Haemodiafiltration vs Conventional Haemodialysis in Children

NCT ID: NCT02063776

Last Updated: 2018-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Children on conventional haemodialysis (HD) die of heart disease. Also, they can be malnourished and short. Haemodiafiltration (HDF) is a newer type of dialysis that achieves better removal of toxins and excess fluid than HD. On HDF, adults have a longer survival and children show improved growth, but mechanisms are not understood.

We will follow children in the UK and Europe to compare HDF and HD. We will monitor growth, heart and blood vessel scans, blood markers and quality of life. If the 3H (HDF-Hearts-Height) study shows reduced cardiovascular morbidity and better growth, HDF may be adopted as the preferred type of dialysis in children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Children on conventional haemodialysis (HD) have a 1000-fold higher mortality than their healthy peers and can have malnutrition and growth retardation. Haemodiafiltration (HDF) achieves better clearance of uraemic solutes across a wide molecular-weight range and performs greater ultrafiltration than conventional HD. Randomised controlled trials in adults have shown 35-45% improved survival and reduced cardiovascular mortality on HDF with high convection volumes. Excellent catch-up growth has been demonstrated in children on HDF, but mechanisms are poorly understood.

Hypothesis: HDF improves the cardiovascular risk profile, growth and quality of life (QoL) compared to conventional HD. Primary outcome measures are carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and height standard deviation score (SDS).

Plan of investigation: Incident and prevalent patients on HDF or HD who are expected to remain on dialysis for \>6-months and who have a single pool Kt/v\>1.2 will be compared in a 1:1 study design. Anthropometric measures (height SDS, body mass index SDS) and QoL questionnaires will be monitored at baseline and 6-monthly. Cardiovascular measures (cIMT, pulse wave velocity, left ventricular mass index and 24-hour BP) will be measured annually. 6-monthly blood tests will measure nutritional biomarkers, mineral dysregulation, inflammation and middle-molecule clearance. Outcome measures will be standardised to the convective clearance dose per m2 body surface area. Recruitment will continue for 2½ years with minimum follow-up of 6-months.

Children will be recruited from all UK dialysis units, but small patient numbers (10-12/year) necessitate collaborations with European centres. HDF and HD patients across Europe who are part of the Cardiovascular Comorbidity in Childhood CKD (4C) study will be included and vascular scans will be captured from this study. From ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry data we estimate \~100 children on HDF over the study period.

Outcomes: If the 3H (HDF-Hearts-Height) study shows that HDF reduces cardiovascular morbidity and improves growth it may lead to HDF being adopted as the standard for in-centre dialysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Children Haemodialysis Haemodiafiltration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Children on HDF

No interventions assigned to this group

Children on conventional HD

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. All children 5 - 21 years age undergoing HDF in paediatric dialysis centres (incident and prevalent patients)
2. Age-matched HD patients
3. Prevalent HDF and HD patients must achieve a single pool Kt/v\>1.2 in the month preceding recruitment

Exclusion Criteria

1\. Children in whom a living donor kidney transplant is planned within 6-months of start of dialysis
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rukshana C Shroff, MD FRCPCH PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rukshana Shroff

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shroff R, Bayazit A, Stefanidis CJ, Askiti V, Azukaitis K, Canpolat N, Agbas A, Anarat A, Aoun B, Bakkaloglu S, Bhowruth D, Borzych-Duzalka D, Bulut IK, Buscher R, Dempster C, Duzova A, Habbig S, Hayes W, Hegde S, Krid S, Licht C, Litwin M, Mayes M, Mir S, Nemec R, Obrycki L, Paglialonga F, Picca S, Ranchin B, Samaille C, Shenoy M, Sinha M, Smith C, Spasojevic B, Vidal E, Vondrak K, Yilmaz A, Zaloszyc A, Fischbach M, Schaefer F, Schmitt CP. Effect of haemodiafiltration vs conventional haemodialysis on growth and cardiovascular outcomes in children - the HDF, heart and height (3H) study. BMC Nephrol. 2018 Aug 10;19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0998-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30097064 (View on PubMed)

Agbas A, Canpolat N, Caliskan S, Yilmaz A, Ekmekci H, Mayes M, Aitkenhead H, Schaefer F, Sever L, Shroff R. Hemodiafiltration is associated with reduced inflammation, oxidative stress and improved endothelial risk profile compared to high-flux hemodialysis in children. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 18;13(6):e0198320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198320. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29912924 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13NU02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain Swelling During Dialysis
NCT01396863 COMPLETED NA