In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study of Pigmented Conjunctival Lesions
NCT ID: NCT01993654
Last Updated: 2016-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
17 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-09-30
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intravital Microscopy for Identifying Tumor Vessels in Patients With Stage IA-IV Melanoma That is Being Removed by Surgery
NCT01886235
Multi-Wavelength and Coherence Confocal Reflectance Microscopy of Pigmented and Non-Pigmented Lesions on the Skin In-Vivo
NCT00574392
Mohs and Immunofluorescence for Malignant Melanoma In Situ
NCT02306512
Confocal Reflectance Microscopy of Shave-Biopsy Sites on Skin in Vivo.
NCT00601185
Randomized Pilot Study of Treatment for BCC Using the Multiplex 595/1064 nm Laser
NCT02270645
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conjunctival Malignant Melanoma (MM) is also currently diagnosed based upon clinical grounds, through observation of the growth of the suspected lesions over regular intervals of time. Unfortunately simple slit lamp examination is currently the only clinical diagnostic visual instrument available in medical practice, and the early diagnosis of MM by slit-lamp examination is still rather poor. Further the diagnosis of invasive conjunctival MM is currently established by conjunctival excisional biopsy and defined by the invasion of the underlying substantia propria of the conjunctiva by atypical tumor cells, especially when there is loss of the maturation. Regarding the management of malignant melanoma, unfortunately the extensive horizontal and even vertical growth of this neoplasm does not always lend itself to simple excision leading to exenteration. As a vision-sparing alternative, local excision with cryotherapy has become the treatment of choice. Long-term follow-up has shown that local recurrences are common. More recently, topical chemotherapy with mitomycin C (MMC) has been used to treat cases with extensive PAM with atypia , because the pigmented margin is used as a guide for most conservative treatments, the tumor's edge may be missed.
Recurrent conjunctival MM often presents as an amelanotic mass and may be mistaken for pyogenic granuloma in a patient who has had multiple previous excisions of conjunctival MM, even though the original tumor may have been pigmented. Because of the lack of pigment, these tumors can remain unrecognized and progressively enlarge, especially if the patient has had previous surgery and conjunctival scarring. In addition, the tumor margins of recurrent amelanotic conjunctival MM may be indistinct. These factors can lead to delayed recognition and the unnecessary need for exenteration. Despite these radical procedures, which usually lead to loss of vision or the eye, these patients have been shown to have a poor survival rate, suggesting that metastasis has already occurred at the time of treatment. This confirms that the extent of the disease at diagnosis is the most important factor to determine the outcome. Recurrence of conjunctival MM is reported at 26% at 5 years and, 51% at 10 years.
MM of the conjunctival represents one of the greatest challenges in early or preventive detection. Whereas surgical excision in early stages of tumor development is almost always curative, delayed recognition puts the patient at risk of destructive growth and death once the tumor has progressed to competence for metastasis. Accurate diagnosis of pigmented lesions of the conjunctiva such as nevi, primary, and secondary acquired melanosis and MM present a challenge to both the ophthalmologist and the pathologist. It is not possible clinically to distinguish between PAM with and without atypia. The ability to detect early MM remains of paramount importance in our efforts to curtail deaths related to this malignancy. The implementation and utilization of in vivo imaging technologies in clinical practice would enhance our ability to detect MM while this cancer is in its early stages and curable. Further, accurate assessment of therapeutic tumor response is critical for evaluation of chemotherapy results in patients, and in clinical trials. Tumor response is also a guide for the clinician and patient or study. Early, accurate prediction of non-response would allow an early change to second-line treatment, thus sparing patient's unnecessary toxicity, psychological morbidity and delay of initiation of effective treatment. These are very few variables that investigators, as clinicians, can control regarding the management of conjunctival MM. However, early detection, technique and time of surgery may ultimate after tumor recurrence, need for orbital exenteration, tumor metastasis, and patient death. This non-invasive imaging technique that is now available for clinical studies might help in early detecting and preventing above mentioned problems.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nevus
HRT III with Non-Contact Cornea Rostock Module
Confocal imaging of the conjunctival lesion
Racial Melanosis
HRT III with Non-Contact Cornea Rostock Module
Confocal imaging of the conjunctival lesion
Primary Acquired Melanosis
HRT III with Non-Contact Cornea Rostock Module
Confocal imaging of the conjunctival lesion
Malignant Melanoma
HRT III with Non-Contact Cornea Rostock Module
Confocal imaging of the conjunctival lesion
Normal
HRT III with Non-Contact Cornea Rostock Module
Confocal imaging of the conjunctival lesion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HRT III with Non-Contact Cornea Rostock Module
Confocal imaging of the conjunctival lesion
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The ability to provide informed consent for enrollment in the study
3. Diagnosis of conjunctival nevus (Group 1 only)
4. Diagnosis of racial melanosis (Group 2 only)
5. Diagnosis or suspicion of primary acquired melanosis (PAM), scheduled for biopsy (Group 3 only)
6. Diagnosis of possible MM scheduled for biopsy (Group 4 only)
7. Confirmed diagnosis of MM based upon clinical and histopathological findings, and have already undergone resection(Group 4 only)
8. Confirmed diagnosis of MM recurrence based upon clinical and histopathological findings(Group 4 only)
9. Clear cornea (Group 5 only)
10. No conjunctival lesions or recent conjunctival diseases(Group 5 only)
11. No recent chemotherapy or radiotherapy(Group 5 only)
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of inflammatory eye diseases within last 3 months
3. Current or history of glaucoma disease and on glaucoma medication
4. Contact lens use within last 3 months
5. Physical inability to cooperate for confocal microscopy
6. Prior history of infectious keratitis within 3 months
7. Suspicion for PAM or malignant melanoma (MM)(Groups 1,2,3)
8. History of PAM or MM(Groups 1,2,3)
9. Histopathology not confirmatory for MM (group 4 only)
10. History of other ocular carcinoma or any recent ocular topical chemotherapy or radiotherapy (Group 5 only)
11. History of cancer elsewhere in the body which is currently under systemic chemotherapy (group 5 only)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Wills Eye
OTHER
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pedram Hamrah, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Carol Shields, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wills Eye Hospital
Arman Mashayekhi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wills Eye Hospital
Bita Esmaeli, MA, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Wills Eye Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-04-028
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.