Pain Relief After Colorectal Surgery: Spinal Combined With Painbuster® vs Painbuster® Alone.

NCT ID: NCT02210260

Last Updated: 2016-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

79 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Limiting surgical stress and managing postoperative pain are well understood to influence recovery and outcome from major surgery for colorectal cancer and both are fundamental aspects of enhanced recovery protocols.

Traditional approaches for dealing with these problems such as epidural or patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia are associated with problems that may be detrimental to postoperative recovery and surgical outcome. As a result there is evidence in the literature of increasing interest in alternative techniques such as intrathecal anaesthesia or continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic, however nobody has examined the effect of combining the techniques or their impact on the surgical stress response.

We intend to compare patients undergoing major resections for colorectal cancer receiving intrathecal anaesthesia in combination with a wound infusion of local anaesthetic with those receiving a continuous wound infusion alone. We will examine the surgical stress response and postoperative pain control in addition to objective measures of postoperative recovery.

We suggest that our approach will attenuate the surgical stress response and provide optimal pain control that will ultimately translate in improved recovery and outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a pilot randomised controlled trial

Hypotheses -

Following colorectal surgery, spinal anaesthesia combined with a continuous infusion of local anaesthetic into the surgical wound provides

1. better pain relief
2. a reduced stress response

when compared to the use of continuous infusion of local anaesthetic into the surgical wound alone.

Patients undergoing surgical resection for colorectal cancer will be randomised to receive either

1. A single shot of spinal anaesthesia plus a continuous infusion of local anaesthetic into the surgical wound or
2. Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic into the surgical wound

Spinal Anaesthesia

The spinal anaesthetic (SA) with be placed after commencement of general anaesthesia this will ensure the patients remain blinded to the intervention. SA will be performed in the lateral position using a midline approach. L3/4 interspace will be identified using Tuffier's as the anatomical landmark. After confirmation of correct placement using a 25G Whitacre needle, 12.5 mg of hyperbaric Bupivacaine in a mixture with 500mcg Diamorphine will be injected intrathecally.

Infusion of local anaesthetic

The catheter through which the infusion of local anaesthetic will be given, will be placed by the surgeon at the end of the procedure in a location determined by the surgical approach. A bolus dose of 20ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine will be injected down the catheters prior to the connection of the elastomeric pump which will also contain 270ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine

General anaesthesia will be managed in the same way for both groups

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic

Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic into the surgical wound

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A Painbuster® catheter will be placed by the surgeon at the end of the procedure in a location determined by the surgical approach. A bolus dose of 20ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine will be injected down the catheters prior to the connection of the elastomeric pump which will also contain 270ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine.

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

A Painbuster® catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Spinal and infusion of local anaesthetic

A one off spinal anaesthetic plus a continuous infusion of local anaesthetic into the surgical wound

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal and infusion of local anaesthetic

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal anaesthetic will be performed in the lateral position using a midline approach. L3/4 interspace will be identified using Tuffier's as the anatomical landmark. After confirmation of correct placement using a 25G Whitacre needle, 12.5 mg of hyperbaric Bupivacaine in a mixture with 500mcg Diamorphine will be injected intrathecally.

PLUS

Painbuster® catheters will be placed by the surgeon at the end of the procedure in a location determined by the surgical approach. A bolus dose of 20ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine will be injected down the catheters prior to the connection of the elastomeric pump which will also contain 270ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine.

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Diamorphine

Intervention Type DRUG

500mcg

A Painbuster® catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

25G Whitacre needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal and infusion of local anaesthetic

Spinal anaesthetic will be performed in the lateral position using a midline approach. L3/4 interspace will be identified using Tuffier's as the anatomical landmark. After confirmation of correct placement using a 25G Whitacre needle, 12.5 mg of hyperbaric Bupivacaine in a mixture with 500mcg Diamorphine will be injected intrathecally.

PLUS

Painbuster® catheters will be placed by the surgeon at the end of the procedure in a location determined by the surgical approach. A bolus dose of 20ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine will be injected down the catheters prior to the connection of the elastomeric pump which will also contain 270ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic

A Painbuster® catheter will be placed by the surgeon at the end of the procedure in a location determined by the surgical approach. A bolus dose of 20ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine will be injected down the catheters prior to the connection of the elastomeric pump which will also contain 270ml 0.25% L-Bupivacaine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Diamorphine

500mcg

Intervention Type DRUG

A Painbuster® catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

25G Whitacre needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients who are undergoing either laparoscopic or open colorectal resections will be considered eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under 18 years of age.
* Pregnant females.
* Patients undergoing an abdominoperineal resection.
* Patients who will not contemplate being randomized to receive a spinal anaesthetic.
* Patients with a history of failure to place an epidural / spinal anaesthetic.
* Hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics.
* Lack of capacity to give consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel Harper, MBChB, FRCA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Scarborough General Hospital

Scarborough, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNE 2190

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Speeding Recovery From Pain and Opioid Use
NCT03388814 WITHDRAWN EARLY_PHASE1
Ketamine in Colorectal Surgery
NCT02785003 WITHDRAWN PHASE4
Multimodal Analgesia Effect on Post Surgical Patient
NCT04240626 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4