Adolescent Screening and Personalized Intervention Resource for Enhancement of Behavioral Health and Substance Use
NCT ID: NCT06306287
Last Updated: 2024-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-15
2025-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Are substance use and co-occurring problem outcomes for ePACE and eFACE are superior to those for a waitlist comparison group (WC)
* Are outcomes for ePACE are superior to those for eFACE
* Are the direct effects of ePACE and eFACE (i.e., the improvements in substance use and co-occurring problem outcomes) associated with improvements in areas of functioning and new skills that are hypothesized to produce change -- that is, are the improvements shown in the ePACE and eFACE groups due to the mechanisms by which change is hypothesized to occur Participants in ePACE and eFACE will complete a baseline assessment prior to engaging in the intervention to which they are assigned and will complete post-intervention assessments 3 months and 6 months later. Participants in the WC group will complete three assessments: at baseline, 3-months, and 6-months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Screening and Peer Interventions to Prevent Substance Use in At-Risk Adolescents
NCT07074860
Linking Individuals Needing Care for Substance Use Disorders to Peer Coaches
NCT05847621
Peer MI for Substance-using Emerging Adults
NCT03264872
Screening to Augment Referral to Treatment- Project START
NCT01539525
Innovating Technology Solutions for Residents in Support Housing Communities w SUD Through Community-Engaged Research
NCT07001020
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Evaluate the impact of ePACE and a "fixed" non-personalized intervention, eHealth Fixed Approach for Change Efficacy (eFACE), for youth with co-occurring problems, relative to a waiting list comparison (WC) group on substance use and related problem outcomes. We expect better outcomes for both ePACE and eFACE vs WC over the 6-month follow-up and expect that ePACE vs WC
* effects will be larger than eFACE vs WC effects.
* Evaluate the direct effects of ePACE and eFACE on targeted areas of functioning and skill development hypothesized to produce change in substance use and co-occurring problems. Youth assigned to ePACE and eFACE are expected to exhibit greater improvements compared to those assigned to WC, with the effects of ePACE larger than those of eFACE.
* Examine factors associated with successful implementation of ePACE, including participant ratings of usability, acceptability, and satisfaction.
The proposed brief, personalized, youth-centered, early intervention approach, web and smart-phone friendly, offers a promising solution for youth service providers to address the underserved needs of youth, potentially mitigating the need for more intensive, costly interventions later and potentially accommodating a youth-serving system that often lacks accessible and affordable behavior health services.
Youth will be recruited to participate in the trial through community organizations such as juvenile justice, schools, and organizations serving parents and adolescents. Participating youth will be randomly assigned to one of three groups (N=40 per group): ePACE, eFACE or WC. Both ePACE and eFACE address substance use and co-occurring problems. However, ePACE is a personalized, youth-centered approach that allows youth a choice of modules they receive, ranging from two to four, the order in which modules are selected, and the feedback they receive from interactive components of the program, depending on youth responses to activities and exercises, whereas ePACE involves a "fixed", non-tailored set of modules that all youth in this condition receive in the same set order with no tailored feedback based on their responses to activities and exercises. The trial design will allow us to examine if ePACE and eFACE outcomes are both superior to WC but ePACE is NOT superior eFACE. Such a finding would suggest that the less complex, fixed, four-module version of the intervention is adequate for scaling and broad implementation efforts. eFACE is arguably lower cost to develop and easier to scale and maintain than ePACE. Thus, finding such support for eFACE (versus WC) could have important implications for dissemination of the program.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ePACE Experimental Condition
The experimental intervention to be administered, ePACE, is a web-based brief intervention that includes personalization and youth-centered features. Feedback is provided based on youth's responses to activities, exercises, and quizzes to guide each individual's behavior change efforts.
ePACE Personalized Intervention
The ePACE intervention is based on culturally and developmentally relevant youth treatments organized around an integrative approach based on Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) and Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) to enhance motivation for change, support awareness of thoughts, emotions, and behavior, and address specific behavior change goals. The web-based approach is personalized, with youth-driven choices in terms of intensity, content, and sequencing of content and provide tailored feedback to youth regarding each individual's behavior change efforts. Modules address substance use, negative moods, decision-making, and interpersonal relations and require approximately 40-minutes to complete. Interactive activities, exercises, and quizzes are designed to promote skill acquisition. Each module involves an introduction and engagement strategies, several exercises and activities related to the problem area, goal setting, and a summary.
eFACE Active Comparator Condition
The eFACE active comparator arm involves the eFACE intervention and includes content that is similar to the ePACE experimental intervention, but modules are offered in a fixed order with no tailoring features. No personalized feedback based on youth responses are provided to inform individual youth's behavior change efforts.
eFACE Fixed Intervention
The eFACE intervention includes content that is similar to ePACE, but modules are offered in a fixed order with no tailoring features. Like ePACE, modules address substance use, negative moods, decision-making, and interpersonal relations and require approximately 40-minutes to complete. Each module involves an introduction and engagement strategies, several exercises and activities related to the problem area, goal setting, and a summary. However, no personalized feedback based on youth responses are provided to inform individual youth's behavior change efforts.
Waiting List Comparison Group
Youth in the waitlist comparison (WC) condition will not have access to the ePACE or eFACE modules until the final (6-month) assessment has been completed. Thus, the WC group will serve as a "no intervention" comparison group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ePACE Personalized Intervention
The ePACE intervention is based on culturally and developmentally relevant youth treatments organized around an integrative approach based on Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) and Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) to enhance motivation for change, support awareness of thoughts, emotions, and behavior, and address specific behavior change goals. The web-based approach is personalized, with youth-driven choices in terms of intensity, content, and sequencing of content and provide tailored feedback to youth regarding each individual's behavior change efforts. Modules address substance use, negative moods, decision-making, and interpersonal relations and require approximately 40-minutes to complete. Interactive activities, exercises, and quizzes are designed to promote skill acquisition. Each module involves an introduction and engagement strategies, several exercises and activities related to the problem area, goal setting, and a summary.
eFACE Fixed Intervention
The eFACE intervention includes content that is similar to ePACE, but modules are offered in a fixed order with no tailoring features. Like ePACE, modules address substance use, negative moods, decision-making, and interpersonal relations and require approximately 40-minutes to complete. Each module involves an introduction and engagement strategies, several exercises and activities related to the problem area, goal setting, and a summary. However, no personalized feedback based on youth responses are provided to inform individual youth's behavior change efforts.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* live at home with at least one parent or parent figure
* reporting mild/moderate substance use
* reporting mental health issues
* sufficient English language skills for assessments and intervention
• sufficient English language skills for assessments and intervention
Exclusion Criteria
* evidence of psychotic or organic state
* high problem severity indicating possible need for higher level of care
• another parent or parent figure is already participating in the study
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oregon Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oregon Research Institute
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DA053660
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.