52-Week Efficacy and Safety Study of Ibodutant in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)

NCT ID: NCT02120027

Last Updated: 2017-03-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

558 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterised by chronic or recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort and diarrhoea. This trial aims at the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of oral ibodutant 10 mg once daily as compared to placebo in women with IBS-D over a 24-week treatment period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ibodutant 10 mg, given once daily for 24 weeks in comparison with placebo in female IBS-D patients. Randomisation to ibodutant and placebo will be 1:1. Efficacy is evaluated in terms of weekly response for abdominal pain intensity and stool consistency over 24 weeks of treatment in at least 50% of the weeks of treatment.

The clinical phase of the study comprises up to 2 weeks of screening for patient's eligibility, a 2-week run-in period (treatment-free) for IBS severity assessment, a first 24-week double-blind treatment period, a second 28-week re-randomised double-blind treatment period and a 2-week safety follow-up, resulting in a maximum 58-week overall duration of the study for each patient.

Patients report their IBS-related symptoms daily in a telephone-based electronic diary from run-in until end of treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ibodutant 10 mg

Oral tablet to be given once daily for 24 weeks of treatment. Patients randomised to the ibodutant 10 mg arm will continue on ibodutant 10 mg for additional 28 weeks of treatment via mock-re-randomisation at week 25 .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ibodutant 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral tablet, to be given once daily.

Placebo

Oral tablet to be given once daily for 24 weeks of treatment. Patients randomised to the placebo arm will be re-randomised at week 25 in a 1:1 ratio to ibodutant or placebo for additional 28 weeks of treatment.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral tablet (identical in appearance and weight to ibodutant tablets) to be given once daily.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ibodutant 10 mg

Oral tablet, to be given once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Oral tablet (identical in appearance and weight to ibodutant tablets) to be given once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Code: MEN 15596 Sugar pill

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At screening:

* Female patients aged 18 years or older.
* Clinical diagnosis of IBS-D according to the following symptoms-based criteria as per Rome III modular questionnaire criteria:

1. Recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort for at least 3 days per month in the last 3 months associated with at least 2 of the following characteristics: a) improvement with defecation; b) onset associated with a change in the frequency of stool; c) onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool.
2. Symptom-onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis.
3. Loose or watery stools at least 25% of the time in the last 3 months AND hard or lumpy stools less than 25% of the time in the last 3 months.
4. Additional criterion: more than 3 bowel movements per day at least 25% of the time in the last 3 months.
* For patients older than 50 years OR patients with a positive family history of colorectal cancer: normal results from colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy performed within the last 5 years.
* For patients aged 65 years or older: absence of ischaemic colitis, microscopy colitis or any other organic gastrointestinal disease as evidenced by the results of a colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsy performed within 6 months.
* For women of childbearing potential: Use of a highly effective contraceptive method with a failure rate \<1% per year throughout the entire study period.
* Physical examination without clinically relevant abnormalities during screening.
* No clinically relevant abnormalities in 12-Lead ECG or in laboratory findings.
* Mentally competent, able to give written informed consent, and compliant to undergo all visits and procedures.
* Unrestricted access to a touch-tone telephone.
* Willingness to refrain from using loperamide within 3 days prior to run-in visit and during the run-in period.

Additional criteria at randomisation:

* During both weeks of the run-in period:

1. A weekly average of worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours with a score of ≥3.0 on a 0 to 10 point scale.
2. At least one bowel movement on each day.
3. A weekly average of at least 3 bowel movements per day.
4. At least one stool with a consistency of Type 6 or Type 7 according to the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) on at least 2 days per week.
5. Less than 2 bowel movements with a consistency of Type 1 or Type 2 according to the BSS per week.
6. Adequate compliance with the e-diary recording procedure defined as at least 11 of 14 days (≥75%) of the nominal daily data entry.

Exclusion Criteria

* Male gender.
* Diagnosis of IBS with a subtype of constipation, mixed IBS, or un-subtyped IBS.
* Colonic or major abdominal surgery, any other major abdominal surgery or elective major surgery planned or expected during the study.
* History of organic GI abnormalities, inflammatory bowel diseases, complicated diverticulosis, ischaemic colitis, microscopic colitis.
* History of pancreatitis, active biliary duct disease, cholecystitis or symptomatic gallbladder stone disease in the previous 6 months.
* History of gluten enteropathy or lactose intolerance.
* Current or previous diagnosis of neoplasia.
* History of endometriosis.
* History of positive tests for ova or parasites, or clostridium difficile toxin or occult blood in the stool in the previous 6 months.
* History of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
* History of major cardiovascular events in the previous 6 months.
* Uncontrolled hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or abnormal thyroid function.
* Major psychiatric or neurological disorders or unstable medical condition which may compromise the efficacy and safety assessments.
* Evidence of clinically significant hepatic disease, severe renal insufficiency or anemia.
* Relevant changes in dietary habits, lifestyle, or exercise regimen in the previous 2 months.
* Use of prohibited concurrent medication within the previous month such as antibiotics, antimuscarinic drugs, drugs enhancing GI motility and analgesics.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
* Inability to understand or collaborate throughout the study.
* Participation in other clinical studies in the previous 4 weeks or concurrent enrollment in a clinical study.
* Any condition that would compromise the well-being of the patient.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Menarini Group

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Tack, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Lin Chang, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Digestive Health and Nutrition Clinic. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Encino, California, United States

Site Status

Gold River, California, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, California, United States

Site Status

North Hollywood, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Centennial, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Inverness, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pinellas Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Addison, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Clive, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Shawnee, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Columbia, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Wyoming, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Newington, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kinston, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mentor, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Logan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Sandy City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Lynchburgh, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Kralove, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Příbram, , Czechia

Site Status

Slaný, , Czechia

Site Status

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Schwerin, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Mátészalka, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Vác, , Hungary

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga III, , Latvia

Site Status

Valmiera, , Latvia

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Sopot, , Poland

Site Status

Staszów, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Ilava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trnava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Bexhill-on-Sea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chorley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Coventry, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edgbaston, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Llanishen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Northumberland, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Waterloo, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Czechia Germany Hungary Latvia Poland Slovakia Sweden United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-000895-14

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NAK-07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.