Randomized Experiment of Playworks

NCT ID: NCT02192281

Last Updated: 2014-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2278 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Playworks has an impact on student and school outcomes such as physical activity, behavior, and academic performance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Playworks is a school-based program that places full-time coaches in low-income schools to organize games and activities during recess. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) contracted with Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractor, the John W. Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities (JGC) at Stanford University, to conduct a rigorous evaluation of Playworks. Twenty-nine schools interested in implementing Playworks, across six cities in the United States, were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups during the 2010-2011 (cohort 1) or 2011-2012 (cohort 2) school year. Random assignment was conducted within matched groups of schools within each city. In total, there were 12 blocks of matched schools. For each block, one school was randomly assigned to the control group and the rest to the treatment group.

During the one-year study period for each cohort, treatment schools received Playworks and control schools were not eligible to implement Playworks. Data from student surveys, accelerometers, and teacher surveys were collected from 4th- and 5th-grade students, teachers, and school staff roughly seven months after Playworks was first implemented in treatment schools.

For the student survey, students were asked to complete a 30-minute student survey in the spring of their study year about their experiences at school. A team of experienced survey administration staff administered the survey in the students' classrooms. In addition to the student survey, teachers were asked to complete a teacher survey that asked teachers about their students' experiences at school.

A subsample of students that were asked to complete the student survey also wore accelerometers during one or two school days. During the accelerometer data collection period, the research team arrived at participating classrooms at the beginning of the school day. Team members described the function of the accelerometer and then attached one to each consented student's hip, using an elastic belt. The accelerometer data was then processed with the ActiLife 5 software package.

The impact of Playworks on study outcomes was estimated by comparing the average outcomes in treatment and control schools using regression models customized to the unit of analysis (teacher or student). The regression models used for analysis included indicators for random assignment blocks to account for the blocked design and school-specific random error terms to account for school-specific effects not attributable to the treatment. Covariates were also included in some models to account for significant differences between treatment and control groups in demographic characteristics. Models for continuous and binary outcome variables were fit using least-squares estimation and logistic regression estimation, respectively. Standard errors for the estimated impacts on teacher- and student-level outcomes accounted for clustering at the school level using generalized estimating equations. Model-based p-values and effect sizes were calculated based on the estimated impacts and corresponding standard errors and multiple comparison adjustments accounted for correlations among the multiple tests. Sampling weights were used when estimating impacts. The weights were constructed to account for both the selection probabilities of students and teachers into the sample and nonresponse.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Focus on Physical Activity, Recess, and Play

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Playworks

Playworks was implemented during the entire school year, and outcome measures were collected in spring of the school year.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Playworks

Intervention Type OTHER

The Playworks program places full-time coaches in low-income schools to provide opportunities for organized play during recess and throughout the school day.

Control

Playworks was not implemented at these schools.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Playworks

The Playworks program places full-time coaches in low-income schools to provide opportunities for organized play during recess and throughout the school day.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Students in low-income schools in urban areas
* Students in schools where at least 50 percent of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susanne James-Burdumy

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mathematica Policy Research

Martha Bleeker

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mathematica Policy Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mathematica Policy Research

Princeton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12-177

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MPR-06758

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Classroom Activities
NCT03394846 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
The PACO RCT Study
NCT03937336 COMPLETED NA
Stanford Preschool Physical Activity Project
NCT00285792 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Promoting Pupils' Physical Literacy
NCT05822024 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA