Impact on the Use of Antibiotics of a Multimodal Algorithm for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Community-acquired Pneumonia in the Emergency Room
NCT ID: NCT05657275
Last Updated: 2024-10-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
295 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-09
2024-06-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Several studies have shown conflicting results on the impact of multiplex PCR as a point of care tool. Our experience has highlighted an impact on single room assignments during the winter season but not yet on antibiotics prescriptions. This project aims to evaluate a new multimodal algorithm including multiplex PCR at the point of care to reduce antibiotics prescription and therefore has the ability to have a positive impact on antibiotics resistance phenomenon.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Role of Multiplex PCR in CAP
NCT06097117
Combined Use of a Respiratory Broad Panel mPCR and Procalcitonin to Reduce Duration of Antibiotics Exposure in Patients With Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia
NCT03452826
Improving the Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Emergency Rooms
NCT02851771
Impact of a Regional Antimicrobial Stewardship on the Length of Stay of Patients Admitted to Hospital With Pneumonia
NCT02276092
DiagNostic Study of Low-dose CT and multipleX PCR on Antibiotic Treatment and Outcome of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
NCT03360851
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several avenues of study have been investigated to improve the diagnosis of bacterial CAP and thus reduce unnecessary antibiotic therapy: differentiating viral CAP from bacterial CAP using multiplex PCR and/or inflammation biomarkers, localizing the infection lung parenchyma using chest CT.
The various studies carried out on the impact of the use of multiplex PCR in the emergency department (ED) led to discordant conclusions. The study carried out within Bichat Claude-Bernard Hospital only shows an interest for single room assignment in patients infected with pathogens such as influenza, RSV and Metapneumovirus. Multiplex PCR delocalized to the ED does not seem to be a sufficient measure to reduce the prescription of antibiotics in patients suspected of CAP admitted from the emergency room. One study carried during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted that multiplex PCR, used as a point of care, induced improvements in patient flow and infection control measures.
C Reactive Protein (CRP) is a well-known inflammation biomarker. Previous studies estimate that CRP has better performance than procalcitonin in the diagnosis of pneumonia with thresholds often described at 50 mg.L-1 and revised upwards in older patients. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has endorsed the use of point-of-care CRP to diagnose CAP and reduce inappropriate antibiotic use. This recent meta-analysis suggests that CRP is a better marker than PCT for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Indeed, a CRP \>20 mg/L, \>50 mg/L or \>100 mg/L has a positive LR+ likelihood ratio of 2.08, 3.68, and 5.79, respectively, and a negative LR- likelihood ratio of 0.32, 0.36, and 0.48, while PCT \>0.25 µg/L or \>0.50 µg/L has an LR+ of 5.43 and 8.25, respectively, and an LR- of 0.62 and 0.76.
In addition, the place of imaging in reducing the prescription of antibiotics in CAP is still very little studied; nevertheless, CT without injection has proven to be of great help in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and remains the gold standard (reference examination) for effectively diagnosing CAP.
The current recommendations of the French society of infectious diseases do not clearly mention the use of multiplex PCR. CRP is included as a biomarker of inflammation in favor of bacterial infection when it is high. The CT scan is mentioned in cases where the diagnosis of CAP is difficult without defining the criteria for this difficult diagnosis. The College of Pneumology Teachers updated in 2020 places multiplex PCR as an essential diagnostic tool in the management of CAP. Finally, the latest American recommendations (2018) mention the performance of a multiplex PCR as indicated in any patient admitted to hospital with symptoms of influenza-like illness. As a result, the practices of hospitals are very heterogeneous in the diagnosis of CAP, we therefore propose to develop a multimodal algorithm combining multiplex PCR, CRP and chest CT scan in the diagnosis of CAP in patients requiring hospitalization, starting as soon as possible during winter.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention period
Patient management will be guided by a multimodal algorithm integrating the performance of biological and iconographic examinations
CRP dosage
multimodal algorithm
multiplex PCR
multimodal algorithm
chest scan without injection
multimodal algorithm
Control period
Patient management will be done according to the usual practices of centers and emergency physicians
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CRP dosage
multimodal algorithm
multiplex PCR
multimodal algorithm
chest scan without injection
multimodal algorithm
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of at least one respiratory sign among the following: dyspnea, cough, expectoration, auscultatory abnormalities, chest pain;
* Presence of at least one general sign among the following: fever (T\>38°C), hypothermia (T\<35°C), myalgia, headache, asthenia;
* Oxygen-requiring patient defined by a saturation \<95% or presenting a risk area among:
* Age \> 65 years old
* Alcoholic and/or tobacco intoxication
* Congestive heart failure
* Cerebrovascular disease (stroke or transient ischemic attack)
* Chronic kidney disease (excluding dialysis)
* Chronic liver disease
* Unbalanced diabetes mellitus
* Progressive neoplastic disease
* Immunodepression (systemic corticosteroid therapy or immunosuppressive treatment within 6 months, splenectomy, chemotherapy within 6 months, HIV at the AIDS stage, cachexia, etc.)
* Homozygous sickle cell disease
* Bacterial pneumonia
* Hospitalization during the year
* Institutional life
* Patient unable to consent: coma or acute respiratory distress requiring orotracheal intubation
* Patient with chronic renal failure on dialysis
* Patient with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* Lung transplant patient
* Patient being treated with antibiotics at the time of the emergency room consultation
* Patient simultaneously participating in an interventional study protocol (assessing the duration of antibiotic therapy)
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* Patient refusal to participate
* Patient deprived of freedom or under a legal protective measure
* Patient under guardianship or curatorship or with cognitive impairment
* Non-affiliation to a social security regimen or CMU
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc
INDUSTRY
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Donia BOUZID
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, , France
Bichat hospital
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP221018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.