Biomarkers and Antithrombotic Treatment in Cervical Artery Dissection - TREAT-CAD

NCT ID: NCT02046460

Last Updated: 2024-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

194 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary objective: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) to anticoagulant treatment (vitamin K antagonists) in CAD-patients with regard to outcome and complication measures.

Methods: Randomized controlled, open labeled multicenter, non-inferiority trial with blinded assessment of outcome events.

Primary endpoint: Primary composite outcome measure - labeled Cerebrovascular Ischemia, major Hemorrhagic events or Death (CIHD) - includes the following efficacy and safety outcome measures during the treatment period: (i) occurrence of any stroke\*, new acute lesions on diffusion weighted MRI (ii) any major extracranial hemorrhage, any symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and any asymptomatic micro- or macrobleeds, (iii) death.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Substudies:

1. In-depth analysis of the TREAT-CAD randomized trial:

The investigators will perform a subgroup analysis on the per-protocol population investigating if the antithrombotic treatment effect (anticoagulation versus aspirin) depends on specific patient baseline characteristics. The investigators will look at the following subgroups: Presenting with cerebral ischemia - either clinical ischemic events, MRI lesions, or both - versus presenting with local symptoms only, occlusion of the dissected artery at baseline (no/yes), early versus delayed treatment start (divided by the median of the study population), acute recanalization therapy including intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular therapy (no/yes), intracranial extension of the dissected artery (no/yes), site of dissection defined as internal carotid artery dissection versus vertebral artery dissection, single versus multivessel dissection, younger versus older age (divided by the median of the study population), and male versus female.
2. TCD Monitoring Substudy:

The objective of the TREAT-CAD transcranial Doppler (TCD) substudy is to (i) detect the frequency of microembolic signals (MES) in CAD patients, stratified to the type of treatment (aspirin vs. anticoagulation) - in the setting of an RCT (randomized controlled trial)- and (ii) to evaluate the meaning of MES by addressing the following questions: (a) Is there an association of MES (presence or number) with the occurrence of clinical and/or surrogate MR (magnetic resonance) outcome measures; (b) Is there an interaction between MES, type of treatment and outcome events. Participants are asked to allow a 6-h TCD monitoring in between day 1 and day 4 since start of the allocated study treatment. Recordings were allowed to be split in up to three episodes (2 h each). In patients with ICAD (internal carotid artery dissection), the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery is investigated. In patients with VAD (vertebral artery dissection), the ipsilateral posterior cerebral artery is investigated.
3. Biomarker substudy:

The objective of the biomarker study is to investigate whether the plasma level of MMP9 (matrix-metalloproteinase 9) and the ratio of the plasma MMP9 to TIMP2 (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2) is associated with efficacy and safety measures in CAD patients, when stratified to the allocated treatment regime. Plasma samples are collected from participants at baseline (i.e., prior to start of the allocated treatment within the TREAT-CAD main study) and at Follow-up visit 1. The specific focus on MMP9 and TIMP2 is based on preliminary observational data pointing to higher MMP9 and MMP9/TIMP2 ratios in CAD versus control patients.
4. 6 Month-follow-up for TREAT-CAD To compare (i) the frequency of clinical and MRI outcomes 6 months after cervical artery dissection among the per-protocol participants of the TREAT-CAD trial and (ii) to focus on events occurring between 3 and 6 months, stratified to the type of antithrombotic medication taken (as-treated analysis).
5. Detailed imaging analysis in the TREAT-CAD study To identify possible imaging risk factors for recurrent stroke and to evaluate the dependence of antithromobotic therapy on imaging factors.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Artery Dissection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
PROBE-Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded assessment of end-points.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oral Anticoagulation

Vitamin K-Antagonists, target INR 2.0-3.0

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitamin K antagonist

Intervention Type DRUG

Vitamin K-antagonists, target INR 2.0-3.0

Antiplatelets

Acetylsalicylic acid, 300mg o.p.d.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acetylsalicylic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Acetylsalicylic acid, 300mg o.p.d.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetylsalicylic acid

Acetylsalicylic acid, 300mg o.p.d.

Intervention Type DRUG

Vitamin K antagonist

Vitamin K-antagonists, target INR 2.0-3.0

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ASA Phenprocoumon, Warfarin, Acenocoumarol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Acute ischemic or non-ischemic symptoms within 2 weeks
2. Verification of CAD-diagnosis (carotid and/or vertebral) by MR-techniques (at least one):

* mural hematoma or
* pseudo-aneurysm or
* long filiform stenosis or
* intimal flap or
* double lumen or
* occlusion situated more than 2 cm above the bifurcation of the carotid artery, revealing a pseudo aneurysm or a long filiform stenosis after recanalisation.
3. Written informed consent by patient or next-to-kin
4. 24h latency period in case of thrombolysis
5. Age \> 18 years by time of inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

1. MR-contraindications (claustrophobia precluding MRI: patients agreeing to undergo MRI scanning with mild sedation may be entered into the study)
2. Contraindications to the use of anticoagulation (vitamin k antagonists, heparin) or ASA (according to the Swiss "Arzneimittelkompendium" http://www.compendium.ch/search/de or the "Rote Liste" (German centers) or "Lægemiddelstyrelsen - produktresume" for the Danish center (https://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/da/bivirkninger/find-medicin/produktresumeer/) and the judgment of the treating physician)
3. Pregnancy (Note: for women in child bearing age a pregnancy test has to be done prior to study entry)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stefan Engelter

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefan Engelter

Prof. Dr. med., MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefan T. Engelter, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Neurorehab. Felix Platter, University of Basel, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital, Stroke Center Bispebjerg Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

University Hospital, Stroke Center Charite Berlin, Germany

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital, Stroke Center LMU Munich, Germany

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Kantonsspital, Stroke Center Aarau, Switzerland

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

University Hospital, Stroke Center Basel, Switzerland

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

University Hospital, Stroke Center Inselspital Berne, Switzerland

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

University Hospital, Stroke Center Geneva, Switzerland

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

University Hospital, Stroke Center CHUV Lausanne, Switzerland

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital, Stroke Center St. Gallen, Switzerland

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

University Hospital, Stroke Center Zurich, Switzerland

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark Germany Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Traenka C, Gensicke H, Schaedelin S, Luft A, Arnold M, Michel P, Kagi G, Kahles T, Nolte CH, Kellert L, Rosenbaum S, Sztaizel R, Brehm A, Stippich C, Psychogios M, Lyrer P, Engelter ST; TREAT-CAD investigators. Biomarkers and antithrombotic treatment in cervical artery dissection - Design of the TREAT-CAD randomised trial. Eur Stroke J. 2020 Sep;5(3):309-319. doi: 10.1177/2396987320921151. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33072885 (View on PubMed)

Engelter ST, Traenka C, Gensicke H, Schaedelin SA, Luft AR, Simonetti BG, Fischer U, Michel P, Sirimarco G, Kagi G, Vehoff J, Nedeltchev K, Kahles T, Kellert L, Rosenbaum S, von Rennenberg R, Sztajzel R, Leib SL, Jung S, Gralla J, Bruni N, Seiffge D, Feil K, Polymeris AA, Steiner L, Hamann J, Bonati LH, Brehm A, De Marchis GM, Peters N, Stippich C, Nolte CH, Christensen H, Wegener S, Psychogios MN, Arnold M, Lyrer P; TREAT-CAD investigators. Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 May;20(5):341-350. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00044-2. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33765420 (View on PubMed)

Engelter ST, Enz LS, Ravanelli F, Kaufmann JE, Gensicke H, Schaedelin S, Luft AR, Globas C, Goeggel-Simonetti B, Fischer U, Strambo D, Kagi G, Nedeltchev K, Kahles T, Kellert L, Rosenbaum S, von Rennenberg R, Brehm A, Seiffge D, Renaud S, Brandt T, Sarikaya H, Zietz A, Wischmann J, Polymeris AA, Fischer S, Bonati LH, De Marchis GM, Peters N, Nolte CH, Christensen H, Wegener S, Psychogios MN, Arnold M, Lyrer P, Traenka C. The 6-months follow-up of the TREAT-CAD trial: Aspirin versus anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with cervical artery dissection. Eur Stroke J. 2025 Sep;10(3):871-881. doi: 10.1177/23969873251315362. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39910883 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

340/12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Triple vs. Dual Therapy
NCT02080858 COMPLETED PHASE1