Comparison of Gabapentin and Pregabalin for Radicular Pain

NCT ID: NCT02064790

Last Updated: 2016-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although some studies show improvement of pain and associated effects of pain with off-label use of neuropathic agents for cervical or lumbar radiculopathy, there is limited published evidence so far. We propose to complete a year-long prospective, observational study as a pilot to recruit 400 patients within the year and follow their pain level, function, and QOL measures for 16 weeks to determine whether it is feasible to continue studying this group in the future. We expect that pain, function, and quality of life will be improved in the group of patients who are given neuropathic agents as an adjunct to other conservative treatments compared to the expected 65% of patients with similar symptoms who are treated conservatively without neuropathic agents. We do not expect a statistically significant difference between the two neuropathic agents.

Since these drugs are currently used off-label, there is limited empirical evidence regarding which agent is more efficacious compared to the other, and since their use in treating radicular pain is based mostly on anecdotal evidence so far, prescription of one or the other of these agents has been based on likely compliance (medication needed twice a day, three times a day) or whether or not the patients' insurance will pay for one or the other. This study will be a first step to better assist practitioners in counselling their patients on use of these medications in radiculopathy, examining rates of discontinuation due to side effects and what effects these medications have on perceived pain, function and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radicular; Neuropathic, Lumbar, Lumbosacral Radicular; Neuropathic, Cervical

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group G - receiving gabapentin

Receiving gabapentin as standard of care. No intervention

No interventions assigned to this group

Group P - receiving pregabalin

Receiving pregabalin as standard of care No intervention

No interventions assigned to this group

Group Z - no neuropathic agent

Receiving only conservative treatment No drug treatment No intervention

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cervical or lumbar radicular complaints with clinical diagnosis of radiculopathy or sciatica
* Aged 18 years and older
* Able to provide informed consent either with or without a legally authorized representative
* Patients with VAS\> or = 4 (Visual Analog Pain score)

Exclusion Criteria

* Under the age of 18
* Previously completed epidural injections within 3 weeks of the study
* Undergone cervical or lumbar surgery
* History of renal disease, metastatic disease to the spine, vertebral fractures
* Individuals with pending litigation, workers compensation claims or disability claims
* Unable to provide informed consent and no legally authorized representative is available
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Diana Sodiq

Assistant Professor of Orthopaedics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Diana Sodiq, D.O.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Center

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00069871

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pregabalin in CIPN
NCT02394951 COMPLETED NA