Treatment of Trauma and Violence in the Townships of South Africa
NCT ID: NCT02012738
Last Updated: 2016-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Change of Neural Network Indicators Through Narrative Treatment of PTSD in Torture Victims
NCT00563888
Addressing Heightened Levels of Aggression in Traumatized Offenders With Psychotherapeutic Means
NCT02992561
Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Adult Survivors of Early Chronic Interpersonal Trauma
NCT01443182
Abuse-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children Who Have Been Physically Abused
NCT00494286
Improving PTSD Treatments for Adults With Childhood Trauma
NCT03194113
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We applied standardised clinical questionnaires in a semi-structured interview for the assessment of exposure to traumatic stress (Children Exposed to Community Violence (CEVC)), trauma symptomatology (PSS-I for diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder), aggression (Appetitive Aggression Scale (AAS); Buss \& Perry Aggression Questionnaire), offense types checklist (from the AAS) and related drug abuse, psychosocial functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale, WSAS) and suicidality (M.I.N.I. 6.0.0., shortened version). Additionally, we used a questionnaire about social acknowledgement (Social Acknowledgement Questionnaire) and substance dependence (M.I.N.I. version 6.0.0).
We set up a randomised clinical intervention trial for the treatment of former offenders that covers violence perpetration on the one hand and traumatization on the other. 90 participants were chosen by the highest aggression scale scores and a certain threshold of trauma symptoms. 17 participants received FORNET, while 14 matched participants received CBT and another 7 matched participants treatment as usual (Waiting List camp) in a camp. Matching took place according to the severity of trauma symptomatology, aggressive behavior and suicidality. 36 participants didn't receive intervention and weren't part of the camp (Waiting List no camp) but were included in the follow-ups. In order to compare the treatment effect with the two control groups and follow the long-term effects, post-treatment assessments with the initial survey were performed about 8, 18 and 25 months post-treatment.
After the follow-ups, 17 FORNET participants and 11 CBT participants were included in the analysis. Two CBT clients had been excluded since they had not come to the follow-ups, one CBT client died a relatively sudden death due to a severe disease. The camp waiting list had been reduced to only six persons since one participant of the waiting list has been stabbed to death in a gang fight. Therefore a combined waiting list has been emerged from the two waiting lists ("camp" and "no camp"). 13 men from the "no camp"-waiting list were excluded since they have not been to the follow ups. From the residual 21 clients from this waiting list, 11 have been matched (together with the six participants from the "camp"-waiting list) with the participants from the FORNET and CBT group in terms of post traumatic stress symptom severity, level of appetitive aggression and suicidality. In the end 17 FORNET-, 11CBT- and 17 waiting list-attendees have been included into the analysis, hence a total sample size of 45 participants.
The 2 subjects of the control group, that still fulfilled the criteria for the therapy study and were interested in it, received FORNET by trained ZA staff for ethical reasons and to examine whether it is possible to effectively disseminate FORNET.
In addition to the subjective data, we will corroborate the results with the assessment of epigenetic consequences of appetitive aggression and trauma and investigate its significance and persistence in the long-term course of the study. We propose that specific DNA methylation patterns are important markers of environmentally driven mental health pathologies, such as chronic aggression/violence and traumatic stress in such a sample of perpetrators or young males at risk for perpetration. Further, we will test the stability of DNA methylation and its potential modification over a period of up to 25 months by behavioural intervention (FORNET).
Saliva samples (2ml) were collected through a non-invasive method using Oragene-Discover (OGR- 500) Collection Kit (DNA genotek, Ontario, Canada). We will collect two DNA saliva samples and one RNA saliva sample. Methylation patterns will be assessed at the University of Stellenbosch (Prof. Soraya Seedat), focussing on markers of trauma and violence.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Assignment to FORNET
17 participants were randomly assigned to FORNET
FORNET
8 individual sessions:
* 1 lifeline
* 6 exposure sessions
* 1 outlook
Assignment to CBT
14 participants were randomly assigned to CBT
CBT
7 individual sessions, according to the "Integrated cognitive behavior change program" manual, Bush et al., 1997, National Institute of Corrections, US Dept. of Justice.
Waiting List Control Group (camp)
7 participants were randomly assigned to the Waiting List Control Group (camp)
Waiting List Control Group (camp)
Participants, if still meeting the criteria and interested, will receive FORNET by local counsellors after the 8-months follow up.
Waiting List Control Group (no camp)
36 participants were assigned to the Waiting List Control Group (no camp)
Waiting List Control Group (no camp)
Participants, if still meeting the criteria and interested, will receive FORNET by local counsellors after the 8-months follow up.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FORNET
8 individual sessions:
* 1 lifeline
* 6 exposure sessions
* 1 outlook
CBT
7 individual sessions, according to the "Integrated cognitive behavior change program" manual, Bush et al., 1997, National Institute of Corrections, US Dept. of Justice.
Waiting List Control Group (camp)
Participants, if still meeting the criteria and interested, will receive FORNET by local counsellors after the 8-months follow up.
Waiting List Control Group (no camp)
Participants, if still meeting the criteria and interested, will receive FORNET by local counsellors after the 8-months follow up.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* High levels of appetitive aggression (i.e. Scores on the Appetitive Aggression Scale (AAS) \> 8 points)
* participants are recruited through the community based re-integration program
Exclusion Criteria
10 Years
40 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cape Town
OTHER
University of Stellenbosch
OTHER
University of Konstanz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Dr. Thomas Elbert
Professor for Clinical Psychology and Behavioural Neuroscience
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas Elbert, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Konstanz
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Capetown, , South Africa
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hinsberger M, Holtzhausen L, Sommer J, Kaminer D, Elbert T, Seedat S, Wilker S, Crombach A, Weierstall R. Feasibility and effectiveness of narrative exposure therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy in a context of ongoing violence in South Africa. Psychol Trauma. 2017 May;9(3):282-291. doi: 10.1037/tra0000197. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ERC-2012-AdG 323977 Memo TV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.