Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
34 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-03-31
2013-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Evaluation of Combined Laparoscopy With CO2 Intraoperative Colonoscopy Treatment for Colorectal Lesions
NCT00725465
Trial for Single Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy
NCT01101672
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Operations for Colon Cancer
NCT00202111
Laparoscopic Surgery Equivalent to Open Surgery in Right Colon Cancer Surgery?
NCT01772407
St. Paul's Advanced Resection Center Cohort for Colorectal Neoplasia (SPARC-C)
NCT05402696
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Therapy
Patients are treated as per current standard of care
Laparoscopic Assisted Polypectomy
Laparoscopic Assisted Polypectomy
Patients treated with Laparoscopic Assisted Colonoscopic Polypectomy
Laparoscopic Assisted Polypectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laparoscopic Assisted Polypectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Polyp \> 20mm
* Polyp spanning greater than 50% of the colonic circumference
* Positive "lift sign" following submucosal injection of saline beneath the polyp
* Difficult location or position of the polyp, thus preventing assurance of complete endoscopic resection.
Exclusion Criteria
* Polyps in the rectum (\<15cm from anal verge)
* Patients with known inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
* Patients with known familiar adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome
* Polyps without known histology (i.e. not previously biopsied)
* Polyps with large ulcerations, or those that demonstrate a "non-lift sign" during submucosal injection at the time of colonoscopy; as these are indicators of adenocarcinoma .
* Severe cardio-pulmonary disease, or irreversible coagulopathy, preventing abdominal surgery at an acceptable risk.
* POSSUM predicted mortality score greater than 2%
* Inability to obtain informed consent
* Patients under the age of 18
* Pregnant patients
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Stony Brook University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roberto C Bergamaschi, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stonybrook University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stony Brook Medicine
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
144467
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.