Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-04-30
2009-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study was a randomized, double blind, dose-escalation trial of IV pamidronate. Study participants were divided among four study phases. Each group received IV placebo or escalating doses of IV pamidronate.
STUDY DESIGN A phase I-II, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, dose finding study for the treatment of patients with CLBP with IV pamidronate. The study was first conducted at Beth Israel Medical Center, NY for the first two groups, and was completed at Mount Sinai Medical Center , NY for the remaining groups.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES The intent of this pilot study was to determine the optimal IV pamidronate treatment protocol for CLBP in a Phase III trial. Primary study aims were safety and average daily pain. Subjects used an electronic diary (LOGPAD) to record their daily adverse events (AEs) and their baseline and post-treatment average pain on the 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS).
STATISTICAL ANALYSES All the analysis were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Primary outcomes are LOGPAD change in pain severity and whether a patient was a responder (pain score dropped ≥2 points or ≥30%). Because there was no statistical difference in these two outcomes among the 4 placebo groups, all placebo patients were combined (Comb PL) in the subsequent analyses. Primary analytic tool was mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM), assuming autoregressive covariance structure (LOGPAD pain and Brief Pain Inventory - BPI interferences), and Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model for categorical outcomes (Response rates and Patient Global Impression of Change - PGIC). The main objective was to assess whether the changes in outcome from baseline or the response rates were the same across the study phases, while adjusting for baseline values and time effect. Least square means were contrasted. Interaction between time and study phases were also tested to see if the treatment effect is a function of time. Fisher's exact tests or ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) tests were performed for cross-sectional group comparison, including baseline.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
EXCLUSION STUDY CRITERIA Prior back surgery, compression fracture(s), cancer as possible cause of back pain Clinically relevant radiculopathic pain, MRI evidence of frank DISK HERNIATION or any other abnormality or pathology regarded as the probable cause of the patient's pain.
Defect or fracture of a pars interarticularis, spondylolisthesis with greater than 4 mm of misalignment Having a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 . Hypocalcemia, significant cardiac, hematological, renal, hepatic, metabolic, endocrinological disease Being pregnant or nursing Receiving Worker's Compensation, having a pending legal claim Weighing less than 45 kg Subjects who score 26 and above on the Beck Depression Inventory Prior pamidronate treatment patients who in the opinion of the study physician have poor oral hygiene, do not have regular dental care, had a tooth extraction or another invasive dental procedure within 3 months prior to study enrollment
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IV infusion of pamidronate vs placebo
Pamidronate
The study was a randomized, double blind, dose-escalation trial of IV pamidronate. Study participants were divided among four study phases. Each group received IV placebo or escalating doses of IV pamidronate of 30mg, 60mg, 90mg and 180mg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pamidronate
The study was a randomized, double blind, dose-escalation trial of IV pamidronate. Study participants were divided among four study phases. Each group received IV placebo or escalating doses of IV pamidronate of 30mg, 60mg, 90mg and 180mg.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pain for at least 3 months, with a minimum average daily pain score of 4 on a 0-10 NRS MRI evidence of disc degeneration and changes consistent with the diagnosis of degenerative disc disease or spondylotic disease of the spine.
EXCLUSION STUDY CRITERIA:
* Prior back surgery, compression fracture(s), cancer as possible cause of back pain Clinically relevant radiculopathic pain,
* MRI evidence of frank DISK HERNIATION or any other abnormality or pathology regarded as the probable cause of the patient's pain.
* Defect or fracture of a pars interarticularis, spondylolisthesis with greater than 4 mm of misalignment Having a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 .
* Hypocalcemia, significant cardiac, hematological, renal, hepatic, metabolic, endocrinological disease
* Being pregnant or nursing
* Receiving Worker's Compensation, having a pending legal claim
* Weighing less than 45 kg
* Subjects who score 26 and above on the Beck Depression Inventory
* Prior pamidronate treatment patients who in the opinion of the study physician have poor oral hygiene, do not have regular dental care, had a tooth extraction or another invasive dental procedure within 3 months prior to study enrollment
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pappagallo, Marco, M.D.
INDIV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Pappagallo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-0782
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id