A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of 7 Days Treatment With a Novel Analgesic in Subjects With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
NCT ID: NCT01485094
Last Updated: 2019-10-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
114 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-29
2013-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A 13-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Study Of Pregabalin For Postherpetic Neuralgia
NCT00394901
Neuropathic Pain Syndrome Patient Study (MK-0000-072)
NCT00570310
Placebo-controlled Safety and Efficacy Study of Pregabalin in Subjects With Post-traumatic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
NCT01701362
A Study To Compare Pregabalin/PF-00489791 Combination Versus Pregabalin Alone In Post-Herpetic Neuralgia
NCT00599638
Efficacy of Pregabalin for the Treatment of Acute Herpetic Neuralgia
NCT03809702
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The enrollment visit took place Day -28 to Day -16. Participants tapered down their existing medication from Visit 2 (Day -17 to Day -5) to Visit 3 and were given rescue medication (paracetamol/acetaminophen). At Visit 3 participants were hospitalized (Day -4). The baseline evaluation period took place from Day -3 to Day -1. Randomization to one of the three treatment arms was possible after the last assessment on Day - 1 alternatively randomization took place on Day 1. This was followed by the double-blind treatment period (Day 1 to Day 7). The participants were follow-up thereafter up to day 36 (Day 34 to 38). Participants were permitted to resume their previous medication.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Matching placebo
Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.
Matching Placebo
Matching Placebo capsules to the over-encapsulated Pregabalin capsules and Matching Placebo oral solution to the GRT6010 solution.
Capsules twice daily on Days 1 to 7. Solution once daily.
GRT6010
Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.
GRT6010
Oral solution given once daily.
Pregabalin
Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.
Pregabalin
Over-encapsulated pregabalin capsules 75mg twice daily on Days 1 to 3, and 150mg twice daily on Days 4 to 7.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GRT6010
Oral solution given once daily.
Pregabalin
Over-encapsulated pregabalin capsules 75mg twice daily on Days 1 to 3, and 150mg twice daily on Days 4 to 7.
Matching Placebo
Matching Placebo capsules to the over-encapsulated Pregabalin capsules and Matching Placebo oral solution to the GRT6010 solution.
Capsules twice daily on Days 1 to 7. Solution once daily.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of persistent neuropathic pain for at least 6 months at the time of the Enrollment Visit. Allowed reasons for neuropathic pain are: modified radical mastectomy, breast conserving surgery, or cosmetic breast surgery. \[Germany: subjects after cosmetic breast surgery may not be enrolled.\]
* Presence of "probable" or "definite" neuropathic pain.
* Presence of dynamic mechanical allodynia on the affected side, or alternatively, the mechanical pain sensitivity for any of the pinprick stimuli is higher on the affected compared to the contralateral side.
* At either Visit 5 or Visit 6: Presence of an average evoked pain intensity score of \>20 on the 0 100 point numeric rating scale (NRS) for at least 1 of the 3 clinical sub-tests for dynamic mechanical allodynia (i.e., standardized brush, cotton wool tip or cotton wisp). The average will be calculated as the arithmetic mean of all measurements per sub test. Alternatively, the arithmetic mean of the 5 test replicates for any of the pinprick stimuli for mechanical pain sensitivity is at least 3 times higher for the affected side compared to the contralateral side.
* Presence of an average ongoing pain intensity score of \>4 to \<9 on the 0-10 point numerical rating scale (NRS) without the use of rescue medication within the 3 day Baseline pain intensity evaluation Period with at least 7 of 9 assessments being present.
* Dissatisfaction with the current treatment (i.e., lack of efficacy or intolerable side effects) if taking an opioid or non opioid analgesic medication for the painful neuropathy before enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Either active hepatitis within the past 3 months or presence of chronic hepatitis irrespective of its activity status.
* Estimated creatinine clearance of less than 60 mL/minute x 1.73 m2 at either Visit 1 or at Visit 3.
* Clinically relevant cardiac disease (e.g., unstable angina pectoris, angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society \[CCS\] Grade III to IV, acute myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, cardiac insufficiency New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Class III to IV).
* Electrocardiogram (ECG) with clinically relevant findings at either Visit 1 or at Visit 3, including but not limited to repeated prolongation of QTc \> 450 ms (Fridericia correction), or a history of additional risk factors for torsade de pointes (e.g., family history of Long QT Syndrome).
* Clinically relevant pulmonary disease (e.g., Medical Research Council breathlessness scale of 2 or above).
* Specific antitumor therapy within the last 6 months, e.g., adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy, biologics, or angiogenesis inhibitors.
* CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype as predicted by CYP2D6 genotyping.
* Presence of confounding pain conditions (e.g., ulnar nerve entrapment, radial nerve injury associated with major soft-tissue or bone damage, cervico-thoracic radiculopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, or complex regional pain syndrome type I or type II).
* Phantom breast or phantom limb pain.
* Presence of exclusively negative symptoms of neuropathic pain (e.g., hypoesthesia or total anesthesia) in the affected area.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grünenthal GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Director Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Grünenthal GmbH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
DEU001
Mainz, , Germany
DEU002
Regensburg, , Germany
HUN004
Esztergom, , Hungary
HUN003
Győr, , Hungary
HUN001
Miskolc, , Hungary
HUN008
Szikszó, , Hungary
POL002
Gdansk, , Poland
POL004
Lublin, , Poland
POL005
Warsaw, , Poland
GBR003
Belfast, , United Kingdom
GBR001
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
GBR002
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-002092-42
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
967165
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.