called the SLUScore™, a score with values from ranging from 0 (no hypotensive exposure) to a maximum of 31 (the maximal number of exposures exceeded of a certain risk-based set of limits for time accumulated at a mean arterial blood pressure below thresholds between 75 and 45 mm Hg), with each increment of the SLUScore™ portending an equivalent 5% increase in 30-day postoperative mortality.

Hypothesis:

We test the hypothesis that alerting the anaesthesia care team to progressive hypotensive exposures (a progressive increase in their SLUScore™) improves 30-day survival. This will be tested in a prospective, randomised trial.

Methods and Design:

A novel Clinical Decision Support System (ACG-Anesthesia by Talis Clinical, LLC) will be used to alert anaesthesia care team members to patients' SLUScores™ in near real time (within 1 minute of documented exposures). At the time of transition from a SLUScore™ of 0 to 1 (occurring in approximately every third anaesthetic), patients will be automatically randomized by the ACG-Anesthesia system to either alert or no alert (blinded) status with the intent of raising awareness on the part of the anaesthesia care team in the alert group of the occurrence of extended hypotensive exposures and their associated risk, allowing the team to render its best clinical judgment to initiate interventions aimed at bringing patients out of progressive hypotensive states. With one interim analysis planned after two years, a total of 56,248 patients are projected to be enrolled over a 4-year period for this trial to be powered to detect a 0.3% absolute reduction in 30-day mortality, by saving at least 50 lives in the alert group after two years (two-sided p\<0.016) or at least 70 lives (two-sided p\<0.019) at the conclusion of the trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Hypotension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Electronic alert to SLUScore increase

Patients whose anesthesia care team members are receiving alerts to increments in their SLUScore (progressive hypotensive exposures) are anticipated to be given interventions aimed at minimizing further hypotensive exposures. The decision of whether or not to intervene as well as the type(s) of interventions will be at the sole discretion of the patient's anesthesia care team

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electronic alert to SLUScore increase

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Treat hypotension to minimize further progression of the SLUScore

Control (no alert)

Routine anesthesia care at the discretion of the anesthesia care team

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electronic alert to SLUScore increase

Treat hypotension to minimize further progression of the SLUScore

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Treat hypotension

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any adult patient presenting for any type of non-cardiac procedure performed under any type of anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Pediatric patients (\< 18 yrs of age)
* Obstetric patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Louis University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wolf H. Stapelfeldt, MD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wolf H. Stapelfeldt, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Saint Louis University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saint Louis University Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.thelancet.com/protocol-reviews-list

Link to the full protocol on The Lancet's web site

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB # 24886

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pre-op Fluid Study
NCT05079269 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Phenylephrine and Pulse Pressure Variability
NCT05011357 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Vasopressor Outcomes in Spine Surgery
NCT06053398 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1