Home Testing of Respiratory Illness

NCT ID: NCT04245800

Last Updated: 2020-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

5233 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-13

Study Completion Date

2020-07-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main goal of this research study is to use data from activity trackers (such as Fitbits), lab tests, and surveys to see if activity, sleep, and heart rate data can tell the difference between when someone has a respiratory illness (e.g., flu) and when they are feeling healthy. The research will also study an investigational flu@home test and app. If successful, results from the study could be used in the future to better identify people with respiratory illness. In addition, this study will test the accuracy of an at-home flu test kit compared to laboratory test results.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and Rationale

Acute respiratory infections (ARI) cause considerable disease burden globally and can affect both the upper and lower respiratory tract. A majority of ARI are caused by viruses, like the influenza virus, while bacteria are only implicated in approximately 10% of cases . The symptomology across various viral ARI are broadly similar, but two viruses, namely influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality among adults and children. More immediate virus identification would improve patient health management by triaging appropriate and timely treatment and infection-control measures to mitigate health costs, additional health complications, and total days of symptom expression.

Despite viral infections causing the majority of ARIs, 61% of those with acute respiratory symptoms receive an antibiotic treatment. Due to the rise of antibiotic resistance, the inappropriate and over-prescription of antibiotics has become a severe health risk and is contributing to greater health complications and increased mortality rates. As a result, the correct diagnosis of the various infections associated with ARIs has become even more imperative to not cause undue harm. The abundance, accessibility, and rapidly advancing technology in wearable devices contributes to the progress some studies have demonstrated in using the devices as a potential mechanism to more rapidly identify various diseases. Though limited research has explored this new perspective specifically in illnesses associated with ARI, recent findings were able to demonstrate influenza signals at a population level using step, sleep, and heart rate data collected from consumer wearable devices.

Influenza virus is important to diagnose correctly because, despite annual vaccinations, it has been associated with higher morbidity and mortality than most other ARI viruses and has been associated with greater individual symptom severity. During the 2017-2018 flu season in the United States, it was estimated that 48.8 million people became sick with influenza, 959,000 were hospitalized, and there were 79,400 deaths recorded due to influenza. Additionally, more vulnerable populations, like young children, those experiencing chronic illness, and older adults, disproportionately represent the hospitalization and death totals reported. Older adults represented 70% of influenza related hospitalizations in the 2017-2018 flu season and 90% of influenza related deaths.

The rapid diagnosis of influenza is also of particular importance due to the effectiveness of influenza antiviral medication that is largely limited to initiation within 48 hours of symptom onset. Additionally, rapid diagnosis also has the potential to enact infection control measures to attenuate viral spread, particularly among vulnerable populations, using behavioral interventions or other non-pharmaceutical approaches. Diagnosis of influenza infection in centralized laboratories has largely progressed from traditional viral culture to the use of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods . Alternatively, influenza infection can be detected within a medical office or pharmacy using commercially-available rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) of varying complexity, cost and accuracy.

There is now interest to expand RDTs to self-conducted tests that individuals can complete at home to further reduce the period between the onset of illness and effective treatment. Audere, a digital health non-profit, developed a mobile device app, the flu@home app, to guide individuals to perform an influenza RDT themselves without being in a clinical setting. The flu@home test uses a mixture of images and written directions prompted through the flu@home app to walk individuals through an influenza RDT process. The flu@home test also includes modified influenza RDT test material from an FDA 510(k) cleared RDT and includes an optional in-app automated influenza RDT test result interpretation system to eventually help inform health decisions and behaviors. Though no research has been published on the efficacy of the flu@home system, it has been implemented, and is being investigated, in two large prospective observational clinical studies during the 2019-2020 flu season, with collaborators at the University of Washington, Seattle and University of Adelaide, Australia.

Expanding on the previous research and development that has been done, the aim of this study is to develop a methodology to better classify and detect RVI cases, including influenza, through the use of behavioral data and patient-reported outcomes, using RVI confirmation through laboratory testing as a reference. This study also aims to assess the accuracy of the flu@home RDT self-test, the in-app automated RDT test result interpretation, and a data enhanced RDT test interpretation, compared to the interpretation provided by a trained professional RDT reader, the PCR test result, and a reference influenza test interpretations/analysis.

Device Description

The flu@home test kit is an at-home self-administered modified influenza RDT that is completed with the assistance of a mobile device app. The flu@home app feature was developed by Audere, a digital health non-profit based in Seattle. The flu@home test consists of the instructional app experience that guides participants through the influenza RDT procedure and the physical material of the RDT influenza test kit modified from the Quidel QuickVue Influenza A+B test. The flu@home app will solely be utilized as an instructional guide and research data collection tool for this study.

The flu@home test kit's instructional app features are available on iOS and Android platforms. The instructional app features include multiple pages of text and imagery content guiding participants through the entirety of the influenza RDT process, from completing a nasal swab to adding solution into a test tube to run a lateral flow immunoassay. The instructional app also includes an in-app questionnaire for participants to complete during a 10-minute participant wait period while their immunoassay processes. The flu@home test kit also guides participants through the viral collection and appropriate transport procedure of study samples for additional RVI analysis to be completed at an accredited laboratory.

The physical material of the flu@home test kit consists of components from an existing commercial influenza RDT, with additional material to collect and return a reference sample for laboratory testing. The complete flu@home test kit includes two foam-tipped nasal swabs, a small tube with dried reagent, a saline vial, a lateral-flow immunoassay test strip, and a tube with liquid reagent for the PCR test. RDT testing material is utilized from the CLIA-waived Quidel QuickVue Influenza A+B Test. All physical testing material will be assembled and mailed to participants through a 3rd party vendor, Molecular Testing Lab (MTL). The flu@home test kit also includes mailing material for participants to return the RDT test remnant and strip to be discarded by MTL and the reference nasal swab for laboratory testing through PCR procedures at MTL's accredited facility.

The flu@home test kit's interpretation features will not be shared with participants within the parameters of this study.

Regulatory Status

The flu@home test kit is considered a non-significant investigational device that is being used for data collection purposes and will be labeled as an investigational device. The test kit contains foam-tipped nasal swabs, a small tube with dried reagent, a saline vial and test strip from the CLIA-waived Quidel QuickVue Influenza A+B Test, and a tube with liquid reagent for the PCR test.

Explanation of choice comparator

PCR (RT-PCR for RNA viruses including influenza) is a reliable reference test for influenza and other respiratory viruses. RT-PCR was identified as the comparator for the modified at-home self-administered influenza RDT. Though RDTs can produce results in a much shorter period of time than RT-PCRs, RT-PCRs have been found to have more sensitivity to the influenza viruses than do RDTs. PCR or RT-PCR is often used as the reference test in research studies and studies designed for FDA submission (e.g., influenza RT-PCR was used as a reference test in the FDA 510(k) submission for the Quidel QuickVue Influenza A+B Test; Quidel, 2018).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza -Like Illness Influenza A Influenza Type B Respiratory Viral Infection Respiratory Tract Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Observational

All participants will be part of the prospective observational cohort. If participants develop flu-like symptoms, they will be prompted to complete the flu@home self-test kit. Analysis will be conducted for various subgroups (e.g. age, vaccination status)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older
* Lives in the United States
* Speaks, reads, and understands English
* Owns a wearable Fitbit that collects heart rate data
* Willing to connect their Fitbit to the Achievement study platform and wear their Fitbit daily during the day and during sleep for the duration of the study
* Willing to respond to short daily questionnaires for a 4-month period
* Has an iOS or Android smartphone or tablet that is capable of supporting the Audere flu@home app
* Google Play Store compatible Android devices on Android 5.1 or later
* iOS devices on iOS 11 or later
* Willing to download the flu@home app
* Willing to complete an at-home flu test kit (via two nasal swabs) and return the nasal swab samples within 24 hours of being asked to complete a flu test kit

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed with flu by a healthcare professional in the past 3 months
* Currently enrolled in another flu study being conducted by Evidation Health/Achievement Studies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Audere

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Evidation Health

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jessie Juusola

Sr Director, Health Outcomes Research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew J Thompson, DPhil

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Washington

Jessie L Juusola, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Evidation Health

Ernesto Ramirez, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Evidation Health

Barry Lutz, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Washinton

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Evidation Health

San Mateo, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abu-Diab A, Azzeh M, Ghneim R, Ghneim R, Zoughbi M, Turkuman S, Rishmawi N, Issa AE, Siriani I, Dauodi R, Kattan R, Hindiyeh MY. Comparison between pernasal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates for detection of common respiratory viruses in samples from children. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jul;46(7):2414-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00369-08. Epub 2008 May 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18480225 (View on PubMed)

Bradshaw B, Konty KJ, Ramirez E, et al. 2019. Influenza surveillance using wearable mobile health devices, Online J Public Health Inform, 11:e249

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Burnham JP, Olsen MA, Kollef MH. Re-estimating annual deaths due to multidrug-resistant organism infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;40(1):112-113. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.304. Epub 2018 Nov 22. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30463634 (View on PubMed)

Donnelly JP, Baddley JW, Wang HE. Antibiotic utilization for acute respiratory tract infections in U.S. emergency departments. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(3):1451-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02039-13. Epub 2013 Dec 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24342652 (View on PubMed)

Durkin MJ, Jafarzadeh SR, Hsueh K, Sallah YH, Munshi KD, Henderson RR, Fraser VJ. Outpatient Antibiotic Prescription Trends in the United States: A National Cohort Study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 May;39(5):584-589. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.26. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29485018 (View on PubMed)

Dziabowska K, Czaczyk E, Nidzworski D. Detection Methods of Human and Animal Influenza Virus-Current Trends. Biosensors (Basel). 2018 Oct 18;8(4):94. doi: 10.3390/bios8040094.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30340339 (View on PubMed)

Ebell MH, Afonso A. A systematic review of clinical decision rules for the diagnosis of influenza. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):69-77. doi: 10.1370/afm.1192.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21242564 (View on PubMed)

Ebell MH, Afonso AM, Gonzales R, Stein J, Genton B, Senn N. Development and validation of a clinical decision rule for the diagnosis of influenza. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;25(1):55-62. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110161.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22218625 (View on PubMed)

Fendrick AM, Monto AS, Nightengale B, Sarnes M. The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 24;163(4):487-94. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.4.487.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12588210 (View on PubMed)

Kwon YS, Park SH, Kim MA, Kim HJ, Park JS, Lee MY, Lee CW, Dauti S, Choi WI. Risk of mortality associated with respiratory syncytial virus and influenza infection in adults. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2897-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29262784 (View on PubMed)

Larios OE, Coleman BL, Drews SJ, Mazzulli T, Borgundvaag B, Green K; STOP-Flu Study Group; McGeer AJ. Self-collected mid-turbinate swabs for the detection of respiratory viruses in adults with acute respiratory illnesses. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021335. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21731708 (View on PubMed)

Pope LE, Hobbs CG. Epistaxis: an update on current management. Postgrad Med J. 2005 May;81(955):309-14. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.025007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15879044 (View on PubMed)

Ross MH, Zick BL, Tsalik EL. Host-Based Diagnostics for Acute Respiratory Infections. Clin Ther. 2019 Oct;41(10):1923-1938. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31353133 (View on PubMed)

Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US Emergency Department Visits for Outpatient Adverse Drug Events, 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2115-2125. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16201.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27893129 (View on PubMed)

Smith SM, Sonego S, Wallen GR, Waterer G, Cheng AC, Thompson P. Use of non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce the transmission of influenza in adults: A systematic review. Respirology. 2015 Aug;20(6):896-903. doi: 10.1111/resp.12541. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25873071 (View on PubMed)

Uyeki TM, Bernstein HH, Bradley JS, Englund JA, File TM, Fry AM, Gravenstein S, Hayden FG, Harper SA, Hirshon JM, Ison MG, Johnston BL, Knight SL, McGeer A, Riley LE, Wolfe CR, Alexander PE, Pavia AT. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 Update on Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management of Seasonal Influenzaa. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 5;68(6):895-902. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy874. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30834445 (View on PubMed)

VanWormer JJ, Sundaram ME, Meece JK, Belongia EA. A cross-sectional analysis of symptom severity in adults with influenza and other acute respiratory illness in the outpatient setting. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 May 1;14:231. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-231.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24884932 (View on PubMed)

Vos LM, Bruning AHL, Reitsma JB, Schuurman R, Riezebos-Brilman A, Hoepelman AIM, Oosterheert JJ. Rapid Molecular Tests for Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Impact Studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(7):1243-1253. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz056.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30689772 (View on PubMed)

Walker TA, Khurana S, Tilden SJ. Viral respiratory infections. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1994 Dec;41(6):1365-81. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38876-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7984389 (View on PubMed)

Hunter V, Shapiro A, Chawla D, Drawnel F, Ramirez E, Phillips E, Tadesse-Bell S, Foschini L, Ukachukwu V. Characterization of Influenza-Like Illness Burden Using Commercial Wearable Sensor Data and Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mixed Methods Cohort Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 23;25:e41050. doi: 10.2196/41050.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36951890 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.quidel.com/sites/default/files/product/documents/EF1350313EN00_1.pdf

CLIA Waiver for Quidel QuickVue Influenza A + B Test. (Part of flu@home kit)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00008861

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.