Ridge Preservation With New Class of Osteoplastic Materials
NCT ID: NCT02155764
Last Updated: 2019-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-01
2019-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project aims at addressing the preservation of bone volume in humans after tooth extraction using biomaterials with optimum performance. The practical significance of the project is to establish an effective tissue response and, thus, possible subsequent quality installation of dental implants. The proposed solution is based on the scientific development of the operative techniques, and a comparative analysis of several classes of biomaterials (xenogenic and synthetic analogs), including the use of biological precursors of bone apatite mineralization having osteoinductive (stimulating) properties.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biomaterial to Counteract Ridge Reduction Following the Removal of Multiple Adjacent Teeth.
NCT02903667
Ridge Preservation Using a Ossix™ Bone vs Bio-Oss® Collagen
NCT04338516
Using Combination of Synthetic Bone Substitutes During Extractions
NCT01503593
Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05572242
Evaluation of Bone Changes After Immediate Implant Placement or Socket Preservation With or Without Surgical Flap in The Aesthetic Zone
NCT03690973
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Octacalcium phosphate
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Octacalcium phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Octacalcium phosphate
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Octacalcium Phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Bio-Oss
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Bio-Oss (bovine-derived xenograft)in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide
Bio-Oss
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Bio-Oss (bovine-derived xenograft)in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide
Tricalcium phosphate
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Tricalcium phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Tricalcium phosphate
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Tricalcium Phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Octacalcium phosphate
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Octacalcium Phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Bio-Oss
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Bio-Oss (bovine-derived xenograft)in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide
Tricalcium phosphate
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Tricalcium Phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Males and females, 18 years to 75 years of age
* Patient needs single tooth extraction in mandibular or maxillary incisor or pre-molar region and would benefit from prosthetic reconstruction with a dental implant
* Patients must be committed to the study and must sign informed consent
* Patient in good general health as documented by self assessment
Exclusion Criteria
* Female patient who are pregnant or lactating or of child bearing potential not using acceptable methods of birth control (hormonal, barriers or abstinence
* Patient who are on chronic treatment (i.e., two weeks or more) with any medication known to affect oral status (e.g., phenytoin, dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, cyclosporine, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) within one month of baseline visit
* Patient who knowingly has HIV or Hepatitis
* Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse causing systemic compromisation
* Patient who is a heavy smoker (\>10/cigarettes per day).
* Uncontrolled or untreated periodontal disease
* Patient who has a full mouth plaque level \>30 % at the enrolment visit
* History of local radiation therapy
* Presence of oral lesions (such as ulceration, malignancy)
* Persistent intraoral infection
* Patients presenting clinical and radiological signs and symptoms of maxillary sinus disease
* Patient presents an acute endodontic lesion in the test tooth or in the neighbouring areas to the experimental procedure (sites with presence of an asymptomatic chronic lesion are eligible)
17 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Central Scientific Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillo-facial Surgery, Moscow, Russia
UNKNOWN
Bionova, Skolkovo Community, Russia
UNKNOWN
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alex Gurin
Teaching Assistant, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anatoly Kulakov, Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Central Scientific Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillo-facial Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cental Scientific Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillo-facial Surgery
Moscow, RU, Russia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gurin AN, Komlev VS, Fadeeva IV, Petrakiva NV, Varda NS. [A comparative study of bone regeneration potency of alfa and beta-tricalcium phosphate bone substitute materials]. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2012;91(6):16-21. Russian.
Gurin AN, Komlev VS, Fadeeva IV, Barinov SM. [Calcium phosphate bone cements. Application in oral and maxillofacial surgery]. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2011;90(5):64-72. No abstract available. Russian.
Gurin AN, Komlev VS, Fadeeva IV, Barinov SM. [Octacalcium phosphate--precursor of biomineralization, novel bone scaffold]. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2010;89(4):57-64. Russian.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11-13
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
11-13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.