12-Week Efficacy and Safety Study of Ibodutant in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)

NCT ID: NCT02107196

Last Updated: 2017-01-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

535 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterised by chronic or recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort and diarrhoea. This trial aims at the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of oral ibodutant 10 mg once daily as compared to placebo in women with IBS-D over a 12-week treatment period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ibodutant 10 mg, given once daily for 12 weeks in comparison with placebo in female IBS-D patients. Randomisation to ibodutant and placebo will be 1:1. Efficacy is evaluated in terms of weekly response for abdominal pain intensity and stool consistency over 12 weeks of treatment in at least 50% of the weeks of treatment.

The clinical phase of the study comprises up to 2 weeks of screening for patient's eligibility, a 2-week run-in period (treatment-free) for IBS severity assessment, a 12-week double-blind treatment period, a 4-week randomised withdrawal (RW) period and a 2-week safety follow-up, resulting in a maximum 22-week overall duration of the study for each patient.

Patients report their IBS-related symptoms daily in a telephone-based electronic diary from run-in until end of treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ibodutant 10 mg

Oral tablet to be given once daily for 12 weeks of treatment. Patients randomised to the ibodutant 10 mg arm will be re-randomised at week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to either ibodutant 10 mg or placebo for additional 4 weeks of treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ibodutant 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral tablet, to be given once daily.

Placebo

Oral tablet to be given once daily for 12 weeks of treatment. Patients randomised to the placebo arm will be mock-re-randomised (switch in blinded conditions) to ibodutant at week 13 for additional 4 weeks of treatment.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral tablet, (identical in appearance and weight to ibodutant tablets), to be given once daily.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ibodutant 10 mg

Oral tablet, to be given once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Oral tablet, (identical in appearance and weight to ibodutant tablets), to be given once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Code: MEN 15596 Sugar pill

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

At screening:

* Female patients aged 18 years or older.
* Clinical diagnosis of IBS-D according to the following symptoms-based criteria as per Rome III modular questionnaire criteria:

1. Recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort for at least 3 days per month in the last 3 months associated with at least 2 of the following characteristics: a) improvement with defecation; b) onset associated with a change in the frequency of stool; c) onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool.
2. Symptom-onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis.
3. Loose or watery stools at least 25% of the time in the last 3 months AND hard or lumpy stools less than 25% of the time in the last 3 months.
4. Additional criterion: more than 3 bowel movements per day at least 25% of the time in the last 3 months.
* For patients older than 50 years OR patients with a positive family history of colorectal cancer: normal results from colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy performed within the last 5 years.
* For patients aged 65 years or older: absence of ischaemic colitis, microscopy colitis or any other organic gastrointestinal disease as evidenced by the results of a colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsy performed within 6 months.
* For women of childbearing potential: Use of a highly effective contraceptive method with a failure rate \<1% per year throughout the entire study period.
* Physical examination without clinically relevant abnormalities during screening.
* No clinically relevant abnormalities in 12-Lead ECG or in laboratory findings.
* Mentally competent, able to give written informed consent, and compliant to undergo all visits and procedures.
* Unrestricted access to a touch-tone telephone.
* Willingness to refrain from using loperamide within 3 days prior to run-in visit and during the run-in period.

Additional criteria at randomisation:

* During both weeks of the run-in period:

1. A weekly average of worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours with a score of ≥3.0 on a 0 to 10 point scale.
2. At least one bowel movement on each day.
3. A weekly average of at least 3 bowel movements per day.
4. At least one stool with a consistency of Type 6 or Type 7 according to the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) on at least 2 days per week.
5. Less than 2 bowel movements with a consistency of Type 1 or Type 2 according to the BSS per week.
* Adequate compliance with the e-diary recording procedure defined as at least 11 of 14 days (≥75%) of the nominal daily data entry.

Exclusion Criteria

* Male gender.
* Diagnosis of IBS with a subtype of constipation, mixed IBS, or un-subtyped IBS.
* Colonic or major abdominal surgery, any other major abdominal surgery or elective major surgery planned or expected during the study.
* History of organic GI abnormalities, inflammatory bowel diseases, complicated diverticulosis, ischaemic colitis, microscopic colitis.
* History of pancreatitis, active biliary duct disease, cholecystitis or symptomatic gallbladder stone disease in the previous 6 months.
* History of gluten enteropathy or lactose intolerance.
* Current or previous diagnosis of neoplasia.
* History of endometriosis.
* History of positive tests for ova or parasites, or clostridium difficile toxin or occult blood in the stool in the previous 6 months.
* History of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
* History of major cardiovascular events in the previous 6 months.
* Uncontrolled hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or abnormal thyroid function.
* Major psychiatric or neurological disorders or unstable medical condition which may compromise the efficacy and safety assessments.
* Evidence of clinically significant hepatic disease, severe renal insufficiency or anemia.
* Relevant changes in dietary habits, lifestyle, or exercise regimen in the previous 2 months.
* Use of prohibited concurrent medication within the previous month such as antibiotics, antimuscarinic drugs, drugs enhancing GI motility and analgesics.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
* Inability to understand or collaborate throughout the study.
* Participation in other clinical studies in the previous 4 weeks or concurrent enrollment in a clinical study.
* Any condition that would compromise the well-being of the patient.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Menarini Group

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan F Tack, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Lin Chang, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Digestive Health and Nutrition Clinic. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brandon, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Addison, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Newton, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Madisonville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Crowley, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Hartsdale, New York, United States

Site Status

Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Smyrna, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Hurst, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ste. Channelview, Texas, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Haskovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Veliko Tarnovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Karlovy Vary, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Orlicí, , Czechia

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Bobigny, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Częstochowa, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, Jud. Mures, Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, Mureș County, Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Kaluga, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Mataró, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Penzance, Cornwall, United Kingdom

Site Status

Chesterfield, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Inverness, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Doncaster, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicestershire, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, Devon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Sherwood, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Artesia, California, United States

Site Status

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Encino, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Bulgaria Czechia France Germany Italy Poland Romania Russia Spain United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-000894-56

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NAK-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.