Comparison of Gabapentin and Pregabalin for Radicular Pain
NCT ID: NCT02064790
Last Updated: 2016-03-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
6 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-04-30
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Since these drugs are currently used off-label, there is limited empirical evidence regarding which agent is more efficacious compared to the other, and since their use in treating radicular pain is based mostly on anecdotal evidence so far, prescription of one or the other of these agents has been based on likely compliance (medication needed twice a day, three times a day) or whether or not the patients' insurance will pay for one or the other. This study will be a first step to better assist practitioners in counselling their patients on use of these medications in radiculopathy, examining rates of discontinuation due to side effects and what effects these medications have on perceived pain, function and quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Short-term Effectiveness of Gabapentin Versus Placebo in Acute Lumbosacral Radiculalgia by Herniation Disc (GRADE)
NCT04865042
Management of Pain Associated With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
NCT05324761
Neuropathic Pain Syndrome Patient Study (MK-0000-072)
NCT00570310
Chronic Low Back Pain Research Project
NCT00108550
Efficacy of Pregabalin in Patients With Radicular Pain
NCT00908375
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group G - receiving gabapentin
Receiving gabapentin as standard of care. No intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
Group P - receiving pregabalin
Receiving pregabalin as standard of care No intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
Group Z - no neuropathic agent
Receiving only conservative treatment No drug treatment No intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 18 years and older
* Able to provide informed consent either with or without a legally authorized representative
* Patients with VAS\> or = 4 (Visual Analog Pain score)
Exclusion Criteria
* Previously completed epidural injections within 3 weeks of the study
* Undergone cervical or lumbar surgery
* History of renal disease, metastatic disease to the spine, vertebral fractures
* Individuals with pending litigation, workers compensation claims or disability claims
* Unable to provide informed consent and no legally authorized representative is available
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Emory University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Diana Sodiq
Assistant Professor of Orthopaedics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Diana Sodiq, D.O.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00069871
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.