Compare Preperitoneal Analgesia to Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control After Colon and Rectal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT01552226
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
98 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial Comparing Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Pain Management in Colorectal Surgery
NCT02591407
Intrathecal Morphine Analgesia vs. Continuous Epidural Analgesia vs. Systemic Analgesia in Colorectal Surgery.
NCT03007121
Comparison of Patient Controlled & Continuous Epidural Analgesia in Thoraco-abdominal Surgeries in Cancer Patients
NCT02803385
Epidural Analgesia or Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Gynecologic Cancer
NCT00295945
Neuraxial and Neurolytic Analgesia for Intractable Pain
NCT00167726
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim Two standard methods of analgesia for pain control for colon and rectal surgery will be evaluated systematically to determine if these two approaches are equivalent in terms of patient pain scores and supplemental narcotic use.
Study Design This is a prospective randomized study of 114 participants undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery at an independent academic medical center. The primary outcomes are post-operative pain control and supplemental narcotic usage.
Other variables of interest
* Surgical site infections
* The post-operative time to return of bowel function
* The hospital expenses/cost differences
* Quality of life measured with the Short Form (SF)- 36 questionnaire
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia (CPA)
Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia for pain management
Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia
Preperitoneal catheter placed at the completion of surgery in the standard fashion.
Continuous Epidural Analgesia (CEA)
Continuous Epidural Analgesia for pain management
Continuous Epidural Analgesia
Epidural catheter placed prior to the operation in the standard fashion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia
Preperitoneal catheter placed at the completion of surgery in the standard fashion.
Continuous Epidural Analgesia
Epidural catheter placed prior to the operation in the standard fashion.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for elective colon or rectal surgery
* Surgical procedure either through open laparotomy or via minimal invasive approach (laparoscopic)
* Able to provide informed consent
* Able to complete patient questionnaire
Exclusion Criteria
* Contra-indication to placement of epidural catheter (spinal stenosis, spinal fusion, etc)
* Urgent surgery precluding epidural catheter placement
* Systemic Infection contraindicating epidural catheter placement
* Unwillingness to participate in follow up assessments
* Prisoners
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Trinity Health Michigan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Cleary, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Trinity Health Michigan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RCNM 114
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.