A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of 7 Days Treatment With a Novel Analgesic in Subjects With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

NCT ID: NCT01485094

Last Updated: 2019-10-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether a novel analgesic is effective in treating of neuropathic pain caused by herpetic infection, surgery, or trauma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This trial evaluates the effectiveness of a novel analgesic in peripheral neuropathic pain in a mixed patient population. Participants were treated for one week and randomly assigned to the novel analgesic, pregabalin, or placebo. Pain will be characterized before and at the end of this period. This trial required the participants to stay at the investigational site for 14 consecutive days.

The enrollment visit took place Day -28 to Day -16. Participants tapered down their existing medication from Visit 2 (Day -17 to Day -5) to Visit 3 and were given rescue medication (paracetamol/acetaminophen). At Visit 3 participants were hospitalized (Day -4). The baseline evaluation period took place from Day -3 to Day -1. Randomization to one of the three treatment arms was possible after the last assessment on Day - 1 alternatively randomization took place on Day 1. This was followed by the double-blind treatment period (Day 1 to Day 7). The participants were follow-up thereafter up to day 36 (Day 34 to 38). Participants were permitted to resume their previous medication.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuralgia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Matching placebo

Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Matching Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching Placebo capsules to the over-encapsulated Pregabalin capsules and Matching Placebo oral solution to the GRT6010 solution.

Capsules twice daily on Days 1 to 7. Solution once daily.

GRT6010

Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GRT6010

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral solution given once daily.

Pregabalin

Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pregabalin

Intervention Type DRUG

Over-encapsulated pregabalin capsules 75mg twice daily on Days 1 to 3, and 150mg twice daily on Days 4 to 7.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GRT6010

Oral solution given once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pregabalin

Over-encapsulated pregabalin capsules 75mg twice daily on Days 1 to 3, and 150mg twice daily on Days 4 to 7.

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching Placebo

Matching Placebo capsules to the over-encapsulated Pregabalin capsules and Matching Placebo oral solution to the GRT6010 solution.

Capsules twice daily on Days 1 to 7. Solution once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lyrica®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years to 75 years
* Presence of persistent neuropathic pain for at least 6 months at the time of the Enrollment Visit. Allowed reasons for neuropathic pain are: modified radical mastectomy, breast conserving surgery, or cosmetic breast surgery. \[Germany: subjects after cosmetic breast surgery may not be enrolled.\]
* Presence of "probable" or "definite" neuropathic pain.
* Presence of dynamic mechanical allodynia on the affected side, or alternatively, the mechanical pain sensitivity for any of the pinprick stimuli is higher on the affected compared to the contralateral side.
* At either Visit 5 or Visit 6: Presence of an average evoked pain intensity score of \>20 on the 0 100 point numeric rating scale (NRS) for at least 1 of the 3 clinical sub-tests for dynamic mechanical allodynia (i.e., standardized brush, cotton wool tip or cotton wisp). The average will be calculated as the arithmetic mean of all measurements per sub test. Alternatively, the arithmetic mean of the 5 test replicates for any of the pinprick stimuli for mechanical pain sensitivity is at least 3 times higher for the affected side compared to the contralateral side.
* Presence of an average ongoing pain intensity score of \>4 to \<9 on the 0-10 point numerical rating scale (NRS) without the use of rescue medication within the 3 day Baseline pain intensity evaluation Period with at least 7 of 9 assessments being present.
* Dissatisfaction with the current treatment (i.e., lack of efficacy or intolerable side effects) if taking an opioid or non opioid analgesic medication for the painful neuropathy before enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any kind of hepatic impairment at Visit 1 or at Visit 3.
* Either active hepatitis within the past 3 months or presence of chronic hepatitis irrespective of its activity status.
* Estimated creatinine clearance of less than 60 mL/minute x 1.73 m2 at either Visit 1 or at Visit 3.
* Clinically relevant cardiac disease (e.g., unstable angina pectoris, angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society \[CCS\] Grade III to IV, acute myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, cardiac insufficiency New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Class III to IV).
* Electrocardiogram (ECG) with clinically relevant findings at either Visit 1 or at Visit 3, including but not limited to repeated prolongation of QTc \> 450 ms (Fridericia correction), or a history of additional risk factors for torsade de pointes (e.g., family history of Long QT Syndrome).
* Clinically relevant pulmonary disease (e.g., Medical Research Council breathlessness scale of 2 or above).
* Specific antitumor therapy within the last 6 months, e.g., adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy, biologics, or angiogenesis inhibitors.
* CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype as predicted by CYP2D6 genotyping.
* Presence of confounding pain conditions (e.g., ulnar nerve entrapment, radial nerve injury associated with major soft-tissue or bone damage, cervico-thoracic radiculopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, or complex regional pain syndrome type I or type II).
* Phantom breast or phantom limb pain.
* Presence of exclusively negative symptoms of neuropathic pain (e.g., hypoesthesia or total anesthesia) in the affected area.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Grünenthal GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Director Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Grünenthal GmbH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

DEU001

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

DEU002

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

HUN004

Esztergom, , Hungary

Site Status

HUN003

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

HUN001

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

HUN008

Szikszó, , Hungary

Site Status

POL002

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

POL004

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

POL005

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

GBR003

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GBR001

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GBR002

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Hungary Poland United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-002092-42

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

967165

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.