Sub-Sensory Intraspinal Neurostimulation Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01976598

Last Updated: 2015-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To explore the optimal stimulation parameters and locations for sub-perception programming in patients with previously implanted spinal cord stimulation systems for the treatment of chronic back and/or leg pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic pain remains a serious public health problem, resulting in approximately 100 million chronic pain patients in the U.S. alone \[1\]. While numerous treatments exist, none completely addresses this issue. In particular, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become an established technique for treating patients with chronic neuropathic pain \[2\]. The conventional paradigm for SCS treatment is to attempt to mask the pain by substituting the pain sensation with paresthesias \[3\]; however, newer studies have shown that it is possible to gain excellent pain relief without concomitant paresthesias ("sub-threshold stimulation") using different stimulation parameters \[4\] \[5\]. Because these paresthesia-free programming paradigms are still new, the best to place the stimulation and the best programming parameters to use is still unclear, making it difficult to place the leads during surgical implantation and to program the patient afterwards. Additionally, sub-threshold stimulation does not provide immediate pain relief, but may take several hours or even days to feel relief, making a simple programming session of a few hours insufficient to determine the optimal stimulation placement. While these differences from conventional SCS make programming more difficult initially, studying this new stimulation paradigm, especially differences in optimal stimulation location and the time course of pain relief, may also provide insight into the mechanism of action of sub-threshold stimulation. This protocol aims to study the optimal stimulation parameters and locations with SCS using sub-threshold stimulation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Back Pain Back Pain With Radiation Pain in Leg, Unspecified

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sub-Sensory

Patients implanted with a Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulation System for the treatment of chronic back and/or leg pain using Sub-Sensory Stimulation.

Sub-Sensory Stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Sub-Sensory Stimulation using Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulation System in patients currently implanted with the system .

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sub-Sensory Stimulation

Sub-Sensory Stimulation using Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulation System in patients currently implanted with the system .

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sub-Sensory Spinal Cord Stimulatiocn.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary pain complaint of persistent or recurrent low back and/or leg pain, with or without leg pain, for at least 180 days prior to Baseline.
* Received a Boston Scientific SCS System with active contacts located between superior endplate of T7 and the inferior endplate of T10 with a minimum of three active contacts within this anatomical area.
* No back surgery within 180 days prior to Baseline.
* Has had stimulator "on" (activated or operational) for at least 36 hours prior to Baseline evaluation.
* Average low back and/or leg pain intensity, during the position/activity which routinely causes worst pain, of 5 or greater on a 0-10 numerical rating scale without neurostimulation.
* If taking prescription opioids for primary chronic pain complaint (low back and/or leg pain), must have been on a stable prescription (same drug(s) and dose(s)) for 30 days prior to Baseline
* Consumed an average total daily morphine equivalent of ≤300 mg during the 30 days prior to Baseline
* Willing and able to comply with all protocol-required procedures and assessments/evaluations (e.g. willing to comply with opioid prescription lock throughout the study, changes to the stimulation parameters, complete twice-daily diary)
* 22 years of age or older when written informed consent is obtained
* Able to independently read and complete all questionnaires and assessments provided in English
* Subject signed a valid, IRB-approved informed consent form (ICF) provided in English

Exclusion Criteria

* Any pain-related diagnosis or medical/psychological condition that, in the clinician's best judgment, might confound reporting of study outcomes (e.g. pelvic pain, chronic migraine, schizophrenia)
* Current uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* Significant cognitive impairment at Baseline that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would reasonably be expected to impair the study candidate's ability to assess pain intensity and/or complete a pain diary
* Participated in any investigational study within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or is currently participating in another clinical trial that may influence the data that will be collected for this study
* A female who is breastfeeding or of child-bearing potential with a positive urine pregnancy test or not using adequate contraception
* Plan to receive any massage or manipulation directly over the leads or by the location of the IPG or treatments that involve sudden jerking motions of the torso at any time during the course of the study
* Unresolved active litigation related to the pain condition being treated in the study
* Currently involved in a worker's compensation claim
* Unable to operate the SCS System
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Algos Clinical Development Thomas L. Yearwood, MD, PhD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Algos Clinical Development Thomas L. Yearwood, MD, PhD

Medical Director / Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas L Yearwood, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Algos Cinical Development

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Comprehensive Pain and Rehabilitation

Pascagoula, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tiede J, Brown L, Gekht G, Vallejo R, Yearwood T, Morgan D. Novel spinal cord stimulation parameters in patients with predominant back pain. Neuromodulation. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):370-5. doi: 10.1111/ner.12032. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23433237 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.fda.gov

Home Page for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

http://www.wirb.com

WIRB sets the standard in the field of independent ethical review of biomedical research on human subjects.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20131546

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ALG-ANA1001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.