A Family Intervention for Adolescent Problem Behavior (AKA Project Alliance 2)
NCT ID: NCT01490307
Last Updated: 2011-12-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
593 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-02-28
2011-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants include 593 youth and their families recruited from the 6th grade in three public middle schools in Portland, OR. Families were randomly assigned to receive either the FCU intervention model or treatment as usual. Assessments were collected for 5 years through the 10th grade. High school transition planning and intensive intervention efforts occurred in Grades 7-9.
The investigators tested the hypothesis that the FCU intervention will reduce the growth of problem behavior and substance use through the enhancement of family management and parent involvement in school.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Establish a Family Resource Center (FRC) that builds on school-wide behavior management;
2. Extend the intervention model to explicitly address the high school transition;
3. Develop intervention components specifically focused on the cultural enhancement with a broader youth population, and test the efficacy of these interventions for reducing risk and enhancing positive adjustment for youth and their families;
4. Evaluate the preventive impact of family engagement on individual differences in the growth of deviant peer involvement, antisocial behavior, and tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use during the critical transition to high school; and
5. Develop a training and fidelity model related to change.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FCU offered
Family Check-Up
The Family Check-Up starts with a rapport-building session that allows therapists to gauge parents' concerns and motivation for change. This is followed by a thorough assessment of individual family strengths and weaknesses, utilizing parent and child questionnaires and family video observations. Parents then receive feedback on the results of the assessment using motivational interviewing techniques. Attention is focused on parents' and children's readiness to change, as well as the delineation of specific change options. Families may continued to receive tailored intervention services using the Everyday Parenting Curriculum.
No feedback or services offered
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Family Check-Up
The Family Check-Up starts with a rapport-building session that allows therapists to gauge parents' concerns and motivation for change. This is followed by a thorough assessment of individual family strengths and weaknesses, utilizing parent and child questionnaires and family video observations. Parents then receive feedback on the results of the assessment using motivational interviewing techniques. Attention is focused on parents' and children's readiness to change, as well as the delineation of specific change options. Families may continued to receive tailored intervention services using the Everyday Parenting Curriculum.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
University of Oregon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elizabeth A Stormshak, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oregon
Thomas J Dishion, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oregon
Kathryn A Kavanagh, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oregon
Allison S Caruthers, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Oregon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Oregon-Child and Family Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.