Analgesic Efficacy of Saphenous Nerve Block in Total Knee Replacement
NCT ID: NCT01991288
Last Updated: 2013-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-11-30
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is considered acceptable after total knee replacements (TKR) in terms of analgesia, ease of performance, early mobilization and early hospital discharge . Continuous femoral nerve block has been used to enhance post op pain relief (POPR) for TKR but at the expense of motor blockade . A Sub sartorial approach to saphenous nerve block (SNB) spares the motor block . To date the role of saphenous nerve block for POPR in TKR has not been evaluated.
Methodology:
In order to test this hypothesis, we proposed to carry out a prospective randomized controlled double blinded (surgeon and assessor) trial study. With institutional ethics approval and having obtained written informed consent from each patient, 20 ASA 1 - 3 patients scheduled to undergo TKR under spinal anesthesia +/- sedation were allocated to one of two groups i.e. Group (SNB): patients receiving SNB sub sartorial approach and Group (NSNB): patients not receiving SNB.
Group allocation was determined using computer generated random number tables. Sealed envelopes were opened on the day of the surgery by the attending anesthetist responsible for the care of the recruited patient.
Postoperative period:
Patients were then assessed for pain at rest and on movement on arrival in recovery and then at 6 , 12 and 24 hrs. Visual analogue scale on a 10 cm straight line was used to assess postoperative pain scores as predictive value of post operative analgesia on rest and movement i.e passive flexion of knee to 30 degree . Patients were assessed for any motor block by using maximum tolerable range of active knee flexion (MKF) and maximum range of straight leg raise(MSLR) on arrival in recovery and at 6, 12 and 24 hrs. All patients received regular paracetamol 1g 6 hourly, diclofenac 75 mg 12 hourly, oxycontin 10-20 mg ( depending on age) 12 hourly and oxynorm 10 mg as rescue analgesia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SNB Saphenous Nerve block
Patients received SNB preoperatively at mid thigh level with ultrasound guidance. 10 mls 0.5% bupivacaine was administered for nerve block by the anesthetist. All patients also received peri operative Local Infiltration Analgesia by the surgeon. All patients will receive preoperative oxycontin, peri operative paracetamol and diclofenac. Post operatively all patients received regular paracetamol 1g 6 hourly, Diclofenac sodium 12 hourly and oxycontin 10-20 mg 12 hourly. All patients received standardized spinal block by the same anesthetist, post nerve block for surgery.
SNB Saphenous Nerve Block
Patients in group SNB received an ultrasound guided SNB (a sub sartorial approach) by a single operator with 10 mls 0.5% bupivacaine. At the end of surgery periarticular knee infiltration of 30 mls 0.5% levobupivacaine + 70 mls 0.9% saline + 0.5 mg adrenaline was performed in a staged fashion by the surgeon, beginning with infiltration of the deep structures on tibial surface at 1mm depth around all exposed tissues, medial and lateral collateral ligament origin, all cut surfaces of extensor mechanism, all cut surface of skin and subcutaneous tissue
NSNB Non Saphenous Nerve Block
Patients only received Local Infiltration Analgesia. As per protocol all patients received the same pre, peri and post operative analgesia as described in the experimental group. All patients had a standardized spinal block for surgery.
NSNB Non Saphenous Nerve Block
All patients at the end of surgery received periarticular knee infiltration of 30 mls 0.5% levobupivacaine + 70 mls 0.9% saline + 0.5 mg adrenaline, in a staged fashion by the surgeon, beginning with infiltration of the deep structures on tibial surface at 1mm depth around all exposed tissues, medial and lateral collateral ligament origin, all cut surfaces of extensor mechanism, all cut surface of skin and subcutaneous tissue
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SNB Saphenous Nerve Block
Patients in group SNB received an ultrasound guided SNB (a sub sartorial approach) by a single operator with 10 mls 0.5% bupivacaine. At the end of surgery periarticular knee infiltration of 30 mls 0.5% levobupivacaine + 70 mls 0.9% saline + 0.5 mg adrenaline was performed in a staged fashion by the surgeon, beginning with infiltration of the deep structures on tibial surface at 1mm depth around all exposed tissues, medial and lateral collateral ligament origin, all cut surfaces of extensor mechanism, all cut surface of skin and subcutaneous tissue
NSNB Non Saphenous Nerve Block
All patients at the end of surgery received periarticular knee infiltration of 30 mls 0.5% levobupivacaine + 70 mls 0.9% saline + 0.5 mg adrenaline, in a staged fashion by the surgeon, beginning with infiltration of the deep structures on tibial surface at 1mm depth around all exposed tissues, medial and lateral collateral ligament origin, all cut surfaces of extensor mechanism, all cut surface of skin and subcutaneous tissue
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cork University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
DR. Jassim Rauf
Specialist Registrar
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
George Shorten, FFARCSI, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dept. of Anaesthesia & ICU, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dept. of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Unit, Cork University Hospital
Cork, Cork, Ireland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JR-0786-GI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id