Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
990 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Testing ALERT With GTO in Middle Schools
NCT05219422
A Community-Based Strategy for Preventing Underage Drinking
NCT02448134
Brief Voluntary Alcohol and Drug Intervention for Middle School Youth
NCT01081119
Brief Youth Substance Use Intervention for Primary Care
NCT00292240
Prevention of Substance Use in At-Risk Students: A Family-Centered Web Program
NCT03060291
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Project CHOICE + Getting To Outcomes
Boys and Girls Club sites will receive a) training and materials for Project CHOICE and b) training, ongoing technical assistance for two years, and materials for Getting To Outcomes
Getting To Outcomes
These sites will receive written materials, training, and on site technical assistance to use the Getting To Outcomes process to implement Project CHOICE at their sites.
Project CHOICE
Sites will receive standard training for Project CHOICE.
Project CHOICE only
Boys and Girls Club sites will receive a) training and materials for Project CHOICE
Project CHOICE
Sites will receive standard training for Project CHOICE.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Getting To Outcomes
These sites will receive written materials, training, and on site technical assistance to use the Getting To Outcomes process to implement Project CHOICE at their sites.
Project CHOICE
Sites will receive standard training for Project CHOICE.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
10 Years
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
RAND
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew Chinman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
RAND
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BGC of Buena Park
Buena Park, California, United States
BGC of Burbank and Greater E Valley
Burbank, California, United States
BGC of Carson
Carson, California, United States
BGC of South Bay
Harbor City, California, United States
BGC of East LA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Challengers Boys and Girls Club
Los Angeles, California, United States
Salesian BGC
Los Angeles, California, United States
BGC of Santa Monica
Los Angeles, California, United States
BGC of West Valley
Los Angeles, California, United States
East Valley Boys and Girls Club
Los Angeles, California, United States
BGC of Santa Ana
Los Angeles, California, United States
BGC of LA Harbor
San Pedro, California, United States
BGC Stanton
Stanton, California, United States
BGC of Westminster
Westminster, California, United States
BGC of Whittier
Whittier, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Acosta J, Chinman M, Ebener PA, Malone PS, Cannon JS, D'Amico EJ. Sustaining an Evidence-Based Program Over Time: Moderators of Sustainability and the Role of the Getting to Outcomes(R) Implementation Support Intervention. Prev Sci. 2020 Aug;21(6):807-819. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01118-2.
Herman PM, Chinman M, Cannon J, Ebener P, Malone PS, Acosta J, D'Amico EJ. Cost Analysis of a Randomized Trial of Getting to Outcomes Implementation Support of CHOICE in Boys and Girls Clubs in Southern California. Prev Sci. 2020 Feb;21(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01082-6.
Cannon JS, Gilbert M, Ebener P, Malone PS, Reardon CM, Acosta J, Chinman M. Influence of an Implementation Support Intervention on Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of a Substance Use Prevention Program. Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1200-1210. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01037-x.
Chinman M, Ebener P, Malone PS, Cannon J, D'Amico EJ, Acosta J. Testing implementation support for evidence-based programs in community settings: a replication cluster-randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes(R). Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0825-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.