A Pilot Trial of Intravenous (IV) Pamidronate for Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT00101790
Last Updated: 2010-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-09-30
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Pilot Trial of IV Pamidronate for Low Back Pain
NCT01210599
A Study of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy of MDT-15 in Subjects With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT01917825
Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3016859 in Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
NCT04476108
Effect of Nitrous Oxide in Treating Neuropathic Pain: A Study in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
NCT01172600
Treatment of Pain Associated With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy in Adults
NCT03727100
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main objective of this single-center, double-blind study is to determine the optimal dosing regimen-based on safety, tolerability, and pain relief- which should be used in planning a future, large-scale, clinical study to clarify conclusively whether chronic low back pain, unrelated to cancer, can be treated with pamidronate.
Forty-four persons will be recruited for participation. There will be four study groups, each with 7 subjects randomly assigned to pamidronate and 4 to placebo. The dosage for the pamidronate participants will be 30 mg of pamidronate for the first group, 60 mg for the second group, and 90 mg for the third group. Members of the fourth group will receive 2 treatments of 90mg IV pamidronate or placebo.
In this study, scientists also hope to find out if the effectiveness of pamidronate can be predicted with bone scans (a procedure used to see bone inflammation or injuries to the bone), and if improvement in performance of daily tasks is related to the amount of pamidronate a participant receives and to improvement in pain intensity, and to evaluate patient satisfaction with the pamidronate treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
pamidronate
There will be four study groups, each with 7 subjects randomly assigned to pamidronate and 4 to placebo. The groups will occur in succession, not parallel. The dosage for group 1 will be 30 mg , 60 mg for group 2, and 90 mg for group 3. Group 4 will receive 2 treatments of 90mg IV pamidronate or placebo.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
pamidronate
There will be four study groups, each with 7 subjects randomly assigned to pamidronate and 4 to placebo. The groups will occur in succession, not parallel. The dosage for group 1 will be 30 mg , 60 mg for group 2, and 90 mg for group 3. Group 4 will receive 2 treatments of 90mg IV pamidronate or placebo.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having mechanical low back pain (LBP) that is predominantly axial, i.e., subjects with low back pain with proximal radiation (above the knee), or subjects with low back pain with distal radiation of pain (below the knee), only if their low back pain component is 50% or more than their leg pain component. This pain will have been present for at least 3 months, with a minimum, average pain score of 4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale \[NRS; a score of 4 is associated with pain of "moderate" intensity, and its use as a cutoff value is supported by the clinical relevance of similar scores found by others.
* MRI evidence of multiple level disc degeneration and vertebral changes consistent with the diagnosis of degenerative disc disease or spondylotic disease of the spine.
* Being capable of reading at a sixth-grade level.
Exclusion Criteria
* Compression fracture(s)
* Cancer that can be a possible cause of the back pain
* MRI evidence of frank disk herniation or any other abnormality or pathology (other than disc degeneration and vertebral changes consistent with the diagnosis of degenerative disc disease or spondylotic disease of the spine) regarding the probable cause of the patient's spinal pain; for example, arachnoiditis, moderate to severe spinal canal stenosis, lateral recess stenosis, congenital malformation of the spine, spinal nerve tumor, etc.
* Clinical diagnosis of relevant radiculopathic / neuropathic pain with leg pain, i.e., subjects with low back pain with distal radiation of pain (below the knee) if their leg pain component is more than 50% than their back pain component, or subjects with back pain with neurological deficits consistent with lumbosacral radiculopathy (upon examination)
* Presumptive compression of a spinal nerve root or fracture of a pars interarticularis (3) Spondylolisthesis (greater than grade one or more than 4 mm)
* A history of hypocalcemia
* Abnormal lab values:
* A baseline value for liver function that is 5% or more above the upper normal limit
* Upon the first laboratory screen, we will exclude anyone whose creatinine level is more than 5% outside the normal range. Then, of those who have acceptable creatinine levels, we will exclude anyone with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that is less than 60. The GFR will be calculated according to Levey et al.
* The principal investigator will use his judgment regarding excluding any individual with other abnormal lab values.
* A history of significant cardiac, hematological, renal, hepatic, metabolic, endocrinological, or neurological disease
* An allergy to bisphosphonates
* Leukopenia or thrombocytopenia
* Being pregnant or nursing
* Diagnosis of painful polyneuropathy, e.g., painful diabetic neuropathy
* Psychotic symptoms. Dr. Barry Snow, the study consulting psychologist, will train study staff to recognize these symptoms.
* Alcohol abuse or illicit drug use
* Receiving Worker's Compensation, or having a pending Worker's Compensation claim
* Being blind, deaf, or mute, or having a physical or mental handicap that impedes administration of instruments that will provide outcome data
* Weighing less than 45 kg (this is rare for an adult)
* Subjects who are suicidal according to the Beck Depression Inventory, or score 26 and above on the Beck Depression Inventory will be excluded from the study.
* Prior pamidronate treatment
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, United States, 10029
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Pappagallo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Mount Sinai Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.