International Validation Study Of The Algoplus Scale In Five Languages

NCT ID: NCT02018614

Last Updated: 2014-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute pain is responsible for unnecessary suffering. Among elderly patients, acute pain is frequent and underestimated, especially when these patients have cognitive disorders. The expression of pain is then modified and the conventional tools for evaluating pain cannot be used. Thus the existence of pain must be detected on the basis of a behavioural assessment.

It is nonetheless necessary to have the assistance of standardised and validated tools. In France, the Doloplus Group has proposed a scale called Doloplus, validated in January 1999, and is now proposing a new scale for acute pain, Algoplus that has been validated in French (4). Doloplus has been recently translated and validated in 5 languages and an identical methodology will be used in this protocol.

Internationally, although several teams are working on the development of scales that can be used for non-communicating elderly subjects, there is as yet no validated tool for acute pain assessment.

Considering 1- the lack of tools at an international level and 2- the frequent request from many practitioners worldwide, the Doloplus group has offered to validate the Algoplus® scale in 5 foreign languages, English, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese. A rigorous methodology with the help of a statistician will be used in this validation process.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

50 patients per language will be explored : t1 = time t Physician M Physician N t2 = time t+4 hours Physician M

The methodology of the validation of our translation procedure consists of studying the reliability of the scale in two major steps:

* Data from a sample of 50 patients will be used to explore the test-retest reliability of the scale administered by the same trained clinician, on two occasions four hours apart, without any treatment in between. The ALGOPLUS® scores obtained from the patients at a time t will be compared with their (t + 4 hours) scores to assess test-retest reliability.
* For a sample of at least 50 patients, two physicians trained for the use of ALGOPLUS, will assess pain independently. A statistical test will be used to compare the results for the inter-rater reliability.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Elderly Communication Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

testretest relaibility

Data from a sample of 50 patients will be used to explore the test-retest reliability of the scale administered by the same trained clinician, on two occasions four hours apart, without any treatment in between. The ALGOPLUS® scores obtained from the patients at a time t will be compared with their (t + 4 hours) scores to assess test-retest reliability

algoplus

Intervention Type OTHER

statistical test

For a sample of at least 50 patients, two physicians trained for the use of ALGOPLUS, will assess pain independently. A statistical test will be used to compare the results for the inter-rater reliability

algoplus

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

algoplus

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \- males or females aged 65 or above 65, with communication disorders
* with or without suspected acute pain

Exclusion Criteria

* \- are too agitated,
* have acute pain needing immediate pain management,
* change of treatment between the two evaluations ( t and t+4 hours ),
* refuse to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr M Fisher Dr. Ulrike Bornschlegel

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr M Schuler

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Pat Schofield

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr D Lussier

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr S Gibson

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Joan ESPAULELLA PANICOT

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Joan Manuel PEREZ CASTEJON

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gambassi, Giovanni, M.D.

INDIV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Patrizio ODETTI

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Fiametta MONACELLI

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Hirondina GUARDA, Dr Sónia SANTOS

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Gisèle PICKERING

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Valérie LEGOUT

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Patrice Rat

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Bernard WARY

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gisèle PICKERING

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Patrick LACARIN

Role: CONTACT

04 73 75 11 95

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Patrick LACARIN

Role: primary

04 73 75 11 95

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHU-0172

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

3h of PNE on BDNF and Pain Levels
NCT05736172 RECRUITING NA