Comparison of Neurocognitive Outcome in Two Standard Regimen for Treatment of Low-risk Medulloblastoma

NCT ID: NCT07291102

Last Updated: 2025-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-07-01

Study Completion Date

2038-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a trial to compare neurocognitive outcomes in the intent-to-treat population 2.5 years after diagnosis between patients with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic, SHH-activated, TP53-wt, non-MYC amplified MF randomized to the interventional arms A ("Head Start 4") or B (HIT-SKK).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, two highly effective irradiation-sparing treatment regimens are being compared in patients with low-risk early childhood MB:

1. Arm A: The "Head Start" 4 regimen developed by the North American Head Start Consortium. This approach uses intensive Induction chemotherapy and Consolidation with HDCT and has led to equally favorable results in this subgroup -- 3y PFS was 96% for infants and young children with M0, SHH MB; 5y EFS was 93% for M0, DMB on the predecessor "Head Start" 3 study.
2. Arm B: The HIT-SKK regimen developed within the GPOH. This regimen combines systemic chemotherapy with intraventricular MTX, leading to 93% 5-year PFS in low-risk patients.

Both treatment regimens use high-dose i.v. MTX, but only the HIT-SKK regimen also uses intraventricular administration of MTX directly into the CSF in addition to i.v. MTX. Given the long-term neurocognitive deficits of MTX have been described in childhood leukemia, and the pathogenesis of MTX-induced CNS-damage has been described, this has raised some concerns. Similarly, highly intensive, HDCT containing "Head Start" chemotherapy carries specific risks for the neurocognitive outcomes. Encouragingly, five years after HIT-SKK treatment including intraventricular MTX, young children with MB have a mean fluid intelligence score of 93.8 points. The full-scale IQ after "Head Start" chemotherapy is 95.4 and likewise within normal range. On the other hand, highly intensive, HDCT/AuHCR containing "Head Start" chemotherapy carries specific risks for the neurocognitive outcomes. However, neurocognitive outcomes after the HIT-SKK and "Head Start" chemotherapy regimens are difficult to compare from existing data, because of small sample sizes and inhomogeneous assessment tools used in prior studies. Therefore, a confirmatory study utilizing the same measures administered at the same time points is required to identify clinically relevant differences. In addition, survival, occurrence of second malignancies, neurological and endocrine deficits, hearing loss, and psychosocial comorbidities are also of high relevance in survivors of MB and may differ after both regimens. Since these also severely limit the survivors' potential for activity and participation in everyday life and affect their parents and siblings as well, this information will also be recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Medulloblastoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: "Head Start" 4

Arm A consists of 3 to 5 Induction chemotherapy cycles and one high-dose chemotherapy cycle evaluated in the "Head Start" 4 study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bridging Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

One bridging chemotherapy cycle consists of five days of therapy using Carboplatin and etoposide

Induction Cycles A1-A3

Intervention Type DRUG

Cisplatin, vincristin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate

Induction Cycles A4-5

Intervention Type DRUG

Cisplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate

Consolidation Cycle A6

Intervention Type DRUG

Carboplatin, thiotepa, etoposide

Arm B: HIT-SKK

Arm B consists of 3 to 5 cycles of chemotherapy evaluated in the HIT-SKK'92 (Rutkowski et al. 2005) and HIT-2000 (NCT00303810) clinical studies.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bridging Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

One bridging chemotherapy cycle consists of five days of therapy using Carboplatin and etoposide

HIT-SKK Chemotherapy Cycles B1-3

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, carboplatin, etoposide, i.ventri. methotrexate

Modified HIT-SKK Cycle B4-5

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, carboplatin, etoposide

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bridging Chemotherapy

One bridging chemotherapy cycle consists of five days of therapy using Carboplatin and etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Induction Cycles A1-A3

Cisplatin, vincristin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Induction Cycles A4-5

Cisplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Consolidation Cycle A6

Carboplatin, thiotepa, etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

HIT-SKK Chemotherapy Cycles B1-3

Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, carboplatin, etoposide, i.ventri. methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Modified HIT-SKK Cycle B4-5

Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, carboplatin, etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age at diagnosis \< 5 years
* Patients with institutional suspicion or diagnosis of SHH-activated MB
* Patient and family in social circumstances that will allow neuropsychological follow-up
* Ability of parents/legal representatives to understand the patient information and to personally sign and date the informed consent to participate in screening procedures
* Patient and the parents/legal representative are able and willing to participate in the entire study (if patient is eligible)


* Patients with SHH-activated MB, TP53-wt demonstrated by IHC for Gab1 or p75-NGFR, Yap1, beta-catenin, and TP53 (lack of strong and widespread nuclear p53 positivity) on central review according to WHO classification 2021.
* No clinical evidence of extra-CNS metastases
* Negative CSF cytology
* No prior therapy for MB other than surgery
* No other medical contraindications to chemotherapy:
* No uncontrolled invasive fungal infection or other severe systemic infection requiring system/parental therapy
* No other severe organ dysfunctions, which cannot be clinically controlled
* No concomitant use with yellow fever vaccine and with live virus and bacterial vaccines
* No demyelinating form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome
* Assessment of hearing function completed
* No evidence of cancer predisposition syndromes other than Gorlin syndrome or ELP1, GPR161 germline alterations.
* Provided written informed consent by parent(s)/parent representative(s) by bridging chemotherapy
* Patient should be enrolled within 28 days after diagnosis. Bridging chemotherapy can start as early as criteria for enrollment are met, and must start no later than 33 days after diagnosis

* Other histology than SHH MB


* Patient has received bridging chemotherapy as described in this protocol
* Patients with centrally reviewed SHH-activated MB, TP53-wt, according to WHO classification 2021
* Absence of metastatic disease on central radiology review
* Exclusion of TP53-mutation by DNA sequencing of the TP53-gene from tumor tissue by central review. Results from local institution will be accepted if raw data of this analysis is forwarded to the national central review institution
* Confirmation of SHH activation by DNA methylation-based classification on central review. Results from local institution will be accepted if raw data of this analysis is forwarded to the national central review institution
* No amplification of MYC (amplification of MYCN allowed). Array-based technologies (850k array, molecular inversion probe assay (MIP)), array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) or next generation sequencing (NGS) DNA sequencing coverage MYC locus will be used. If these alternative assays give any indication of possible amplification, FISH will be performed on central review.
* No other medical contraindications to chemotherapy:
* No uncontrolled invasive fungal infection or other severe systemic infection requiring system/parental therapy
* No other severe organ dysfunctions, which cannot be clinically controlled
* No concomitant use with yellow fever vaccine and with live virus and bacterial vaccines
* No demyelinating form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome
* Retrospective assessment of pre-operative health-related QoL (HR-QoL) measured by Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory
* Provided written informed consent by parent(s)/parent representative(s) for randomization

2. Patients with metastatic disease
3. TP53-mutated SHH MB
4. MYC amplified MB
5. Pre-existing condition incompatible with scheduled therapy (e.g. Fanconi anemia)
6. Patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus, e.g. due to perinatal intracranial haemorrhage, adueductal stenosis, or meningitis
7. Contraindication for any components of the randomized therapies, including HDCT and intraventricular chemotherapy. Note: postperative hydrocephalus is not a contraindication for i.ventr. MTX.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients previously treated for any other brain tumor or any type of malignant disease
* Patients, in whom compliance with toxicity management guidelines and study procedures cannot be assured
* History of hypersensitivity to an investigational medicinal product or to any drug with similar chemical structure or to any excipient present in the pharmaceutical form of an investigational medicinal product.
* Patients/parents who do not wish to abstain from treatment with live vaccines during study participation
* Patients with a language barrier too extensive to complete neuropsychological tests based on the investigator's judgement
* Patients with severe premorbid developmental delay (based on the investigator's judgement), which will not allow WPPSI-IV assessment after 2.5 years
* Patients cannot undergo MRI



-Patients are excluded from the interventional study if any of the following criteria are met:
Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

German Society of Paediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH gGmbH)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's of Alabama

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nationwide Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maryam Fouladi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Girish Dhall, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Children's Hospital of Alabama

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kelsey Troyer, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 16147228566

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Girish Dhall, MD

Role: primary

Maryam Fouladi, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-517133-40-00

Identifier Type: CTIS

Identifier Source: secondary_id

COGNITO-MB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id