The Effect of Medication Review in High-risk Emergency Department Patients
NCT ID: NCT02122965
Last Updated: 2014-04-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10805 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This prospective multi-centre, quasi-randomized study is nested within an existing quality improvement program. Triage nurses flag incoming emergency department patients at high-risk for adverse drug events by applying a clinical decision rule consisting of four variables (co-morbid conditions, antibiotic use within 7 days, medication changes within 28 days, and age). Consecutive eligible high-risk patients are enrolled into the medication review study, and systematically allocated to pharmacist-led medication review or usual care. In the intervention group, medication review pharmacists collect best-possible medication histories, review the patient's medications for appropriateness and adverse drug events, and communicate the results of medication review to patients, caregivers and physicians. In the usual care group, physicians refer patients to onsite pharmacists for medication management questions on an as needed basis. Health outcomes are assessed using anonymized data linkage to administrative health databases. The primary outcome is the percent of days spent in hospital during the first 30 days after the index emergency department visit
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of a Screening Strategy for Community-based Adverse Drug Related Events in the Emergency Department
NCT00727610
Improving Drug Safety in Emergency Patients -a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03123640
How Often Are Pharmacist Recommendations Followed by Emergency Physicians in Emergency Departments?
NCT01723462
Effect of Medication Reviews Performed in High Risk Patients
NCT01819974
Reducing Medication Errors on Basis of an Individual Risk Assessment
NCT01814280
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pharmacist-led medication review
Pharmacist-led medication review in the ED
Pharmacist-led medication review
Medication review is a structured, critical examination of a patient's medications with the objective of reaching agreement with the patient about treatment, optimizing the medications' impact, and minimizing the number of medication-related problems and adverse drug events.
Usual care
Usual care includes nurse-led medication reconciliation.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pharmacist-led medication review
Medication review is a structured, critical examination of a patient's medications with the objective of reaching agreement with the patient about treatment, optimizing the medications' impact, and minimizing the number of medication-related problems and adverse drug events.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Corinne M Hohl, MD, MHSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lions Gate Hospital
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Richmond Hospital
Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H11-01815
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.