Post-market Clinical Follow-up of a Magnetic Bone Conduction Implant (Cochlear Baha Attract System)

NCT ID: NCT02022085

Last Updated: 2018-10-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-30

Study Completion Date

2017-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The rationale behind this post-market clinical follow-up investigation is to collect data regarding the usability and clinical performance of the Baha Attract System in subjects with hearing impairment that are candidates for Baha surgery:

* to evaluate the efficacy of the Baha Attract System in terms of hearing performance compared to the unaided situation and compared to a pre-operative test situation using the sound processor on a Baha Softband;
* to evaluate the mid- and long-term safety of the Baha Attract System.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This investigation was designed to collect data regarding the usability and clinical performance of the Baha Attract System in subjects with hearing impairment that were candidates for Baha surgery.

The investigation was performed in an open design since it was not possible to perform the investigation in a blinded fashion. The main evaluations of the investigation, i.e. free-field hearing tests, are standard audiological procedures that are routinely used in daily clinical practice at hospitals worldwide for evaluation of hearing performance in hearing impaired patients. The primary efficacy evaluation, audiometric thresholds, renders comparable results across different sites and countries as it is not a language-specific test. Language-specific audiological tests were performed as secondary efficacy evaluations; to enable comparison of data across sites, validated word lists were used at all sites and equivalent speaker configurations (speech from front, noise from behind) and test procedures (same noise and adaptive speech levels, etc) were used.

For the primary evaluation in the investigation, the Baha Attract System was compared to the pre-operative unaided situation, as the intended use of the system is to improve hearing performance in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss or single-sided sensorineural deafness. Audiological test results with the Baha Attract System were also compared against results obtained with the same Sound Processor on a Baha Softband. Use of the Sound Processor on a Softband is a standard procedure that is routinely used as a pre-operative test prior to bone conduction hearing implant surgery. The Softband test allows the patient to pre-operatively experience hearing through the Sound Processor to get an indication of the post-operative hearing outcome and to choose a suitable Sound Processor.

The generic and hearing-specific quality of life questionnaires used in the investigation (HUI3, APHAB, SSQ) are validated scales that have been frequently used and reported in the literature.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Deafness Hearing Loss Hearing Loss, Conductive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Baha Attract System

This transcutaneous solution is based on a magnet coupling using magnets on both side of the skin;

* One implant magnet
* One external magnet on which a sound processor is attached, i.e. the Sound Processor magnet (SP magnet)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Baha Attract System

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Cochlear Baha Attract System incorporates both implantable and external parts. The implantable parts include the BI300 Implant and the BIM400 Implant Magnet, which is intended to be fixated to the BI300 Implant. The external parts include the Sound Processor Magnet (SP Magnet), which, together with the Implant Magnet, constitute the transcutaneous coupling. The SP Magnet incorporates a soft material (Soft pad) at the tissue facing surface that is designed to distribute the pressure over the skin. The Baha Sound Processor attaches to the SP Magnet via a snap coupling.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Baha Attract System

The Cochlear Baha Attract System incorporates both implantable and external parts. The implantable parts include the BI300 Implant and the BIM400 Implant Magnet, which is intended to be fixated to the BI300 Implant. The external parts include the Sound Processor Magnet (SP Magnet), which, together with the Implant Magnet, constitute the transcutaneous coupling. The SP Magnet incorporates a soft material (Soft pad) at the tissue facing surface that is designed to distribute the pressure over the skin. The Baha Sound Processor attaches to the SP Magnet via a snap coupling.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Adult subject, i.e. ≥ 18 years of age

Conductive or mixed hearing loss in the ear to be implanted:

Bone conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of \< 30 dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz).

OR

Single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD):

European sites: Bone conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of \< 30dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) in the good ear.

US sites: Air conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of 20 dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz) in the good ear OR Subject is indicated for an AC CROS but-for some reason-cannot or will not use an AC CROS.

No previous bone conduction implant on the side of the skull to be implanted. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects that are scheduled for simultaneous bilateral implant surgery. The investigation is limited to subjects with unilateral use of the Baha Attract System (however, bilateral hearing loss is not an exclusion criterion).

Suitable implant position for the BI300 Implant (4 mm or 3 mm) not found during surgery due to insufficient bone quality and/or bone thickness.

Less than 3 mm soft tissue thickness at the planned implant site. Subjects that have received radiation therapy at the same side of the skull where the Baha Attract System will be positioned.

Condition that could jeopardise osseointegration and/or wound healing as judged by the investigator (e.g. osteoporosis, psoriasis, use of corticosteroids).

Uncontrolled diabetes as judged by the investigator. Condition that may have an impact on the outcome of the investigation as judged by the investigator.

Unable to follow investigational procedures (e.g. to complete quality of life scales).

Participation in another investigation with pharmaceuticals and/or medical device.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Johan Blechert, M.Sc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr. Doug Backhus

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Christina Runge

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Dr. Myrthe Hol

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

World Hearing Center Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing

Kajetany, Nadarzyn, Poland

Site Status

Peter Monksfield

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kevin Green

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Netherlands Poland United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CBAS5477

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Super Power in BAI
NCT03118375 TERMINATED
Home Test of New Sound Processor
NCT04559282 COMPLETED NA