Preparing to Run Effective Prevention

NCT ID: NCT02135991

Last Updated: 2018-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

990 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Young people can engage in a variety of negative behaviors-such as drug use, underage drinking, and premarital sex-that exact a high toll on local communities. These activities are often the target of community-based prevention efforts. Getting To Outcomes (GTO) is an approach that includes a toolkit, technical assistance, and training, organized around a 10-step process, that helps communities plan, implement, and evaluate the impact of their programs that attempt to prevent these negative behaviors. This study will examine the degree to which Getting To Outcomes helps Boys and Girls Clubs implement an evidence based drug prevention program.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As a nation, the U.S. invests heavily in community-based organizations to conduct interventions, proven through research, to reduce the high rates of alcohol and drug use among teens. Much less is invested in helping communities implement these programs with quality. Although many evidence-based programs exist to address alcohol and drug use, communities face difficulty implementing them and achieving the same outcomes as researchers. This "gap" is because resources are limited, prevention is complex, and communities often lack the capacity-or the knowledge, attitudes, and skills-needed to implement "off the shelf" programs well. Common ways to bridge this gap, such as information dissemination, fail to change practice or outcomes at the local level in part because it does not sufficiently address capacity of community practitioners. Therefore, building a community's capacity is a method that could improve the quality of implementation and outcomes. Getting To Outcomes (GTO) is an implementation support intervention shown to improve the capacity of practitioners to conduct evidence-based programs, but its impact on fidelity and youth outcomes has not been studied. The study-Preparing to Run Effective Prevention (PREP)-will be a cluster randomized controlled trial using primary data from middle school youth (990) and program staff from 33 cooperating Boys and Girls Clubs sites (Sites) to assess how GTO impacts the fidelity, outcomes, and costs of an evidence-based program to prevent alcohol and drug use (Project CHOICE, PC). All 33 sites will receive training in PC. 16 Sites will conduct PC in a way typical of community-based organizations (PC only); 17 Sites will conduct PC augmented by GTO, comprised of training, onsite technical assistance, and a written GTO manual. The study will: (1) Assess the use of GTO and compare Sites' capacity between PC+GTO and PC only; (2) Compare PC fidelity between PC+GTO and PC only groups; (3) Compare alcohol and marijuana outcomes of middle-school youth in the PC+GTO (n=510) and PC only (n=480) groups; and (4) Assess the cost-effectiveness of GTO' impact. To address these aims we will collect data on the delivery and utilization of GTO (e.g., method of delivery, duration, topics); staff capacity to implement research-based interventions; observations of program delivery (fidelity monitoring); youth participants' use of, and attitudes towards, alcohol and marijuana via a survey at baseline and 3 and 6 months follow-up; and costs of both PC alone and PC+GTO. Analyses will examine differences between intervention (PC+GTO) and control (PC only) Sites' capacity, PC fidelity, outcomes, and costs over time, accounting for clustering within site. The PREP study could expand implementation research and serve as a model for how the government and other agencies support strong implementation of evidence-based programs in a wide array of domains. These outcomes are important to providing opportunities for youth to become healthy and productive adults.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implementation of Evidence Based Programs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Project CHOICE + Getting To Outcomes

Boys and Girls Club sites will receive a) training and materials for Project CHOICE and b) training, ongoing technical assistance for two years, and materials for Getting To Outcomes

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Getting To Outcomes

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

These sites will receive written materials, training, and on site technical assistance to use the Getting To Outcomes process to implement Project CHOICE at their sites.

Project CHOICE

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sites will receive standard training for Project CHOICE.

Project CHOICE only

Boys and Girls Club sites will receive a) training and materials for Project CHOICE

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Project CHOICE

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sites will receive standard training for Project CHOICE.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Getting To Outcomes

These sites will receive written materials, training, and on site technical assistance to use the Getting To Outcomes process to implement Project CHOICE at their sites.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Project CHOICE

Sites will receive standard training for Project CHOICE.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Age 10-14 and attends a participating boys and girls club

Exclusion Criteria

Younger than 10, older than 14, does not attend a participating boys and girls club
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

RAND

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew Chinman, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

RAND

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

BGC of Buena Park

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of Burbank and Greater E Valley

Burbank, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of Carson

Carson, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of South Bay

Harbor City, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of East LA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Challengers Boys and Girls Club

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Salesian BGC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of Santa Monica

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of West Valley

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

East Valley Boys and Girls Club

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of Santa Ana

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of LA Harbor

San Pedro, California, United States

Site Status

BGC Stanton

Stanton, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of Westminster

Westminster, California, United States

Site Status

BGC of Whittier

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Acosta J, Chinman M, Ebener PA, Malone PS, Cannon JS, D'Amico EJ. Sustaining an Evidence-Based Program Over Time: Moderators of Sustainability and the Role of the Getting to Outcomes(R) Implementation Support Intervention. Prev Sci. 2020 Aug;21(6):807-819. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01118-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32323166 (View on PubMed)

Herman PM, Chinman M, Cannon J, Ebener P, Malone PS, Acosta J, D'Amico EJ. Cost Analysis of a Randomized Trial of Getting to Outcomes Implementation Support of CHOICE in Boys and Girls Clubs in Southern California. Prev Sci. 2020 Feb;21(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01082-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31865544 (View on PubMed)

Cannon JS, Gilbert M, Ebener P, Malone PS, Reardon CM, Acosta J, Chinman M. Influence of an Implementation Support Intervention on Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of a Substance Use Prevention Program. Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1200-1210. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01037-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31473932 (View on PubMed)

Chinman M, Ebener P, Malone PS, Cannon J, D'Amico EJ, Acosta J. Testing implementation support for evidence-based programs in community settings: a replication cluster-randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes(R). Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0825-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30348227 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01AA022353

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Teen Success Project
NCT03015805 COMPLETED NA