Development of a Screening Strategy for Community-based Adverse Drug Related Events in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT00727610

Last Updated: 2011-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1588 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Adverse Drug Related Events (ADREs) are a leading cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits in Canada. However emergency physicians recognize only half of all ADREs in patients presenting to the ED, missing opportunities to intervene. The objective of this study is to develop a screening strategy that identifies patients with ADREs. Our hypothesis is that the development of a user-friendly, reliable screening strategy for ADREs in patients presenting to the ED is feasible. We believe that this will lead to improved patient care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Between 9250 and 23,750 Canadians die each year because of preventable adverse events related to medical care. ADREs account for 50% of all preventable adverse events and cause up to 12% of ED visits. Unfortunately, emergency physicians recognize only half of all ADREs, missing crucial opportunities to intervene.

Objective The objective of this study is to derive a clinical decision rule that accurately stratifies patients presenting to the ED into risk categories for drug-related morbidity. This instrument will allow early identification of clinically significant ADREs allowing rational referral for medication optimization, treatment of ADREs and prevention of future events.

Hypothesis The development of a rapid, user-friendly reliable clinical decision rule for ADREs in patients presenting to the ED is feasible.

Methodology This prospective observational study will evaluate predictor variables (from the history, physical examination and laboratory tests) for ADREs in a representative sample of ED patients using standardized assessments by emergency nurses and physicians. Inter-rater agreement of predictor variables will be measured, and clinical pharmacists, blinded to the nursing and physician assessments, will use a standardized, validated algorithm to identify ADREs. Recursive partitioning and/or logistic regression analysis will be used to determine the optimal combination of predictor variables to detect the presence of an ADRE. We will report diagnostic test characteristics of the derived clinical decision rule. Validation of the clinical decision rule is planned in a future study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adverse Drug Related Events

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults over the age of 19 years
* Reported having used at least one prescription or over-the-counter medication in the 2 weeks prior to presentation
* Speak English and/or translator available at the time of presentation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients previously enrolled
* Patients transferred directly to an admitting service.
* Patients who leave prior to being seen or against medical advice.
* Patients returning to the ED for a scheduled revisit.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Patient Safety Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vancouver Coastal Health

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of British Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of British Columbia

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Corinne M. Hohl

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of British Columbia

Jeffrey R. Brubacher

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of British Columbia

Samuel B. Sheps

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of British Columbia

Linda Dempster

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of British Columbia

Garth Hunt

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of British Columbia

Claude Stang

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of British Columbia

Janet Joy

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of British Columbia

Peter Loewen

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of British Columbia

Matthew Wiens

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of British Columbia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emergency Department, Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Emergency Department, St Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H08-00510

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.