Study of Sequential High-dose Chemotherapy in Children With High Risk Medulloblastoma

NCT ID: NCT02025881

Last Updated: 2024-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-14

Study Completion Date

2020-10-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The trial includes i) the evaluation of the efficacy of a treatment strategy, designed as a phase II trial, and ii) a dose-finding part.

The Phase II trial is an open label, non-randomized, multicentre trial without control group. A Bayesian approach will be used to analyse the EFS, assuming a cure model. We will use three prior distributions of the EFS; (1) an enthusiastic prior distribution, (2) a pessimistic prior distribution, and (3) a non-informative prior distribution. As the patient outcomes in the trial will be recorded, the subsequent distribution of the outcome probability under experimental treatment will be computed by applying Bayes' theorem, which yields an estimated EFS probability with a 95% credibility interval (measure of Bayesian precision). Two interim analyses are planned to monitor the efficacy data (early stopping rules for futility or inefficacy).

The final analysis of efficacy will be made on an intention to treat basis, including all recruited patients, 3 years after recruitment of the last patient.

Due to the uncertainty on the dose of cyclophosphamide that can be given in combination with Busilvex for the last chemotherapy course in patients in complete response after intensification chemotherapy treatment, a dose-finding subtrial will be performed to address this issue (Phase I part). The dose escalation of cyclophosphamide will be performed using the Continual Reassessment Method in a Bayesian framework.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High-risk Medulloblastoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment

Carboplatin + etoposide then thiotepa then Cyclophosphamide + Busilvex. If insufficient response: TEMIRI + etoposide/radiotherapy + temozolomide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carboplatin + etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Carboplatin 160 mg/m\^2 Day 1 to day 5, as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour. Dilution in 5 % glucose saline or sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%).

Etoposide 100 mg/m\^2 D ay 1 to day 5, as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour. Dilution in physiological saline or 5 % glucose saline while not exceeding a concentration of 0.4 mg/ml etoposide in the infusion bottle.

Thiotepa

Intervention Type DRUG

Thiotepa 200 mg/m² Day-3 to day-1, as an intravenously infusion over 1 hour dilution in 200 ml/m\^2 of 5% glucose saline or sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%).

Cyclophosphamide + Busilvex

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide:

* Level 1 20 mg/kg/day
* Level 2 30 mg/kg/day
* Level 3 40 mg/kg/day
* Level 4 50 mg/kg/day

Busilvex:

\< 9 kgs 0.8 mg/kg/dose -\> 3.2 mg/kg/day; 9 à \< 16 kgs 0.96 mg/kg/dose -\> 3.84 mg/kg/day; 16 à 23 kgs 0.88 mg/kg/dose -\> 3.52 mg/kg/day; \> 23 à 34 kgs 0.76 mg/kg/dose -\> 3.04 mg/kg/day; \> 34 kgs -\> 0.64 mg/kg/dose.

Temozolimide + Irinotecan

Intervention Type DRUG

During 2 cycles of 21 days:

* Temozolomide: 100 mg/m\^2/day PO from Day 1 to Day 5;
* Irinotecan: 10 mg/m\^2/day IV from Day 1 to Day 5 + from Day 8 to Day 12

Etoposide + radiotherapy

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

* Etoposide: 35 mg/m\^2/day PO during 21days
* Radiotherapy: 1.8 Gy/fraction/day (total dose: 54 Gy)

Temozolomide

Intervention Type DRUG

150 mg/m\^2/day PO during 5 days, during 6 cycles of 21 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Carboplatin + etoposide

Carboplatin 160 mg/m\^2 Day 1 to day 5, as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour. Dilution in 5 % glucose saline or sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%).

Etoposide 100 mg/m\^2 D ay 1 to day 5, as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour. Dilution in physiological saline or 5 % glucose saline while not exceeding a concentration of 0.4 mg/ml etoposide in the infusion bottle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Thiotepa

Thiotepa 200 mg/m² Day-3 to day-1, as an intravenously infusion over 1 hour dilution in 200 ml/m\^2 of 5% glucose saline or sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%).

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide + Busilvex

Cyclophosphamide:

* Level 1 20 mg/kg/day
* Level 2 30 mg/kg/day
* Level 3 40 mg/kg/day
* Level 4 50 mg/kg/day

Busilvex:

\< 9 kgs 0.8 mg/kg/dose -\> 3.2 mg/kg/day; 9 à \< 16 kgs 0.96 mg/kg/dose -\> 3.84 mg/kg/day; 16 à 23 kgs 0.88 mg/kg/dose -\> 3.52 mg/kg/day; \> 23 à 34 kgs 0.76 mg/kg/dose -\> 3.04 mg/kg/day; \> 34 kgs -\> 0.64 mg/kg/dose.

Intervention Type DRUG

Temozolimide + Irinotecan

During 2 cycles of 21 days:

* Temozolomide: 100 mg/m\^2/day PO from Day 1 to Day 5;
* Irinotecan: 10 mg/m\^2/day IV from Day 1 to Day 5 + from Day 8 to Day 12

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide + radiotherapy

* Etoposide: 35 mg/m\^2/day PO during 21days
* Radiotherapy: 1.8 Gy/fraction/day (total dose: 54 Gy)

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Temozolomide

150 mg/m\^2/day PO during 5 days, during 6 cycles of 21 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histological diagnosis of medulloblastoma with no INI-1 loss
* High risk medulloblastoma defined by at least one of the following conditions:

* Newly diagnosed classical metastatic medulloblastoma
* Newly diagnosed anaplastic/large cell medulloblastoma or other unfavourable histology confirmed by review and coordinating investigator
* Newly diagnosed medulloblastoma with amplification of c-myc or N-myc
* Age at initial biopsy less or equal than 5 years
* Weight compatible with leukapheresis
* Ability to comply with requirements for submission of materials for central review
* Nutritional and general status compatible with this therapy, Lansky play score \>/= 30%
* Estimated life expectancy \>/=3 months
* No organ toxicity other than neurological symptoms (grade \>2 according to NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria v4.0 grading system)
* No prior irradiation or chemotherapy (except Vepesid - CBP)
* Written informed consent from parents or legal guardian
* All patients must be affiliated to a social security regimen or be a beneficiary of the same in order to be included in the study.


* Complete response after intensification phase confirmed by central review
* Adequate hepatic and renal function

Exclusion Criteria

* Desmoplastic medulloblastoma
* Atypical Teratoid rhabdoid tumour
* Uncontrolled active or symptomatic intracranial hypertension
* Patient incapable of undergoing medical follow-up
* Relapse of medulloblastoma
Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christelle Dufour, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, Val De Marne, France

Site Status

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) - Site Paul Papin

Angers, , France

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

Centre Léon Bérard

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CHU La Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHU Nancy Brabois

Nancy, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nice - Hôpital L'Archet 2

Nice, , France

Site Status

Institut Curie

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Américain

Reims, , France

Site Status

CHU Hôpital Sud

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CHRU Hautepierre

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Hôpital des enfants

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012/1908

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2012-004842-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.