Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
904 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-02-28
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
School-wide Primary Aim: Improve participation in the school breakfast program among high school students. Hypothesis: School-wide school breakfast program participation will be higher in the intervention versus comparison group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Healthy Youth Places: A Program to Promote Nutrition and Physical Activity in Adolescents
NCT00059527
Reducing Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in High Risk Youth
NCT01560676
Impact Study of Minnesota SNAP-Ed Health and Nutrition Education Programs
NCT01918020
Families Becoming Healthy Together
NCT04027426
School-Based Obesity Prevention Program
NCT00142012
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Student-level Secondary Aims Secondary Aim 1: High school students in the intervention condition will decrease their rate of weight gain relative to height gain as measured by change in body mass index and percent body fat compared to students in the control condition. Hypothesis: Body mass index and percent body fat will be maintained or reduced in the treatment versus control group.
Secondary Aim 2: High school students in the intervention condition will maintain or decrease their energy intake while improving dietary intakes of low fat dairy, whole grains and fresh fruits compared to the control students.
Hypothesis: Energy intake (measured by 3, 24-hour recalls) will be maintained or reduced and intakes of low fat dairy, whole grains and fresh fruits will increase more in the intervention groups.
Secondary Aim 3: Compared to students in the control condition, high school students in the intervention condition will report receiving more support to eat school breakfast. Support will be social (increased peer and school support) or related to the school environment (satisfaction with serving locations and times, eating locations, foods and increased availability of low fat dairy, fruits and whole grains for breakfast).
Hypothesis: The treatment group will report receiving more social and school environment support for eating school breakfast than the comparison group (measured by a student survey).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention arm
The role of the intervention arm (schools) is to improve access to the school breakfast program
Improve access to the school breakfast program
Access to the school breakfast program is defined as implementation of a grab-n-go cart outside of the school cafeteria, policy change allowing students to eat in the hallway and marketing of the program. in rural high schools.
Comparison arm
the role of the comparison arm (schools) is to maintain usual breakfast program at school
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Improve access to the school breakfast program
Access to the school breakfast program is defined as implementation of a grab-n-go cart outside of the school cafeteria, policy change allowing students to eat in the hallway and marketing of the program. in rural high schools.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marilyn S Nanney, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nanney MS, Leduc R, Hearst M, Shanafelt A, Wang Q, Schroeder M, Grannon KY, Kubik MY, Caspi C, Harnack LJ. A Group Randomized Intervention Trial Increases Participation in the School Breakfast Program in 16 Rural High Schools in Minnesota. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jun;119(6):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1111S06384
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.