How Does the Clinical Tool 'What's Going Around' Affect Clinical Practice

NCT ID: NCT01979588

Last Updated: 2016-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

206703 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Previous work has shown that the epidemiological context of a patient's presentation can provide important information for clinicians to aid in diagnosis and treatment. With current electronic health records, it is increasingly possible to perform syndromic surveillance that is local and specific to a patient's characteristics.

The investigators have developed algorithms for syndromic surveillance for a number of conditions in which contextual information might be of use to treating clinicians. The syndromic surveillance algorithms already developed are for influenza-like-illness, whooping cough, asthma exacerbation, Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis, and gastroenteritis infection.

The investigators plan on studying these tools with a clustered randomized control cohort study evaluating how clinical decision making is affected by use of these tools by outpatient general practitioners. The goal is to incorporate these validated algorithms into a quality improvement tool which will provide point-of-care clinical decision support to clinicians

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The epidemiological context of a patient's presentation can provide important information for clinicians to aid in diagnosis and treatment. The investigators previously developed and validated a syndromic surveillance tool for detecting influenza-like illness (ILI) encounters. The investigators then evaluated 40,642 outpatient ILI episodes during 'flu seasons' over 6 years. The investigators found that even after controlling for patient presentation and physician factors, the context in which a patient presented was strongly associated with the likelihood that an antimicrobial agent would be prescribed. Specifically, patients were less likely to be prescribed an antibiotic if they presented with ILI during the pandemic influenza period (when awareness of 'flu season' was very high), or after their physician had personally seen many patients with ILI in the prior week.

Currently, most clinicians have only limited access to data regarding the 'context' in which a patient presents. Under such circumstances, physicians are often unaware of local epidemiological information that could help them make optimal treatment decisions. In centers with advanced use of electronic health records (EHRs), it is increasingly possible to perform syndromic surveillance that is local (e.g. specific to a neighborhood or school district), current (e.g. updated daily), and specific to a patient's characteristics (e.g. age, chief complaint).

To that end, the investigators have developed algorithms for syndromic surveillance for a number of syndromes including Asthma, ILI, Pertussis, Group A Streptococcus Pharyngitis, and Gastroenteritis. These algorithms may provide contextual information that might be of use to clinicians.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of how a point-of-care clinical decision tool in the form of syndromic surveillance algorithms affect clinical decision making amongst outpatient health care providers and also patient outcomes. We will be using a 2 year look back prior to tool roll out as a comparison.

Specific Aims:

To determine the effect this point-of-care clinical decision tool has on clinical decision making amongst primary care providers.

To determine the clinical outcomes of patients whose physicians had access to these tools

To understand how these point-of-care clinical decision tools are used among healthcare providers in day to day practice

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza Like Illness Asthma Group A Streptococcal Infection Pertussis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Providers do not have access to What's Going Around Tool but receive an instructional video explaining tool

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Control

Intervention Type OTHER

Provider does not have access to the What's Going Around tool but received information regarding the tool prior to study initiation

What's Going Around Tool

Provider has access to What's Going Around Tool. Provider also shown a video explaining how to use Tool

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

What's Going Around tool

Intervention Type OTHER

Provider has access to the What's Going Around tool

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

What's Going Around tool

Provider has access to the What's Going Around tool

Intervention Type OTHER

Control

Provider does not have access to the What's Going Around tool but received information regarding the tool prior to study initiation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All patients seen in a Northshore University HealthSystem outpatient clinic (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine or Pediatric) between the Nov 1 2013 to Oct 31 2014

Exclusion Criteria

None
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Endeavor Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ari Robiscek

Vice President for Clinical and Quality Informatics, Associate CMIO

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ari Robicsek, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Endeavor Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northshore University HealthSystem

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hebert C, Beaumont J, Schwartz G, Robicsek A. The influence of context on antimicrobial prescribing for febrile respiratory illness: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):160-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22868833 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

What's Going Around

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.