Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentration in Posterior Cervical Fusion
NCT ID: NCT02068547
Last Updated: 2021-03-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-02-28
2017-04-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: Bone marrow aspirate concentration combined with locally harvested autograft results in equivalent rates of bony fusion, as compared to current best practice in high-risk patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessing Safety of Cervical Spine Fusion With NMP®
NCT07245940
A Prospective Study of NuCel® in Cervical Spine Fusion
NCT02381067
Allogeinic Bone Paste
NCT04605120
Injection of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate in Patients With Degenerative Disc Disease.
NCT05146583
Post-surgical Outcomes Measure Using the ERAS Protocol for Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
NCT04315090
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be sequentially randomized to one of two treatment groups. Group I, will receive current best practice for posterior instrumented fusion (locally harvested autograft, demineralized bone matrix, and cadaveric allograft). Group II, will receive locally harvested autograft and 20 cc of bone marrow aspirate concentration. To assist with analysis, we will collect information from patients' hematology results, obtained per their standard of care pre-operative workup. All patients will be treated post-operatively at the discretion of the treating surgeon. All patients will follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. At the 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up all patients will undergo flexion/extension X-rays, fusion will be defined as less than 2 mm or motion. A cervical spine CT may also be obtained at 24 months on all patients to assess fusion at the discretion of the treating surgeon. All radiographic assessments of fusion will be made by a Washington University staff radiologist, blinded to patient treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 - Surigical Best Practice
Group 1 will receive current best practice for posterior instrumented fusion (locally harvested autograft, demineralized bone matrix, and cadaveric allograft)
locally harvested autograft, demineralized bone matrix, and cadaveric allograft
Group 2 - autograft/BMAC
Group II, will receive locally harvested autograft and 20 cc of bone marrow aspirate concentration.
Bone Marrow Aspirate
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
locally harvested autograft, demineralized bone matrix, and cadaveric allograft
Bone Marrow Aspirate
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have at least one of the following high risk qualifications: BMI \>30, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Osteoporosis, Current smoker
* Able to cooperate in the completion of standardized outcome measures (multiple questionnaires)
* Willing and able to comply with study protocol
* Symptomatic cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy
* Scheduled for cervical alignment, allowing management with a posterior approach
Exclusion Criteria
* History of prior cervical instrumentation
* Requires an instrumented anterior cervical fusion
* History of underlying neurological condition affecting the cervical spine (MS, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, HIV)
* Pre-existent neurologic disorder or mental disorder that would preclude accurate evaluation (psychiatric disease, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease)
* History of previous cervical fusion at the operative site
* Pregnant
* Active malignancy
* Previous history of posterior cervical decompression
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Harvest Technologies
INDUSTRY
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wilson Z Ray, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201308043
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.