Compare Preperitoneal Analgesia to Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control After Colon and Rectal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01552226

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective randomized study of 114 patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two standard methods of analgesia for pain control in patients undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery, as measured by the Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) and by the need for supplemental narcotic analgesics. This study is designed to determine if postoperative pain control by local analgesics delivered through preperitoneally placed ON-Q Silver Soakerâ„¢ catheters (CPA) is equivalent to continuous epidural analgesia (CEA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Perioperative analgesia is a vital part of the management of patients undergoing colon and rectal surgery, affecting well being and length of hospital stay. Neuraxial anesthetics infused through epidural or spinal catheters have become commonplace pain management agents for patients. These techniques, however, are labor-intensive and expensive. Alternatively, local analgesics may be administered directly to the surgical wound via silver catheters.

Aim Two standard methods of analgesia for pain control for colon and rectal surgery will be evaluated systematically to determine if these two approaches are equivalent in terms of patient pain scores and supplemental narcotic use.

Study Design This is a prospective randomized study of 114 participants undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery at an independent academic medical center. The primary outcomes are post-operative pain control and supplemental narcotic usage.

Other variables of interest

* Surgical site infections
* The post-operative time to return of bowel function
* The hospital expenses/cost differences
* Quality of life measured with the Short Form (SF)- 36 questionnaire

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Cancer Rectal Cancer Colonic Diverticulosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia (CPA)

Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia for pain management

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia

Intervention Type DEVICE

Preperitoneal catheter placed at the completion of surgery in the standard fashion.

Continuous Epidural Analgesia (CEA)

Continuous Epidural Analgesia for pain management

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuous Epidural Analgesia

Intervention Type DEVICE

Epidural catheter placed prior to the operation in the standard fashion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia

Preperitoneal catheter placed at the completion of surgery in the standard fashion.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Continuous Epidural Analgesia

Epidural catheter placed prior to the operation in the standard fashion.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

On-Q Silver Soaker(tm)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> = 18 years
* Scheduled for elective colon or rectal surgery
* Surgical procedure either through open laparotomy or via minimal invasive approach (laparoscopic)
* Able to provide informed consent
* Able to complete patient questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented allergic reaction to morphine, hydromorphone, lidocaine, bupivicaine and/or fentanyl
* Contra-indication to placement of epidural catheter (spinal stenosis, spinal fusion, etc)
* Urgent surgery precluding epidural catheter placement
* Systemic Infection contraindicating epidural catheter placement
* Unwillingness to participate in follow up assessments
* Prisoners
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Trinity Health Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Cleary, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Trinity Health Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.fascrs.org

American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RCNM 114

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.